Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-78
AllowedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Stable
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
4253 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-117568 (GCVE-0-2026-117568)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-27 13:08 – Updated: 2026-10-28 16:16
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
mcp-ffmpeg through 1.0.5 OS Command Injection via videoPath and outputDir
Summary
mcp-ffmpeg through 1.0.5 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to run shell commands by supplying crafted videoPath or outputDir values to the resize-video, extract-audio and get-video-info tools. Attackers can embed $(), backticks or a closing double quote in an existing file or directory name to break out of the child_process.exec command string and execute commands as the MCP server user.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-28 14:58 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
VulnCheck
CNA
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/bitscorp-mcp/mcp-ffmpeg/issues/8 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/bitscorp-mcp/mcp-ffmpeg | product |
| https://github.com/bitscorp-mcp/mcp-ffmpeg/blob/2… | technical-description |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/mcp-ffmpeg-t… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| bitscorp-mcp | mcp-ffmpeg |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.0.5
(semver)
|
Date Public
2026-10-24 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-117568",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-28T14:58:09.353499Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-28T16:16:50.835Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/mcp-ffmpeg",
"product": "mcp-ffmpeg",
"vendor": "bitscorp-mcp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.0.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Nguy\u1ec5n V\u0103n Ti\u1ebfn"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-24T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "mcp-ffmpeg through 1.0.5 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to run shell commands by supplying crafted videoPath or outputDir values to the resize-video, extract-audio and get-video-info tools. Attackers can embed $(), backticks or a closing double quote in an existing file or directory name to break out of the child_process.exec command string and execute commands as the MCP server user."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-27T13:08:01.183Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Issue #8",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/bitscorp-mcp/mcp-ffmpeg/issues/8"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/bitscorp-mcp/mcp-ffmpeg"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/bitscorp-mcp/mcp-ffmpeg/blob/2ec04e44850cc5ee5354c40643be8bc91c218654/src/mcp-ffmpeg.ts#L184"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: mcp-ffmpeg through 1.0.5 OS Command Injection via videoPath and outputDir",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/mcp-ffmpeg-through-1.0.5-os-command-injection-via-videopath-and-outputdir"
}
],
"title": "mcp-ffmpeg through 1.0.5 OS Command Injection via videoPath and outputDir",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-117568",
"datePublished": "2026-10-27T13:08:01.183Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-27T11:25:26.115Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-28T16:16:50.835Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-117567 (GCVE-0-2026-117567)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-27 13:08 – Updated: 2026-11-02 19:16
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
esp-mcp through commit 28afddf OS Command Injection via MCP Tool Parameters
Summary
esp-mcp through commit 28afddf contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to run arbitrary commands by supplying shell metacharacters in MCP tool parameters. Attackers influencing agent tool calls through prompt injection can inject metacharacters into target, port, project_path, or project_name values passed to asyncio.create_subprocess_shell, executing commands as the MCP server user.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-11-02 19:16 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
VulnCheck
CNA
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/horw/esp-mcp/issues/49 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/horw/esp-mcp | product |
| https://github.com/horw/esp-mcp/blob/28afddf9ff41… | technical-description |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/esp-mcp-thro… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-10-24 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-117567",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-02T19:16:00.891713Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-02T19:16:58.907Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/horw/esp-mcp/issues/49"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "esp-mcp",
"vendor": "horw",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "28afddf9ff41ada117bb45fd49b526d3bf89749e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Nguy\u1ec5n V\u0103n Ti\u1ebfn"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-24T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "esp-mcp through commit 28afddf contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to run arbitrary commands by supplying shell metacharacters in MCP tool parameters. Attackers influencing agent tool calls through prompt injection can inject metacharacters into target, port, project_path, or project_name values passed to asyncio.create_subprocess_shell, executing commands as the MCP server user."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-27T13:08:00.469Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Issue #49",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/horw/esp-mcp/issues/49"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/horw/esp-mcp"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/horw/esp-mcp/blob/28afddf9ff41ada117bb45fd49b526d3bf89749e/main.py#L80"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: esp-mcp through commit 28afddf OS Command Injection via MCP Tool Parameters",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/esp-mcp-through-commit-28afddf-os-command-injection-via-mcp-tool-parameters"
}
],
"title": "esp-mcp through commit 28afddf OS Command Injection via MCP Tool Parameters",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-117567",
"datePublished": "2026-10-27T13:08:00.469Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-27T11:25:25.707Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-02T19:16:58.907Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-117561 (GCVE-0-2026-117561)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-27 13:07 – Updated: 2026-11-05 17:27
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
sf-mcp through 1.3.2 OS Command Injection via Salesforce CLI Flag Values
Summary
Codefriar sf-mcp through 1.3.2 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to execute shell commands by supplying crafted Salesforce CLI tool flag values. Because escapeValue() in src/utils.ts fails to neutralize backticks, $() substitution, and other shell metacharacters, these values reach execSync in executeSfCommand and run as the MCP server user.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-11-05 17:27 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
VulnCheck
CNA
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/codefriar/sf-mcp/issues/17 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/codefriar/sf-mcp | product |
| https://github.com/codefriar/sf-mcp/blob/beb103dc… | technical-description |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/sf-mcp-throu… | third-party-advisory |
Date Public
2026-10-23 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-117561",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-05T17:27:02.794688Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T17:27:12.344Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/codefriar/sf-mcp/issues/17"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/sf-mcp",
"product": "sf-mcp",
"vendor": "codefriar",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.3.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Nguy\u1ec5n V\u0103n Ti\u1ebfn"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-23T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Codefriar sf-mcp through 1.3.2 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to execute shell commands by supplying crafted Salesforce CLI tool flag values. Because escapeValue() in src/utils.ts fails to neutralize backticks, $() substitution, and other shell metacharacters, these values reach execSync in executeSfCommand and run as the MCP server user."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-27T13:07:56.281Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Issue #17",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/codefriar/sf-mcp/issues/17"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/codefriar/sf-mcp"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/codefriar/sf-mcp/blob/beb103dced68962e0c069b62cb377286751d0103/src/utils.ts#L79-L90"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: sf-mcp through 1.3.2 OS Command Injection via Salesforce CLI Flag Values",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/sf-mcp-through-1.3.2-os-command-injection-via-salesforce-cli-flag-values"
}
],
"title": "sf-mcp through 1.3.2 OS Command Injection via Salesforce CLI Flag Values",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-117561",
"datePublished": "2026-10-27T13:07:56.281Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-27T11:25:22.921Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T17:27:12.344Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-117560 (GCVE-0-2026-117560)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-27 13:07 – Updated: 2026-10-28 16:17
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
ATXP Gemini CLI Extension through 1.0.0 OS Command Injection via MCP Tools
Summary
ATXP Gemini CLI extension through 1.0.0 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in runAtxp() that allows attackers to execute shell commands through unsanitized MCP tool parameters. Attackers can plant instructions in email or SMS content to inject $() or backtick substitutions into parameters like message_id, subject, or query, running commands as the user.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-28 14:58 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
VulnCheck
CNA
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/atxp-dev/atxp/issues/15 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/atxp-dev/atxp | product |
| https://github.com/atxp-dev/atxp/blob/4e88b0282b5… | technical-description |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/atxp-gemini-… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| atxp | gemini-cli-extension |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.0.0
(semver)
|
Date Public
2026-10-23 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-117560",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-28T14:58:01.954396Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-28T16:17:06.328Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "gemini-cli-extension",
"vendor": "atxp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.0.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Nguy\u1ec5n V\u0103n Ti\u1ebfn"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-23T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "ATXP Gemini CLI extension through 1.0.0 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in runAtxp() that allows attackers to execute shell commands through unsanitized MCP tool parameters. Attackers can plant instructions in email or SMS content to inject $() or backtick substitutions into parameters like message_id, subject, or query, running commands as the user."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-27T13:07:55.594Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Issue #15",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/atxp-dev/atxp/issues/15"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/atxp-dev/atxp"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/atxp-dev/atxp/blob/4e88b0282b51ae7c22ea1b6ca4476a39298299ff/src/server.ts#L28-L40"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: ATXP Gemini CLI Extension through 1.0.0 OS Command Injection via MCP Tools",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/atxp-gemini-cli-extension-through-1.0.0-os-command-injection-via-mcp-tools"
}
],
"title": "ATXP Gemini CLI Extension through 1.0.0 OS Command Injection via MCP Tools",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-117560",
"datePublished": "2026-10-27T13:07:55.594Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-27T11:25:22.543Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-28T16:17:06.328Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-117559 (GCVE-0-2026-117559)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-27 13:07 – Updated: 2026-11-02 19:14
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
DroidMind through 0.4.0 Command Injection via Shell Allowlist Bypass
Summary
DroidMind through 0.4.0 contains a command injection vulnerability that allows MCP clients to bypass the shell command allowlist by using $(...) or backtick substitution. Attackers, including prompt-injected agents, can inject commands through parameters interpolated into Device.run_shell() or unvalidated Device.list_directory() to run blocked commands such as reboot on connected Android devices.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-11-02 19:13 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
VulnCheck
CNA
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/hyperb1iss/droidmind/issues/17 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/hyperb1iss/droidmind | product |
| https://github.com/hyperb1iss/droidmind/blob/v0.4… | technical-description |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/droidmind-th… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| hyperb1iss | droidmind |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 0.4.0
(semver)
|
Date Public
2026-10-26 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-117559",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-02T19:13:40.607247Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-02T19:14:40.415Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hyperb1iss/droidmind/issues/17"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:pypi/droidmind",
"product": "droidmind",
"vendor": "hyperb1iss",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "0.4.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-26T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "DroidMind through 0.4.0 contains a command injection vulnerability that allows MCP clients to bypass the shell command allowlist by using $(...) or backtick substitution. Attackers, including prompt-injected agents, can inject commands through parameters interpolated into Device.run_shell() or unvalidated Device.list_directory() to run blocked commands such as reboot on connected Android devices."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-27T13:07:53.788Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Issue #17",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hyperb1iss/droidmind/issues/17"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hyperb1iss/droidmind"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hyperb1iss/droidmind/blob/v0.4.0/droidmind/security.py#L338-L402"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: DroidMind through 0.4.0 Command Injection via Shell Allowlist Bypass",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/droidmind-through-0.4.0-command-injection-via-shell-allowlist-bypass"
}
],
"title": "DroidMind through 0.4.0 Command Injection via Shell Allowlist Bypass",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-117559",
"datePublished": "2026-10-27T13:07:53.788Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-27T11:25:22.152Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-02T19:14:40.415Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-117558 (GCVE-0-2026-117558)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-27 13:07 – Updated: 2026-11-02 15:56
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
ai-sdlc MCP Server through 0.31.2 Command Injection via check_issue and check_pr_status
Summary
The ai-sdlc plugin MCP server through 0.31.2 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to execute commands by supplying shell metacharacters in the repo argument. The unvalidated repo value is interpolated into gh issue view or gh pr view commands run via execSync(), letting prompt-injected agents execute commands as the MCP server user.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-11-02 15:55 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
VulnCheck
CNA
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/ai-sdlc-framework/ai-sdlc/issu… | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/ai-sdlc-framework/ai-sdlc | product |
| https://github.com/ai-sdlc-framework/ai-sdlc/comm… | patch |
| https://github.com/ai-sdlc-framework/ai-sdlc/blob… | technical-description |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/ai-sdlc-mcp-… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ai-sdlc-framework | ai-sdlc |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 0.31.2
(semver)
|
Date Public
2026-10-23 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-117558",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-02T15:55:01.072019Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-02T15:56:03.121Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ai-sdlc-framework/ai-sdlc/issues/1970"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/%40ai-sdlc/plugin-mcp-server",
"product": "ai-sdlc",
"vendor": "ai-sdlc-framework",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "0.31.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-23T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The ai-sdlc plugin MCP server through 0.31.2 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows attackers to execute commands by supplying shell metacharacters in the repo argument. The unvalidated repo value is interpolated into gh issue view or gh pr view commands run via execSync(), letting prompt-injected agents execute commands as the MCP server user."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 8.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-27T13:07:53.099Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Issue #1970",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ai-sdlc-framework/ai-sdlc/issues/1970"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ai-sdlc-framework/ai-sdlc"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ai-sdlc-framework/ai-sdlc/commit/717d7ecf068b714f65955e50fcf5cb4f9a0b5070"
},
{
"tags": [
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ai-sdlc-framework/ai-sdlc/blob/ai-sdlc-plugin-v0.31.2/ai-sdlc-plugin/mcp-server/src/tools/check-issue.ts#L15-L19"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: ai-sdlc MCP Server through 0.31.2 Command Injection via check_issue and check_pr_status",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/ai-sdlc-mcp-server-through-0.31.2-command-injection-via-check-issue-and-check-pr-status"
}
],
"title": "ai-sdlc MCP Server through 0.31.2 Command Injection via check_issue and check_pr_status",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-117558",
"datePublished": "2026-10-27T13:07:53.099Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-27T11:25:21.756Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-02T15:56:03.121Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-117511 (GCVE-0-2026-117511)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-27 16:00 – Updated: 2026-11-02 19:26
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
desmondmorris node-tesseract Command Builder tesseract.js process os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in desmondmorris node-tesseract up to 0.2.7. Affected by this issue is the function process of the file lib/tesseract.js of the component Command Builder. Such manipulation of the argument image leads to os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-11-02 19:25 UTC
Assigner
VulDB
CNA
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/427077 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/vuln/427077/cti | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-117511 | third-party-advisory |
| https://vuldb.com/submit/1024535 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/desmondmorris/node-tesseract/i… | exploitissue-tracking |
| https://github.com/desmondmorris/node-tesseract/ | product |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| desmondmorris | node-tesseract |
Affected:
0.2.0
Affected: 0.2.1 Affected: 0.2.2 Affected: 0.2.3 Affected: 0.2.4 Affected: 0.2.5 Affected: 0.2.6 Affected: 0.2.7 cpe:2.3:a:desmondmorris:node-tesseract:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-117511",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-02T19:25:54.842651Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-02T19:26:28.971Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:desmondmorris:node-tesseract:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"modules": [
"Command Builder"
],
"product": "node-tesseract",
"vendor": "desmondmorris",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.7"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "ma1ware (VulDB User)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "VulDB CNA Team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability has been found in desmondmorris node-tesseract up to 0.2.7. Affected by this issue is the function process of the file lib/tesseract.js of the component Command Builder. Such manipulation of the argument image leads to os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:C",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:C",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-27T16:00:16.451Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-427077 | desmondmorris node-tesseract Command Builder tesseract.js process os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/427077"
},
{
"name": "VDB-427077 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/427077/cti"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-117511 | CVE Analysis and Report",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-117511"
},
{
"name": "Submit #1024535 | Desmond Morris node-tesseract 0.0.1-0.2.7 OS Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/1024535"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit",
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/desmondmorris/node-tesseract/issues/72"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/desmondmorris/node-tesseract/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-27T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-27T01:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-27T10:06:11.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "desmondmorris node-tesseract Command Builder tesseract.js process os command injection",
"x_generator": [
"VulDB PVTS v202610"
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-117511",
"datePublished": "2026-10-27T16:00:16.451Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-27T09:00:38.622Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-02T19:26:28.971Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-116958 (GCVE-0-2026-116958)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-02 20:59 – Updated: 2026-11-03 13:25
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Konflux-ci: unquoted variable expansion in shell command execution
Summary
A flaw was found in konflux-ci. This vulnerability allows arbitrary code execution due to improper quoting of shell variables in deployment scripts. A local attacker who can supply arguments to the affected scripts could exploit this issue to trigger unintended command substitution, executing commands with the privileges of the deployment runner.
Severity
6.7 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-11-03 13:24 UTC
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command
Assigner
redhat
CNA
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-116958 | vdb-entryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2564198 | issue-trackingx_refsource_REDHAT |
Date Public
2026-10-30 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-116958",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-03T13:24:48.183179Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-03T13:25:07.586Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com/konflux-ci/konflux-ci",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "konflux-ci",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.3-rc.0"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Red Hat would like to thank EVIL0RD (GitHub: https://github.com/EVIL0RD - warlockdarkarmy@gmail.com) for reporting this issue."
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-10-30T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in konflux-ci. This vulnerability allows arbitrary code execution due to improper quoting of shell variables in deployment scripts. A local attacker who can supply arguments to the affected scripts could exploit this issue to trigger unintended command substitution, executing commands with the privileges of the deployment runner."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Moderate"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-02T20:59:48.595Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-116958"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2564198",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2564198"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-30T17:20:48.840Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-10-30T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "Konflux-ci: unquoted variable expansion in shell command execution",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
},
"x_redhatCweChain": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-116958",
"datePublished": "2026-11-02T20:59:48.595Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-29T22:56:15.437Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-03T13:25:07.586Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-116779 (GCVE-0-2026-116779)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-05 19:30 – Updated: 2026-11-09 20:58
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
FreeSWITCH: Inbound SIP MESSAGE can select the api chat proto and run FreeSWITCH API commands
Summary
FreeSWITCH is a Software Defined Telecom Stack enabling the digital transformation from proprietary telecom switches to a software implementation that runs on any commodity hardware. Prior to 1.11.3, sofia_presence_handle_sip_i_message() split the To user of an inbound SIP MESSAGE on a plus sign and treated the left side as a chat protocol selector. Selecting the api chat proto reached switch_api_execute(), allowing a peer whose MESSAGE was accepted to run FreeSWITCH API commands, including operating-system command sinks, with the daemon's privileges. Inbound chat is enabled on the stock internal and external profiles, and any authenticated profile account is sufficient; stock directory users without password material can also remove that barrier in affected configurations. The flaw permits configuration and credential disclosure, arbitrary call control, and command execution, and exploitation has been observed in the wild. This issue is fixed in version 1.11.3.
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: active
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-11-09 16:50 UTC
CWE
Assigner
GitHub_M
CNA
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/security… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/pull/3135 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/commit/7… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/releases… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilit… | government-resource |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| signalwire | freeswitch |
Affected:
< 1.11.3
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-116779",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "active"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-11-09T16:50:26.568108Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"dateAdded": "2026-11-09",
"reference": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-116779"
},
"type": "kev"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-09T20:58:24.393Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"government-resource"
],
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-116779"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-11-09T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "CVE-2026-116779 added to CISA KEV"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "freeswitch",
"vendor": "signalwire",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.11.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "FreeSWITCH is a Software Defined Telecom Stack enabling the digital transformation from proprietary telecom switches to a software implementation that runs on any commodity hardware. Prior to 1.11.3, sofia_presence_handle_sip_i_message() split the To user of an inbound SIP MESSAGE on a plus sign and treated the left side as a chat protocol selector. Selecting the api chat proto reached switch_api_execute(), allowing a peer whose MESSAGE was accepted to run FreeSWITCH API commands, including operating-system command sinks, with the daemon\u0027s privileges. Inbound chat is enabled on the stock internal and external profiles, and any authenticated profile account is sufficient; stock directory users without password material can also remove that barrier in affected configurations. The flaw permits configuration and credential disclosure, arbitrary call control, and command execution, and exploitation has been observed in the wild. This issue is fixed in version 1.11.3."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-749",
"description": "CWE-749: Exposed Dangerous Method or Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T19:30:25.492Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/security/advisories/GHSA-mg63-h38w-8p9p",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/security/advisories/GHSA-mg63-h38w-8p9p"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/pull/3135",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/pull/3135"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/commit/7015f6a73ab3d67fed5fbfc277ecfb88a74c2a86",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/commit/7015f6a73ab3d67fed5fbfc277ecfb88a74c2a86"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/releases/tag/v1.11.3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/signalwire/freeswitch/releases/tag/v1.11.3"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-mg63-h38w-8p9p",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "FreeSWITCH: Inbound SIP MESSAGE can select the api chat proto and run FreeSWITCH API commands"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-116779",
"datePublished": "2026-11-05T19:30:25.492Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-26T21:53:35.166Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-09T20:58:24.393Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-116778 (GCVE-0-2026-116778)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-28 15:49 – Updated: 2026-10-28 16:06
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
FOG: Authenticated low-privileged API user can modify Storage Nodes and reach root command execution
Summary
FOG is a free open-source cloning/imaging/rescue suite/inventory management system. Prior to 1.5.10.2253 and 1.6.0-RC-1, an authenticated API-enabled user with uType=1 who possesses both the user's API token and the global FOG API token can use PUT /fog/storagenode/{id}/edit to modify Storage Node user, pass, and ftppath fields because the API validates the credentials but does not enforce an administrator-only role. With storage replication enabled and a usable Storage Node, FOGImageReplicator interpolates those fields into an lftp command executed through proc_open() by the root-running service, allowing the low-privileged user to execute commands as root. This issue is fixed in versions 1.5.10.2253 and 1.6.0-RC-1.
Severity
8.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-28 16:05 UTC
CWE
Assigner
GitHub_M
CNA
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/security… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/pull/1001 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/commit/3… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/commit/a… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/releases… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/releases… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FOGProject | fogproject |
Affected:
< 1.5.10.2253
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-116778",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-28T16:05:07.319872Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-28T16:06:35.677Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "fogproject",
"vendor": "FOGProject",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.5.10.2253"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "FOG is a free open-source cloning/imaging/rescue suite/inventory management system. Prior to 1.5.10.2253 and 1.6.0-RC-1, an authenticated API-enabled user with uType=1 who possesses both the user\u0027s API token and the global FOG API token can use PUT /fog/storagenode/{id}/edit to modify Storage Node user, pass, and ftppath fields because the API validates the credentials but does not enforce an administrator-only role. With storage replication enabled and a usable Storage Node, FOGImageReplicator interpolates those fields into an lftp command executed through proc_open() by the root-running service, allowing the low-privileged user to execute commands as root. This issue is fixed in versions 1.5.10.2253 and 1.6.0-RC-1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-862",
"description": "CWE-862: Missing Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-28T15:49:59.899Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/security/advisories/GHSA-2hqx-5ffg-w4c3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/security/advisories/GHSA-2hqx-5ffg-w4c3"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/pull/1001",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/pull/1001"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/commit/3098e4423588951d8f0cedac79b9b102f036761e",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/commit/3098e4423588951d8f0cedac79b9b102f036761e"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/commit/aeda5bc536e3eec0200366d6b109a66798abc438",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/commit/aeda5bc536e3eec0200366d6b109a66798abc438"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/releases/tag/1.5.10.2253",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/releases/tag/1.5.10.2253"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/releases/tag/1.6.0-RC-1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/releases/tag/1.6.0-RC-1"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-2hqx-5ffg-w4c3",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "FOG: Authenticated low-privileged API user can modify Storage Nodes and reach root command execution"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-116778",
"datePublished": "2026-10-28T15:49:59.899Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-26T21:53:35.166Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-28T16:06:35.677Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation MIT-22
Architecture and Design
Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Mitigation MIT-15
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation MIT-4.3
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Mitigation MIT-28
Implementation
Strategy: Output Encoding
While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
Mitigation
Implementation
If the program to be executed allows arguments to be specified within an input file or from standard input, then consider using that mode to pass arguments instead of the command line.
Mitigation MIT-27
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Parameterization
- If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Some languages offer multiple functions that can be used to invoke commands. Where possible, identify any function that invokes a command shell using a single string, and replace it with a function that requires individual arguments. These functions typically perform appropriate quoting and filtering of arguments. For example, in C, the system() function accepts a string that contains the entire command to be executed, whereas execl(), execve(), and others require an array of strings, one for each argument. In Windows, CreateProcess() only accepts one command at a time. In Perl, if system() is provided with an array of arguments, then it will quote each of the arguments.
Mitigation MIT-5
Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When constructing OS command strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing OS command injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent OS command injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, when invoking a mail program, you might need to allow the subject field to contain otherwise-dangerous inputs like ";" and ">" characters, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the character might reduce the risk of OS command injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the subject field would not be recorded as the user intended. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it could be more important when the program relies on well-structured subject lines in order to pass messages to other components.
- Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
Mitigation MIT-21
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation MIT-32
Operation
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-39
Implementation
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- In the context of OS Command Injection, error information passed back to the user might reveal whether an OS command is being executed and possibly which command is being used.
Mitigation
Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Use runtime policy enforcement to create an allowlist of allowable commands, then prevent use of any command that does not appear in the allowlist. Technologies such as AppArmor are available to do this.
Mitigation MIT-29
Operation
Strategy: Firewall
Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
Mitigation MIT-17
Architecture and Design
Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation MIT-16
Operation
Implementation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-6: Argument Injection
An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection
In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.