CVE-2026-92683 (GCVE-0-2026-92683)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-09 09:43 – Updated: 2026-11-09 09:43
VLAI
Title
Incomplete evaluation of multi-condition JWT where filter in @authentication in @neo4j/graphql
Summary
Incorrect authorization in the @authentication directive JWT where filter evaluation in Neo4j @neo4j/graphql versions 7.0.0 before 7.6.7 allows an attacker holding an otherwise-valid JWT to bypass all but the first filter condition via a multi-condition jwt where filter written in generic operator syntax.
CWE
  • CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization
Assigner
Neo4j CNA
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Neo4j @neo4j/graphql Affected: 7.0.0 , < 7.6.7 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://registry.npmjs.org",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "@neo4j/graphql",
          "product": "@neo4j/graphql",
          "repo": "https://github.com/neo4j/graphql",
          "vendor": "Neo4j",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "7.6.7",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Incorrect authorization in the @authentication directive JWT where filter evaluation in Neo4j @neo4j/graphql versions 7.0.0 before 7.6.7 allows an attacker holding an otherwise-valid JWT to bypass all but the first filter condition via a multi-condition jwt where filter written in generic operator syntax."
            }
          ],
          "value": "Incorrect authorization in the @authentication directive JWT where filter evaluation in Neo4j @neo4j/graphql versions 7.0.0 before 7.6.7 allows an attacker holding an otherwise-valid JWT to bypass all but the first filter condition via a multi-condition jwt where filter written in generic operator syntax."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Authorization bypass: JWT claim requirements beyond the first condition (such as a required role) are not enforced, allowing access to data or operations protected by @authentication."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 8.6,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-863",
              "description": "CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-11-09T09:43:18.366Z",
        "orgId": "3b236295-4ccd-4a1f-a1c1-a72eecc8d7b6",
        "shortName": "Neo4j"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/security/advisories/GHSA-58qp-3mmm-5vh8"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Upgrade \u003ctt\u003e@neo4j/graphql\u003c/tt\u003e to version 7.6.7 or later."
            }
          ],
          "value": "Upgrade @neo4j/graphql to version 7.6.7 or later."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "INTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Incomplete evaluation of multi-condition JWT where filter in @authentication in @neo4j/graphql",
      "workarounds": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "For versions prior to 7.6.7, express multi-condition \u003ctt\u003ejwt\u003c/tt\u003e \u003ctt\u003ewhere\u003c/tt\u003e filters either with an explicit \u003ctt\u003eAND\u003c/tt\u003e array (for example \u003ctt\u003ejwt: { AND: [{ iss: { eq: \"https://idp.example.com\" } }, { roles: { includes: \"admin\" } }] }\u003c/tt\u003e) or with the inline operator syntax (for example \u003ctt\u003eroles_INCLUDES: \"admin\"\u003c/tt\u003e). Both forms evaluate all conditions."
            }
          ],
          "value": "For versions prior to 7.6.7, express multi-condition jwt where filters either with an explicit AND array (for example jwt: { AND: [{ iss: { eq: \"https://idp.example.com\" } }, { roles: { includes: \"admin\" } }] }) or with the inline operator syntax (for example roles_INCLUDES: \"admin\"). Both forms evaluate all conditions."
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "3b236295-4ccd-4a1f-a1c1-a72eecc8d7b6",
    "assignerShortName": "Neo4j",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-92683",
    "datePublished": "2026-11-09T09:43:18.366Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-16T16:17:17.929Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-11-09T09:43:18.366Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.