{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-92087",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-17T19:10:08.336484Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-17T19:10:19.438Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageURL": "pkg:npm/@fastify/auth",
          "product": "@fastify/auth",
          "vendor": "@fastify/auth",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "5.1.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "5.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "5.1.1",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Sengtocxoen"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "UlisesGascon"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation reviewer",
          "value": "mcollina"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "@fastify/auth is a Fastify plugin that composes multiple authentication and authorization strategies into a single route guard. In versions 5.0.0 through 5.1.0, when strategies are composed with the relation \"or\" option together with the run \"all\" option and one entry is a nested array acting as an AND group, the group is evaluated in an order-dependent way: an earlier failing check is silently dropped and the group\u0027s result becomes the outcome of its last check. As a result, a request that satisfies only the last member of an AND group, for example an attacker who holds a valid API key but is not an administrator, is authorized instead of rejected, and a related order-dependent bypass affects the mirror configuration where the top-level relation is \"and\" and a nested group uses \"or\". The issue is fixed in @fastify/auth 5.1.1, and users should upgrade to 5.1.1 or later. As a workaround, omit the run \"all\" option where it is not required, order each AND group so its stricter check is evaluated last, or replace nested AND groups with an explicit top-level \"and\" composition."
            }
          ],
          "value": "@fastify/auth is a Fastify plugin that composes multiple authentication and authorization strategies into a single route guard. In versions 5.0.0 through 5.1.0, when strategies are composed with the relation \"or\" option together with the run \"all\" option and one entry is a nested array acting as an AND group, the group is evaluated in an order-dependent way: an earlier failing check is silently dropped and the group\u0027s result becomes the outcome of its last check. As a result, a request that satisfies only the last member of an AND group, for example an attacker who holds a valid API key but is not an administrator, is authorized instead of rejected, and a related order-dependent bypass affects the mirror configuration where the top-level relation is \"and\" and a nested group uses \"or\". The issue is fixed in @fastify/auth 5.1.1, and users should upgrade to 5.1.1 or later. As a workaround, omit the run \"all\" option where it is not required, order each AND group so its stricter check is evaluated last, or replace nested AND groups with an explicit top-level \"and\" composition."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 8.1,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-285",
              "description": "CWE-285: Improper Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-697",
              "description": "CWE-697: Incorrect Comparison",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T14:21:23.686Z",
        "orgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
        "shortName": "openjs"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/fastify/fastify-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-7h52-2rwr-m76r"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
        }
      ],
      "title": "@fastify/auth vulnerable to Authorization Bypass via order-dependent evaluation of composed auth",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "cve-kit 1.0.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
    "assignerShortName": "openjs",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-92087",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-16T14:21:23.686Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-15T13:56:18.212Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-17T19:10:19.438Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-92087\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-09-17T19:10:08.336484Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-17T19:10:13.895Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"@fastify/auth vulnerable to Authorization Bypass via order-dependent evaluation of composed auth\", \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"reporter\", \"value\": \"Sengtocxoen\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation developer\", \"value\": \"UlisesGascon\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation reviewer\", \"value\": \"mcollina\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 8.1, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"@fastify/auth\", \"product\": \"@fastify/auth\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"5.0.0\", \"lessThan\": \"5.1.1\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"5.1.1\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"packageURL\": \"pkg:npm/@fastify/auth\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/fastify/fastify-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-7h52-2rwr-m76r\"}, {\"url\": \"https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"cve-kit 1.0.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"@fastify/auth is a Fastify plugin that composes multiple authentication and authorization strategies into a single route guard. In versions 5.0.0 through 5.1.0, when strategies are composed with the relation \\\"or\\\" option together with the run \\\"all\\\" option and one entry is a nested array acting as an AND group, the group is evaluated in an order-dependent way: an earlier failing check is silently dropped and the group\u0027s result becomes the outcome of its last check. As a result, a request that satisfies only the last member of an AND group, for example an attacker who holds a valid API key but is not an administrator, is authorized instead of rejected, and a related order-dependent bypass affects the mirror configuration where the top-level relation is \\\"and\\\" and a nested group uses \\\"or\\\". The issue is fixed in @fastify/auth 5.1.1, and users should upgrade to 5.1.1 or later. As a workaround, omit the run \\\"all\\\" option where it is not required, order each AND group so its stricter check is evaluated last, or replace nested AND groups with an explicit top-level \\\"and\\\" composition.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"@fastify/auth is a Fastify plugin that composes multiple authentication and authorization strategies into a single route guard. In versions 5.0.0 through 5.1.0, when strategies are composed with the relation \\\"or\\\" option together with the run \\\"all\\\" option and one entry is a nested array acting as an AND group, the group is evaluated in an order-dependent way: an earlier failing check is silently dropped and the group\u0027s result becomes the outcome of its last check. As a result, a request that satisfies only the last member of an AND group, for example an attacker who holds a valid API key but is not an administrator, is authorized instead of rejected, and a related order-dependent bypass affects the mirror configuration where the top-level relation is \\\"and\\\" and a nested group uses \\\"or\\\". The issue is fixed in @fastify/auth 5.1.1, and users should upgrade to 5.1.1 or later. As a workaround, omit the run \\\"all\\\" option where it is not required, order each AND group so its stricter check is evaluated last, or replace nested AND groups with an explicit top-level \\\"and\\\" composition.\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-285\", \"description\": \"CWE-285: Improper Authorization\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-697\", \"description\": \"CWE-697: Incorrect Comparison\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\", \"shortName\": \"openjs\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-16T14:21:23.686Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-92087\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-17T19:10:19.438Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-09-15T13:56:18.212Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-09-16T14:21:23.686Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"openjs\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}