CVE-2026-9201 (GCVE-0-2026-9201)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-08-05 18:26
Modified
2026-08-17 18:07
CWE
  • CWE-326 - Inadequate Encryption Strength
Summary
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a cryptographic weakness in the custom component validation mechanism. When the optional hardening mode that restricts execution to trusted component templates is enabled, the application validates component code using a truncated SHA‑256 hash. Because the hash comparison relies on only a portion of the digest, an attacker can craft malicious component code that collides with a trusted template hash and bypasses validation. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to introduce and execute unauthorized Python code within the Langflow process, defeating the intended security control and potentially leading to full compromise of the affected instance.
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
IBM Langflow OSS Version: 1.0.0    1.10.3
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.10.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-9201",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-08-05T00:00:00+00:00",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-08-06T03:55:54.982Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
            "cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.10.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Langflow OSS",
          "vendor": "IBM",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "1.10.3",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "CVE-2026-9201 was reported to IBM by Harish Kolla (GitHub: Har1sh-k (https://github.com/Har1sh-k))."
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a cryptographic weakness in the custom component validation mechanism. When the optional hardening mode that restricts execution to trusted component templates is enabled, the application validates component code using a truncated SHA\u2011256 hash. Because the hash comparison relies on only a portion of the digest, an attacker can craft malicious component code that collides with a trusted template hash and bypasses validation. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to introduce and execute unauthorized Python code within the Langflow process, defeating the intended security control and potentially leading to full compromise of the affected instance.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a cryptographic weakness in the custom component validation mechanism. When the optional hardening mode that restricts execution to trusted component templates is enabled, the application validates component code using a truncated SHA\u2011256 hash. Because the hash comparison relies on only a portion of the digest, an attacker can craft malicious component code that collides with a trusted template hash and bypasses validation. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to introduce and execute unauthorized Python code within the Langflow process, defeating the intended security control and potentially leading to full compromise of the affected instance."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 8.8,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-326",
              "description": "CWE-326 Inadequate Encryption Strength",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-08-17T18:07:08.874Z",
        "orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
        "shortName": "ibm"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7282646"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM recommends upgrading to Langflow OSS 1.11.0 or newer \u003ca href=\"https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "IBM recommends upgrading to Langflow OSS 1.11.0 or newer  https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.4"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
    "assignerShortName": "ibm",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-9201",
    "datePublished": "2026-08-05T18:26:16.925Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-21T15:47:59.523Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-08-17T18:07:08.874Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-9201\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-08-05T19:19:43.973548Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-05T19:19:48.774Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling\", \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 8.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"cpes\": [\"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:1.10.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"], \"vendor\": \"IBM\", \"product\": \"Langflow OSS\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"1.0.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"1.10.3\"}]}], \"solutions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"IBM recommends upgrading to Langflow OSS 1.11.0 or newer  https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eIBM recommends upgrading to Langflow OSS 1.11.0 or newer \u003ca href=\\\"https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases\\\" rel=\\\"nofollow\\\"\u003ehttps://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7282646\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\", \"patch\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a cryptographic weakness in the custom component validation mechanism. When the optional hardening mode that restricts execution to trusted component templates is enabled, the application validates component code using a truncated SHA\\u2011256 hash. Because the hash comparison relies on only a portion of the digest, an attacker can craft malicious component code that collides with a trusted template hash and bypasses validation. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to introduce and execute unauthorized Python code within the Langflow process, defeating the intended security control and potentially leading to full compromise of the affected instance.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eIBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a cryptographic weakness in the custom component validation mechanism. When the optional hardening mode that restricts execution to trusted component templates is enabled, the application validates component code using a truncated SHA\\u2011256 hash. Because the hash comparison relies on only a portion of the digest, an attacker can craft malicious component code that collides with a trusted template hash and bypasses validation. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to introduce and execute unauthorized Python code within the Langflow process, defeating the intended security control and potentially leading to full compromise of the affected instance.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-326\", \"description\": \"CWE-326 Inadequate Encryption Strength\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522\", \"shortName\": \"ibm\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-05T18:26:16.925Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-9201\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-08-06T03:55:54.982Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-05-21T15:47:59.523Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-08-05T18:26:16.925Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"ibm\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…