CVE-2026-92682 (GCVE-0-2026-92682)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-10-12 15:07
Modified
2026-10-16 17:27
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization
Summary
In @neo4j/graphql versions from 7.0.0 up to but not including 7.6.4, the none quantifier in @authorization filters on relationships and connections is not negated when translated to Cypher, so it behaves like some. A rule such as "none of the related denied users matches the JWT subject" therefore returns exactly the records it was meant to exclude, and excludes those it was meant to return. An authenticated user whom such a rule is meant to deny can read the protected records. This is also the case for mutations, so the impact is that sensitive data could also be created and deleted by users that shouldn't have access according to the typedefs. Fixed in 7.6.4.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neo4j | @neo4j/graphql |
Version: 7.0.0 ≤ |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-92682",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-16T17:26:13.854948Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T17:27:47.458Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://registry.npmjs.org",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "@neo4j/graphql",
"product": "@neo4j/graphql",
"repo": "https://github.com/neo4j/graphql",
"vendor": "Neo4j",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7.6.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Neo4j Application Security team"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "In @neo4j/graphql versions from 7.0.0 up to but not including 7.6.4, the \u003ccode\u003enone\u003c/code\u003e quantifier in \u003ccode\u003e@authorization\u003c/code\u003e filters on relationships and connections is not negated when translated to Cypher, so it behaves like \u003ccode\u003esome\u003c/code\u003e. A rule such as \"none of the related denied users matches the JWT subject\" therefore returns exactly the records it was meant to exclude, and excludes those it was meant to return. An authenticated user whom such a rule is meant to deny can read the protected records. This is also the case for mutations, so the impact is that sensitive data could also be created and deleted by users that shouldn\u0027t have access according to the typedefs. Fixed in 7.6.4."
}
],
"value": "In @neo4j/graphql versions from 7.0.0 up to but not including 7.6.4, the none quantifier in @authorization filters on relationships and connections is not negated when translated to Cypher, so it behaves like some. A rule such as \"none of the related denied users matches the JWT subject\" therefore returns exactly the records it was meant to exclude, and excludes those it was meant to return. An authenticated user whom such a rule is meant to deny can read the protected records. This is also the case for mutations, so the impact is that sensitive data could also be created and deleted by users that shouldn\u0027t have access according to the typedefs. Fixed in 7.6.4."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T15:07:44.638Z",
"orgId": "3b236295-4ccd-4a1f-a1c1-a72eecc8d7b6",
"shortName": "Neo4j"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GHSA-h873-p2wr-fjx6",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/security/advisories/GHSA-h873-p2wr-fjx6"
},
{
"name": "Fix commit 17650cc",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/commit/17650cc370445a6bb9d394d34063d3623e987aa2"
},
{
"name": "@neo4j/graphql 7.6.4 release notes",
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/releases/tag/%40neo4j%2Fgraphql%407.6.4"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.npmjs.com/package/@neo4j/graphql"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eUpgrade @neo4j/graphql to version 7.6.4 or later.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Upgrade @neo4j/graphql to version 7.6.4 or later."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "@neo4j/graphql: authorization relationship and connection filters invert the \"none\" quantifier",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAvoid the none quantifier in @authorization relationship and connection filters until you can upgrade, and verify any replacement rule with tests that cover both denied and allowed users.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Avoid the none quantifier in @authorization relationship and connection filters until you can upgrade, and verify any replacement rule with tests that cover both denied and allowed users."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3b236295-4ccd-4a1f-a1c1-a72eecc8d7b6",
"assignerShortName": "Neo4j",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-92682",
"datePublished": "2026-10-12T15:07:44.638Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-16T16:17:17.929Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-16T17:27:47.458Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-92682\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-10-16T17:26:13.854948Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-16T17:27:03.095Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"@neo4j/graphql: authorization relationship and connection filters invert the \\\"none\\\" quantifier\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"INTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Neo4j Application Security team\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"Recovery\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"baseScore\": 8.6, \"Automatable\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"exploitMaturity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"repo\": \"https://github.com/neo4j/graphql\", \"vendor\": \"Neo4j\", \"product\": \"@neo4j/graphql\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"7.0.0\", \"lessThan\": \"7.6.4\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"packageName\": \"@neo4j/graphql\", \"collectionURL\": \"https://registry.npmjs.org\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"solutions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Upgrade @neo4j/graphql to version 7.6.4 or later.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eUpgrade @neo4j/graphql to version 7.6.4 or later.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/security/advisories/GHSA-h873-p2wr-fjx6\", \"name\": \"GHSA-h873-p2wr-fjx6\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/commit/17650cc370445a6bb9d394d34063d3623e987aa2\", \"name\": \"Fix commit 17650cc\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/releases/tag/%40neo4j%2Fgraphql%407.6.4\", \"name\": \"@neo4j/graphql 7.6.4 release notes\", \"tags\": [\"release-notes\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.npmjs.com/package/@neo4j/graphql\", \"tags\": [\"product\"]}], \"workarounds\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Avoid the none quantifier in @authorization relationship and connection filters until you can upgrade, and verify any replacement rule with tests that cover both denied and allowed users.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eAvoid the none quantifier in @authorization relationship and connection filters until you can upgrade, and verify any replacement rule with tests that cover both denied and allowed users.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 1.0.5\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"In @neo4j/graphql versions from 7.0.0 up to but not including 7.6.4, the none quantifier in @authorization filters on relationships and connections is not negated when translated to Cypher, so it behaves like some. A rule such as \\\"none of the related denied users matches the JWT subject\\\" therefore returns exactly the records it was meant to exclude, and excludes those it was meant to return. An authenticated user whom such a rule is meant to deny can read the protected records. This is also the case for mutations, so the impact is that sensitive data could also be created and deleted by users that shouldn\u0027t have access according to the typedefs. Fixed in 7.6.4.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"In @neo4j/graphql versions from 7.0.0 up to but not including 7.6.4, the \u003ccode\u003enone\u003c/code\u003e quantifier in \u003ccode\u003e@authorization\u003c/code\u003e filters on relationships and connections is not negated when translated to Cypher, so it behaves like \u003ccode\u003esome\u003c/code\u003e. A rule such as \\\"none of the related denied users matches the JWT subject\\\" therefore returns exactly the records it was meant to exclude, and excludes those it was meant to return. An authenticated user whom such a rule is meant to deny can read the protected records. This is also the case for mutations, so the impact is that sensitive data could also be created and deleted by users that shouldn\u0027t have access according to the typedefs. Fixed in 7.6.4.\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-863\", \"description\": \"CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"3b236295-4ccd-4a1f-a1c1-a72eecc8d7b6\", \"shortName\": \"Neo4j\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-12T15:07:44.638Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-92682\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-16T17:27:47.458Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-09-16T16:17:17.929Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"3b236295-4ccd-4a1f-a1c1-a72eecc8d7b6\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-10-12T15:07:44.638Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"Neo4j\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…