CVE-2026-85738 (GCVE-0-2026-85738)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-09-24 18:09
Modified
2026-09-28 14:51
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Summary
TREK is a collaborative travel planner. Prior to 3.4.0, the checkSsrf logic in server/src/utils/ssrfGuard.ts does not recognize NAT64, 6to4, or Teredo IPv6 transition addresses that encode an IPv4 destination. An authenticated user who controls a DNS record can supply a URL whose AAAA result is a transition address embedding a private, loopback, or link-local IPv4 target, and isAlwaysBlocked and isPrivateNetwork classify the address as allowed. In a deployment that routes the applicable transition format, user-facing imports, webhooks, integrations, or plugin egress can reach internal services or cloud metadata and expose returned information. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-85738",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-28T14:51:50.053724Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-28T14:51:56.222Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/security/advisories/GHSA-9hpq-mrpx-mcxg"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "TREK",
"vendor": "liketrek",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.4.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "TREK is a collaborative travel planner. Prior to 3.4.0, the checkSsrf logic in server/src/utils/ssrfGuard.ts does not recognize NAT64, 6to4, or Teredo IPv6 transition addresses that encode an IPv4 destination. An authenticated user who controls a DNS record can supply a URL whose AAAA result is a transition address embedding a private, loopback, or link-local IPv4 target, and isAlwaysBlocked and isPrivateNetwork classify the address as allowed. In a deployment that routes the applicable transition format, user-facing imports, webhooks, integrations, or plugin egress can reach internal services or cloud metadata and expose returned information. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T18:09:31.268Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/security/advisories/GHSA-9hpq-mrpx-mcxg",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/security/advisories/GHSA-9hpq-mrpx-mcxg"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/pull/1540",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/pull/1540"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/commit/a2bd9be184a94997105ce190dad920c41e7b10df",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/commit/a2bd9be184a94997105ce190dad920c41e7b10df"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/releases/tag/v3.4.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/releases/tag/v3.4.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-9hpq-mrpx-mcxg",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "TREK: SSRF Guard Bypass via IPv6 Transition Addresses (NAT64/6to4)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-85738",
"datePublished": "2026-09-24T18:09:31.268Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-04T14:50:16.719Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-28T14:51:56.222Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-85738\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-09-28T14:51:50.053724Z\"}}}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/security/advisories/GHSA-9hpq-mrpx-mcxg\", \"tags\": [\"exploit\"]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-28T14:51:33.529Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"TREK: SSRF Guard Bypass via IPv6 Transition Addresses (NAT64/6to4)\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-9hpq-mrpx-mcxg\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"CHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 6.3, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"liketrek\", \"product\": \"TREK\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 3.4.0\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/security/advisories/GHSA-9hpq-mrpx-mcxg\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/security/advisories/GHSA-9hpq-mrpx-mcxg\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/pull/1540\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/pull/1540\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/commit/a2bd9be184a94997105ce190dad920c41e7b10df\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/commit/a2bd9be184a94997105ce190dad920c41e7b10df\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/releases/tag/v3.4.0\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/liketrek/TREK/releases/tag/v3.4.0\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"TREK is a collaborative travel planner. Prior to 3.4.0, the checkSsrf logic in server/src/utils/ssrfGuard.ts does not recognize NAT64, 6to4, or Teredo IPv6 transition addresses that encode an IPv4 destination. An authenticated user who controls a DNS record can supply a URL whose AAAA result is a transition address embedding a private, loopback, or link-local IPv4 target, and isAlwaysBlocked and isPrivateNetwork classify the address as allowed. In a deployment that routes the applicable transition format, user-facing imports, webhooks, integrations, or plugin egress can reach internal services or cloud metadata and expose returned information. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-918\", \"description\": \"CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-24T18:09:31.268Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-85738\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-28T14:51:56.222Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-09-04T14:50:16.719Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-09-24T18:09:31.268Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…