CVE-2026-80610 (GCVE-0-2026-80610)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-08-28 06:48
Modified
2026-08-28 06:48
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: enetc: fix potential divide-by-zero when num_vsi is zero
For i.MX94 series, all the standalone ENETCs do not support SR-IOV, so
pf->caps.num_vsi is zero. This leads to a divide-by-zero in
enetc4_default_rings_allocation() when distributing rings among PF and
VFs.
Division by zero is undefined behavior in C. On ARM64, the UDIV/SDIV
instructions silently return zero rather than raising an exception, so
the issue does not cause a visible crash. However, relying on this
behavior is incorrect and poses a cross-platform compatibility risk.
Add an explicit check for num_vsi == 0 and return early after the PF's
rings have been configured.
References
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "cd37bcb67f909a8683cc8c38a63ac7367a7f6161",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2d673b0e2f8d75b66aa21e5ca5d95c415dec5be7",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "5da65537792b68b6052ffcab65e04c27aea6dfe4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2d673b0e2f8d75b66aa21e5ca5d95c415dec5be7",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.19"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.19",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.1.5",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.2",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "7.1.5",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.19",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "7.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.19",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: enetc: fix potential divide-by-zero when num_vsi is zero\n\nFor i.MX94 series, all the standalone ENETCs do not support SR-IOV, so\npf-\u003ecaps.num_vsi is zero. This leads to a divide-by-zero in\nenetc4_default_rings_allocation() when distributing rings among PF and\nVFs.\n\nDivision by zero is undefined behavior in C. On ARM64, the UDIV/SDIV\ninstructions silently return zero rather than raising an exception, so\nthe issue does not cause a visible crash. However, relying on this\nbehavior is incorrect and poses a cross-platform compatibility risk.\n\nAdd an explicit check for num_vsi == 0 and return early after the PF\u0027s\nrings have been configured."
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-28T06:48:33.340Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cd37bcb67f909a8683cc8c38a63ac7367a7f6161"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5da65537792b68b6052ffcab65e04c27aea6dfe4"
}
],
"title": "net: enetc: fix potential divide-by-zero when num_vsi is zero",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-80610",
"datePublished": "2026-08-28T06:48:33.340Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-26T14:34:25.773Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-28T06:48:33.340Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…