CVE-2026-69137 (GCVE-0-2026-69137)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-11-05 18:21
Modified
2026-11-05 18:21
CWE
  • CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Summary
SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to 7.15.2 and 8.10.2, the CalendarAccount testConnection action passes an authenticated caller's server_url directly to curl without host, address, or scheme validation. The affected flow begins at CalendarAccount::action_testConnection and uses server_url, CalDAVProvider::makeCalDAVRequest(), and PROPFIND to carry attacker-controlled data or authorization state into the security-sensitive operation. The server sends a PROPFIND request from its network context and returns non-success response bodies, enabling internal-service access, partial response disclosure, service enumeration, and possible cloud metadata access. This issue is fixed in versions 7.15.2 and 8.10.2.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
SuiteCRM SuiteCRM Version: < 7.15.2
Version: >= 8.0.0, < 8.10.2
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "SuiteCRM",
          "vendor": "SuiteCRM",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 7.15.2"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 8.0.0, \u003c 8.10.2"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to 7.15.2 and 8.10.2, the CalendarAccount testConnection action passes an authenticated caller\u0027s server_url directly to curl without host, address, or scheme validation. The affected flow begins at CalendarAccount::action_testConnection and uses server_url, CalDAVProvider::makeCalDAVRequest(), and PROPFIND to carry attacker-controlled data or authorization state into the security-sensitive operation. The server sends a PROPFIND request from its network context and returns non-success response bodies, enabling internal-service access, partial response disclosure, service enumeration, and possible cloud metadata access. This issue is fixed in versions 7.15.2 and 8.10.2."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.7,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "CHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-918",
              "description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T18:21:17.980Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM/security/advisories/GHSA-72r3-24x4-j46c",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM/security/advisories/GHSA-72r3-24x4-j46c"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM-Core/commit/a11f50180d939f639cc468b5d536e8ad714dfb68",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM-Core/commit/a11f50180d939f639cc468b5d536e8ad714dfb68"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM/commit/d6bca97a0159ec019a969b86eca32affab3beb7c",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM/commit/d6bca97a0159ec019a969b86eca32affab3beb7c"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM-Core/releases/tag/v8.10.2",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM-Core/releases/tag/v8.10.2"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM/releases/tag/v7.15.2",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM/releases/tag/v7.15.2"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-72r3-24x4-j46c",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "SuiteCRM: Authenticated SSRF in CalendarAccount testConnection Allows Internal Network Access and Response Disclosure"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-69137",
    "datePublished": "2026-11-05T18:21:17.980Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-08-03T15:20:30.218Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T18:21:17.980Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…