CVE-2026-78163 (GCVE-0-2026-78163)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-10-19 10:07
Modified
2026-10-19 18:49
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
Summary
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') and Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Camel Docling component.
This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.15.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1.
DoclingProducer decided what a String message body meant by inspecting its prefix. A body starting with http:// or https:// was handed to Docling as a remote URL to fetch, a body starting with / or containing a backslash was read from the local filesystem, and anything else was written to a temporary file and converted as document content. The mode was chosen implicitly and no endpoint option allowed a route author to pin the component to a single interpretation, so a route that means convert whatever text arrives in the body silently became a fetcher of remote resources or a reader of local files whenever the text happened to begin with one of those prefixes. The only guard applied to the derived value was a size check, and that check was wrapped in an existence test, so a path that resolved to nothing, or to a pseudo-file reporting a size of zero, passed without being checked at all. Five call sites reached the two sinks: the CLI mode appended the value as the final positional argument of the docling subprocess, and the docling-serve mode passed it either to HttpSource for the backend to fetch or to Files.readAllBytes so that the content could be base64-encoded and uploaded. Because the exchange body is never filtered by a HeaderFilterStrategy, unlike the Camel header namespace, a sender able to place text in a message that a route forwards into a docling endpoint could reach both sinks without any opt-in from the deployment.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.22.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.22.1. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x releases stream and earlier reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix, so deployments on those lines must move to a supported release. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, do not route message bodies that originate outside the deployment into a docling endpoint, and pass the document through a typed body such as File, byte[] or InputStream, or through the CamelDoclingInputFilePath header, so that the body is never subject to prefix interpretation.
References
| URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Camel |
Version: 4.15.0 Version: 4.19.0 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-78163",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-19T18:47:11.066796Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-19T18:49:01.897Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "org.apache.camel:camel-docling",
"packageURL": "pkg:maven/org.apache.camel/camel-docling",
"product": "Apache Camel",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.18.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.15.0",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.22.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.19.0",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.18.5",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.22.1",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.23.0",
"versionType": "maven"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Li Zhiyao (BUPT)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Andrea Cosentino"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027) and Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Camel Docling component.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.15.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDoclingProducer decided what a String message body meant by inspecting its prefix. A body starting with http:// or https:// was handed to Docling as a remote URL to fetch, a body starting with / or containing a backslash was read from the local filesystem, and anything else was written to a temporary file and converted as document content. The mode was chosen implicitly and no endpoint option allowed a route author to pin the component to a single interpretation, so a route that means convert whatever text arrives in the body silently became a fetcher of remote resources or a reader of local files whenever the text happened to begin with one of those prefixes. The only guard applied to the derived value was a size check, and that check was wrapped in an existence test, so a path that resolved to nothing, or to a pseudo-file reporting a size of zero, passed without being checked at all. Five call sites reached the two sinks: the CLI mode appended the value as the final positional argument of the docling subprocess, and the docling-serve mode passed it either to HttpSource for the backend to fetch or to Files.readAllBytes so that the content could be base64-encoded and uploaded. Because the exchange body is never filtered by a HeaderFilterStrategy, unlike the Camel header namespace, a sender able to place text in a message that a route forwards into a docling endpoint could reach both sinks without any opt-in from the deployment.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.22.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.22.1. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x releases stream and earlier reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix, so deployments on those lines must move to a supported release. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, do not route message bodies that originate outside the deployment into a docling endpoint, and pass the document through a typed body such as File, byte[] or InputStream, or through the CamelDoclingInputFilePath header, so that the body is never subject to prefix interpretation.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027) and Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Camel Docling component.\n\n\n\nThis issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.15.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1.\n\n\n\nDoclingProducer decided what a String message body meant by inspecting its prefix. A body starting with http:// or https:// was handed to Docling as a remote URL to fetch, a body starting with / or containing a backslash was read from the local filesystem, and anything else was written to a temporary file and converted as document content. The mode was chosen implicitly and no endpoint option allowed a route author to pin the component to a single interpretation, so a route that means convert whatever text arrives in the body silently became a fetcher of remote resources or a reader of local files whenever the text happened to begin with one of those prefixes. The only guard applied to the derived value was a size check, and that check was wrapped in an existence test, so a path that resolved to nothing, or to a pseudo-file reporting a size of zero, passed without being checked at all. Five call sites reached the two sinks: the CLI mode appended the value as the final positional argument of the docling subprocess, and the docling-serve mode passed it either to HttpSource for the backend to fetch or to Files.readAllBytes so that the content could be base64-encoded and uploaded. Because the exchange body is never filtered by a HeaderFilterStrategy, unlike the Camel header namespace, a sender able to place text in a message that a route forwards into a docling endpoint could reach both sinks without any opt-in from the deployment.\n\n\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.22.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.22.1. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x releases stream and earlier reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix, so deployments on those lines must move to a supported release. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, do not route message bodies that originate outside the deployment into a docling endpoint, and pass the document through a typed body such as File, byte[] or InputStream, or through the CamelDoclingInputFilePath header, so that the body is never subject to prefix interpretation."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-22",
"description": "CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-200",
"description": "CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-19T10:07:06.939Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-78163",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-78163.html"
},
{
"name": "CAMEL-24422",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24422"
},
{
"name": "Fix on main (4.23.0)",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25596"
},
{
"name": "Backport to camel-4.22.x (4.22.1)",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25733"
},
{
"name": "Backport to camel-4.18.x (4.18.5)",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25744"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eUpgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.22.x stream should upgrade to 4.22.1 and users on the 4.18.x stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x stream and earlier reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.22.x stream should upgrade to 4.22.1 and users on the 4.18.x stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x stream and earlier reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Apache Camel: Camel-Docling Unvalidated Message Body Input Source Enables Server-Side Request Forgery and Local File Disclosure",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eDo not route message bodies originating outside the deployment into a docling endpoint. Pass the document through a typed body such as File, byte[] or InputStream, or through the CamelDoclingInputFilePath header, so that the body is not subject to prefix interpretation.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Do not route message bodies originating outside the deployment into a docling endpoint. Pass the document through a typed body such as File, byte[] or InputStream, or through the CamelDoclingInputFilePath header, so that the body is not subject to prefix interpretation."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.3"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-78163",
"datePublished": "2026-10-19T10:07:06.939Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-23T12:48:57.941Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-19T18:49:01.897Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-78163\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-10-19T18:47:11.066796Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-19T18:47:26.946Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Apache Camel: Camel-Docling Unvalidated Message Body Input Source Enables Server-Side Request Forgery and Local File Disclosure\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Li Zhiyao (BUPT)\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation developer\", \"value\": \"Andrea Cosentino\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 5.9, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Apache Software Foundation\", \"product\": \"Apache Camel\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"4.15.0\", \"lessThan\": \"4.18.5\", \"versionType\": \"maven\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"4.19.0\", \"lessThan\": \"4.22.1\", \"versionType\": \"maven\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"4.18.5\", \"versionType\": \"maven\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"4.22.1\", \"versionType\": \"maven\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"4.23.0\", \"versionType\": \"maven\"}], \"packageURL\": \"pkg:maven/org.apache.camel/camel-docling\", \"packageName\": \"org.apache.camel:camel-docling\", \"collectionURL\": \"https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"solutions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.22.x stream should upgrade to 4.22.1 and users on the 4.18.x stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x stream and earlier reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eUpgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.22.x stream should upgrade to 4.22.1 and users on the 4.18.x stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x stream and earlier reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-78163.html\", \"name\": \"Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-78163\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24422\", \"name\": \"CAMEL-24422\", \"tags\": [\"issue-tracking\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25596\", \"name\": \"Fix on main (4.23.0)\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25733\", \"name\": \"Backport to camel-4.22.x (4.22.1)\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25744\", \"name\": \"Backport to camel-4.18.x (4.18.5)\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}], \"workarounds\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Do not route message bodies originating outside the deployment into a docling endpoint. Pass the document through a typed body such as File, byte[] or InputStream, or through the CamelDoclingInputFilePath header, so that the body is not subject to prefix interpretation.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eDo not route message bodies originating outside the deployment into a docling endpoint. Pass the document through a typed body such as File, byte[] or InputStream, or through the CamelDoclingInputFilePath header, so that the body is not subject to prefix interpretation.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 1.0.3\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027) and Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Camel Docling component.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.15.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1.\\n\\n\\n\\nDoclingProducer decided what a String message body meant by inspecting its prefix. A body starting with http:// or https:// was handed to Docling as a remote URL to fetch, a body starting with / or containing a backslash was read from the local filesystem, and anything else was written to a temporary file and converted as document content. The mode was chosen implicitly and no endpoint option allowed a route author to pin the component to a single interpretation, so a route that means convert whatever text arrives in the body silently became a fetcher of remote resources or a reader of local files whenever the text happened to begin with one of those prefixes. The only guard applied to the derived value was a size check, and that check was wrapped in an existence test, so a path that resolved to nothing, or to a pseudo-file reporting a size of zero, passed without being checked at all. Five call sites reached the two sinks: the CLI mode appended the value as the final positional argument of the docling subprocess, and the docling-serve mode passed it either to HttpSource for the backend to fetch or to Files.readAllBytes so that the content could be base64-encoded and uploaded. Because the exchange body is never filtered by a HeaderFilterStrategy, unlike the Camel header namespace, a sender able to place text in a message that a route forwards into a docling endpoint could reach both sinks without any opt-in from the deployment.\\n\\n\\n\\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.22.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.22.1. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x releases stream and earlier reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix, so deployments on those lines must move to a supported release. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, do not route message bodies that originate outside the deployment into a docling endpoint, and pass the document through a typed body such as File, byte[] or InputStream, or through the CamelDoclingInputFilePath header, so that the body is never subject to prefix interpretation.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027) and Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Camel Docling component.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.15.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDoclingProducer decided what a String message body meant by inspecting its prefix. A body starting with http:// or https:// was handed to Docling as a remote URL to fetch, a body starting with / or containing a backslash was read from the local filesystem, and anything else was written to a temporary file and converted as document content. The mode was chosen implicitly and no endpoint option allowed a route author to pin the component to a single interpretation, so a route that means convert whatever text arrives in the body silently became a fetcher of remote resources or a reader of local files whenever the text happened to begin with one of those prefixes. The only guard applied to the derived value was a size check, and that check was wrapped in an existence test, so a path that resolved to nothing, or to a pseudo-file reporting a size of zero, passed without being checked at all. Five call sites reached the two sinks: the CLI mode appended the value as the final positional argument of the docling subprocess, and the docling-serve mode passed it either to HttpSource for the backend to fetch or to Files.readAllBytes so that the content could be base64-encoded and uploaded. Because the exchange body is never filtered by a HeaderFilterStrategy, unlike the Camel header namespace, a sender able to place text in a message that a route forwards into a docling endpoint could reach both sinks without any opt-in from the deployment.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.22.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.22.1. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x releases stream and earlier reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix, so deployments on those lines must move to a supported release. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, do not route message bodies that originate outside the deployment into a docling endpoint, and pass the document through a typed body such as File, byte[] or InputStream, or through the CamelDoclingInputFilePath header, so that the body is never subject to prefix interpretation.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-918\", \"description\": \"CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-22\", \"description\": \"CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-200\", \"description\": \"CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09\", \"shortName\": \"apache\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-19T10:07:06.939Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-78163\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-19T18:49:01.897Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-08-23T12:48:57.941Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-10-19T10:07:06.939Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"apache\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…