CVE-2026-67408 (GCVE-0-2026-67408)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-09-25 16:35
Modified
2026-09-25 19:09
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-400 - Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Summary
RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. From 4.1.0 until 4.3.3, 4.2.9, and 4.1.11, Stream Management Super-Stream Binding Keys Allocation Allows Low-Privilege Node Denial of Service. rabbitMQ 4.3.1 with rabbitmqstreammanagement enabled accepts PUT /api/stream/super-streams/{vhost}/{name} requests from an authenticated management user that can access the target vhost. When the request body contains the binding-keys field, the handler parses the attacker-controlled comma-separated string and builds the full stream-name list before checking whether the user has permission to configure the resulting streams. A low-privileged management user with vhost access but no configure, write, or read permission can therefore force large transient allocations before the resource permission check. In a 768 MB memory-limited container, one HTTP PUT with about 4.5 MB of JSON body killed the RabbitMQ container with Docker state exited true An authenticated low-privileged management user can kill a memory-limited RabbitMQ node with one HTTP This issue is fixed in versions 4.3.3, 4.2.9, and 4.1.11.
References
| URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq | rabbitmq-server |
Version: >= 4.3.0, < 4.3.3 Version: >= 4.2.0, < 4.2.9 Version: >= 4.1.0, < 4.1.11 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-67408",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-25T19:09:46.402384Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T19:09:53.750Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-2hm4-4438-49q8"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "rabbitmq-server",
"vendor": "rabbitmq",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.3.0, \u003c 4.3.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.2.0, \u003c 4.2.9"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.1.0, \u003c 4.1.11"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. From 4.1.0 until 4.3.3, 4.2.9, and 4.1.11, Stream Management Super-Stream Binding Keys Allocation Allows Low-Privilege Node Denial of Service. rabbitMQ 4.3.1 with rabbitmqstreammanagement enabled accepts PUT /api/stream/super-streams/{vhost}/{name} requests from an authenticated management user that can access the target vhost. When the request body contains the binding-keys field, the handler parses the attacker-controlled comma-separated string and builds the full stream-name list before checking whether the user has permission to configure the resulting streams. A low-privileged management user with vhost access but no configure, write, or read permission can therefore force large transient allocations before the resource permission check. In a 768 MB memory-limited container, one HTTP PUT with about 4.5 MB of JSON body killed the RabbitMQ container with Docker state exited true An authenticated low-privileged management user can kill a memory-limited RabbitMQ node with one HTTP This issue is fixed in versions 4.3.3, 4.2.9, and 4.1.11."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T16:35:22.829Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-2hm4-4438-49q8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-2hm4-4438-49q8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/0f3defd176e027f54f447beee168d906d4f109b6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/0f3defd176e027f54f447beee168d906d4f109b6"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/eb11bc44005fd6d327a78bf171bc598207778c9b",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/eb11bc44005fd6d327a78bf171bc598207778c9b"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.9"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.3"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-2hm4-4438-49q8",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "RabbitMQ: Stream Management Super-Stream Binding Keys Allocation Allows Low-Privilege Node Denial of Service"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-67408",
"datePublished": "2026-09-25T16:35:22.829Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-29T15:02:20.411Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-25T19:09:53.750Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…