JVNDB-2026-000165

Vulnerability from jvndb - Published: 2026-11-04 05:26 - Updated:2026-11-04 05:26
Severity
Summary
Akeeba multiple products vulnerable to cross-site request forgery
Details
Multiple products provided by Akeeba Ltd. fail to check properly the anti-CSRF tokens on some actions.
  • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CWE-352) - CVE-2026-105296
Kuniyoshi Noguchi @KuniNogu reported the vulnerability on Akeeba Backup for Joomla! to IPA. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership. The developer found the vulnerability independently of our reporting and was progressing to release each fixed version.
Show details on JVN DB website

{
  "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2026/JVNDB-2026-000165.html",
  "dc:date": "2026-11-04T14:26+09:00",
  "dcterms:issued": "2026-11-04T14:26+09:00",
  "dcterms:modified": "2026-11-04T14:26+09:00",
  "description": "Multiple products provided by Akeeba Ltd. fail to check properly the anti-CSRF tokens on some actions.\u003ca href=\u0027https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/352.html\u0027 target=\u0027_blank\u0027\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eCross-Site Request Forgery (CWE-352) - CVE-2026-105296\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003eKuniyoshi Noguchi @KuniNogu reported the vulnerability on Akeeba Backup for Joomla! to IPA.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.\r\n\r\nThe developer found the vulnerability independently of our reporting and was progressing to release each fixed version.",
  "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2026/JVNDB-2026-000165.html",
  "sec:cpe": [
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:akeeba:admin_tools_for_joomla",
      "@product": "Admin Tools for Joomla!",
      "@vendor": "Akeeba",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:akeeba:akeeba_backup_for_joomla",
      "@product": "Akeeba Backup for Joomla!",
      "@vendor": "Akeeba",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:akeeba:akeeba_backup_for_wordpress",
      "@product": "Akeeba Backup for WordPress",
      "@vendor": "Akeeba",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:akeeba:akeeba_solo",
      "@product": "Akeeba Solo",
      "@vendor": "Akeeba",
      "@version": "2.2"
    }
  ],
  "sec:cvss": {
    "@score": "5.4",
    "@severity": "Medium",
    "@type": "Base",
    "@vector": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
    "@version": "3.0"
  },
  "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2026-000165",
  "sec:references": [
    {
      "#text": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN44272550/index.html",
      "@id": "JVN#44272550",
      "@source": "JVN"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-105296",
      "@id": "CVE-2026-105296",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
      "@id": "CWE-352",
      "@title": "Cross-Site Request Forgery(CWE-352)"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Akeeba multiple products vulnerable to cross-site request forgery"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.