CVE-2026-76347 (GCVE-0-2026-76347)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-08-19 21:34
Modified
2026-08-20 16:27
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-918 - The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
Summary
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, and Splunk Secure Gateway versions below 3.10.9, 3.9.23, and 3.8.70, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could use Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in report notifications to send system-authenticated requests to internal Splunk services, which could allow for changes to Search Head Cluster state and a denial of service. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk Secure Gateway does not validate report notification path values before it sends internal requests.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splunk | Splunk Enterprise |
Version: 10.4 < 10.4.2 Version: 10.2 < 10.2.6 Version: 10.0 < 10.0.9 Version: 9.4 < 9.4.14 |
|||||||
|
|||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-76347",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-20T16:15:53.439838Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-20T16:27:36.214Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"modules": [
"Splunk Secure Gateway"
],
"product": "Splunk Enterprise",
"vendor": "Splunk",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.4.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.4",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "10.2.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.2",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "10.0.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "9.4.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.4",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "Splunk Secure Gateway",
"vendor": "Splunk",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.10.9",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.10",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.9.23",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.9",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.8.70",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.8",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, and Splunk Secure Gateway versions below 3.10.9, 3.9.23, and 3.8.70, a user who does not hold the \"admin\" or \"power\" Splunk roles could use Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in report notifications to send system-authenticated requests to internal Splunk services, which could allow for changes to Search Head Cluster state and a denial of service. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk Secure Gateway does not validate report notification path values before it sends internal requests."
}
],
"value": "In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, and Splunk Secure Gateway versions below 3.10.9, 3.9.23, and 3.8.70, a user who does not hold the \"admin\" or \"power\" Splunk roles could use Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in report notifications to send system-authenticated requests to internal Splunk services, which could allow for changes to Search Head Cluster state and a denial of service. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk Secure Gateway does not validate report notification path values before it sends internal requests."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.",
"lang": "en",
"type": "cwe"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-19T21:34:43.078Z",
"orgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"shortName": "cisco"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0801"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade Splunk Enterprise to versions 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, or higher."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "SVD-2026-0801"
},
"title": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) through the Report Notifications REST API in Splunk Secure Gateway",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade Splunk Secure Gateway to versions 3.10.9, 3.9.23, and 3.8.70, or higher. If you cannot upgrade Splunk Enterprise or Splunk Secure Gateway, turn off or remove the Splunk Secure Gateway app. See [Manage app and add-on objects](https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/admin-manual/10.2/meet-splunk-apps/manage-app-and-add-on-objects) in the Splunk documentation. Note: Splunk Mobile, Spacebridge, and Mission Control rely on functionality in the Splunk Secure Gateway app. If you do not use any of these apps, features, or functionality, as a potential mitigation, you may turn off or remove the app."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"assignerShortName": "cisco",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-76347",
"datePublished": "2026-08-19T21:34:43.078Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-19T12:02:03.628Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-20T16:27:36.214Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…