CVE-2026-99119 (GCVE-0-2026-99119)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-10-28 10:34
Modified
2026-10-28 10:34
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/userq: actually validate userq BOs
This was supposed to loop over the individual evicted list, as the
kernel and always_valid evicted lists were already handled in
amdgpu_vm_validate.
Without this, BOs that were created and evicted before a userq was made
would never end up in an eviction fence rearm.
Also add the missing ref to the BO before drm_exec locks and refs it.
(cherry picked from commit 18decfc9e8cc0fa70b6de9944cc27a37729edfbd)
References
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "d1d6b859e89dd274cd0fae77503cdf91be8310c0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4cdbba5a16aaf16513b69cc332b1d6f971a44b52",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "32d0771ef4ca69c30a1db3aefa34dd177cd2a047",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4cdbba5a16aaf16513b69cc332b1d6f971a44b52",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2"
},
{
"lessThan": "7.2",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.2.13",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.3",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "7.2.13",
"versionStartIncluding": "7.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "7.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "7.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amdgpu/userq: actually validate userq BOs\n\nThis was supposed to loop over the individual evicted list, as the\nkernel and always_valid evicted lists were already handled in\namdgpu_vm_validate.\n\nWithout this, BOs that were created and evicted before a userq was made\nwould never end up in an eviction fence rearm.\n\nAlso add the missing ref to the BO before drm_exec locks and refs it.\n\n(cherry picked from commit 18decfc9e8cc0fa70b6de9944cc27a37729edfbd)"
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-28T10:34:35.364Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1d6b859e89dd274cd0fae77503cdf91be8310c0"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/32d0771ef4ca69c30a1db3aefa34dd177cd2a047"
}
],
"title": "drm/amdgpu/userq: actually validate userq BOs",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-99119",
"datePublished": "2026-10-28T10:34:35.364Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-25T10:25:14.393Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-28T10:34:35.364Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…