CVE-2026-91769 (GCVE-0-2026-91769)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-09-25 20:59
Modified
2026-10-04 16:10
CWE
  • CWE-297 - Improper validation of certificate with host mismatch
Summary
PHP's OpenSSL stream peer verification checks the certificate's subjectAltName entries first and, whenever no entry matches, falls back to the Common Name. RFC 6125 requires the CN to be ignored once the certificate presents any service identity, so a certificate carrying a non-matching DNS SAN was still accepted when its CN matched the requested peer_name. A certificate trusted by the client for one name can therefore be used to impersonate another.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
PHP Group PHP Version: 8.2.*   ≤
Version: 8.3.*   ≤
Version: 8.4.*   ≤
Version: 8.5.*   ≤
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-91769",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-28T12:56:47.310384Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-28T13:31:31.508Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "ext-openssl",
          "product": "PHP",
          "vendor": "PHP Group",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "8.2.34",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.2.*",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "8.3.35",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.3.*",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "8.4.26",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.4.*",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "8.5.11",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.5.*",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Cantina (https://www.cantina.security/)"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "David Korczynski"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Jakub Zelenka"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation reviewer",
          "value": "Arnaud Le Blanc"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation reviewer",
          "value": "Alexandre Daubois"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "@benzdeus (GitHub)"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003ePHP\u0027s OpenSSL stream peer verification checks the certificate\u0027s subjectAltName entries first and, whenever no entry matches, falls back to the Common Name. RFC 6125 requires the CN to be ignored once the certificate presents any service identity, so a certificate carrying a non-matching DNS SAN was still accepted when its CN matched the requested \u003ccode\u003epeer_name\u003c/code\u003e. A certificate trusted by the client for one name can therefore be used to impersonate another.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "PHP\u0027s OpenSSL stream peer verification checks the certificate\u0027s subjectAltName entries first and, whenever no entry matches, falls back to the Common Name. RFC 6125 requires the CN to be ignored once the certificate presents any service identity, so a certificate carrying a non-matching DNS SAN was still accepted when its CN matched the requested peer_name. A certificate trusted by the client for one name can therefore be used to impersonate another."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-94",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-94"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 4.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-297",
              "description": "CWE-297 Improper validation of certificate with host mismatch",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-10-04T16:10:05.639Z",
        "orgId": "dd77f84a-d19a-4638-8c3d-a322d820ed2b",
        "shortName": "php"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/php/php-src/security/advisories/GHSA-vvx9-73fr-5jjx"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "TLS Hostname Verification Falls Back to CN After SAN Mismatch",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "dd77f84a-d19a-4638-8c3d-a322d820ed2b",
    "assignerShortName": "php",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-91769",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-25T20:59:39.727Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-15T00:44:10.816Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-10-04T16:10:05.639Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-91769\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-09-28T12:56:47.310384Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-28T13:24:43.572Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"TLS Hostname Verification Falls Back to CN After SAN Mismatch\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"reporter\", \"value\": \"Cantina (https://www.cantina.security/)\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"reporter\", \"value\": \"David Korczynski\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation developer\", \"value\": \"Jakub Zelenka\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation reviewer\", \"value\": \"Arnaud Le Blanc\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation reviewer\", \"value\": \"Alexandre Daubois\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"reporter\", \"value\": \"@benzdeus (GitHub)\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-94\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-94\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 4.3, \"attackVector\": \"ADJACENT_NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"PHP Group\", \"product\": \"PHP\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"8.2.*\", \"lessThan\": \"8.2.34\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"8.3.*\", \"lessThan\": \"8.3.35\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"8.4.*\", \"lessThan\": \"8.4.26\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"8.5.*\", \"lessThan\": \"8.5.11\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"packageName\": \"ext-openssl\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/php/php-src/security/advisories/GHSA-vvx9-73fr-5jjx\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 1.0.5\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"PHP\u0027s OpenSSL stream peer verification checks the certificate\u0027s subjectAltName entries first and, whenever no entry matches, falls back to the Common Name. RFC 6125 requires the CN to be ignored once the certificate presents any service identity, so a certificate carrying a non-matching DNS SAN was still accepted when its CN matched the requested peer_name. A certificate trusted by the client for one name can therefore be used to impersonate another.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003ePHP\u0027s OpenSSL stream peer verification checks the certificate\u0027s subjectAltName entries first and, whenever no entry matches, falls back to the Common Name. RFC 6125 requires the CN to be ignored once the certificate presents any service identity, so a certificate carrying a non-matching DNS SAN was still accepted when its CN matched the requested \u003ccode\u003epeer_name\u003c/code\u003e. A certificate trusted by the client for one name can therefore be used to impersonate another.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-297\", \"description\": \"CWE-297 Improper validation of certificate with host mismatch\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"dd77f84a-d19a-4638-8c3d-a322d820ed2b\", \"shortName\": \"php\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-04T16:10:05.639Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-91769\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-04T16:10:05.639Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-09-15T00:44:10.816Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"dd77f84a-d19a-4638-8c3d-a322d820ed2b\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-09-25T20:59:39.727Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"php\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…