CVE-2026-66074 (GCVE-0-2026-66074)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-09-23 20:45
Modified
2026-09-24 13:50
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-1333 - Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
Summary
RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0, match_value/3 passes the user-supplied ?name= regular expression to re:run with no match_limit option, and executes it once per resource in the result set. OTP's default 10M match_limit caps each call at roughly 100-200ms, but the regex runs once per resource in the result set. With a large set, for example 5000 queues at 150ms each, a single request consumes 12 or more minutes of CPU. Parallel requests saturate the schedulers. The use_regex=true option is a supported feature on list endpoints, so this path is reachable through normal API use. Preconditions include Any user with the management tag can exploit this.. This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0.
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rabbitmq | rabbitmq-server |
Version: >= 3.13.0, < 3.13.15 Version: >= 4.0.0, < 4.0.20 Version: >= 4.1.0, < 4.1.11 Version: >= 4.2.0, < 4.2.6 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-66074",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-24T13:50:12.470782Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T13:50:30.528Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "rabbitmq-server",
"vendor": "rabbitmq",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 3.13.0, \u003c 3.13.15"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.0.0, \u003c 4.0.20"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.1.0, \u003c 4.1.11"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.2.0, \u003c 4.2.6"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0, match_value/3 passes the user-supplied ?name= regular expression to re:run with no match_limit option, and executes it once per resource in the result set. OTP\u0027s default 10M match_limit caps each call at roughly 100-200ms, but the regex runs once per resource in the result set. With a large set, for example 5000 queues at 150ms each, a single request consumes 12 or more minutes of CPU. Parallel requests saturate the schedulers. The use_regex=true option is a supported feature on list endpoints, so this path is reachable through normal API use. Preconditions include Any user with the management tag can exploit this.. This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1333",
"description": "CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-23T20:45:28.000Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-rg5q-vcgf-rfh7",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-rg5q-vcgf-rfh7"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.6"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-rg5q-vcgf-rfh7",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "RabbitMQ: ReDoS via management API ?name= filter"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-66074",
"datePublished": "2026-09-23T20:45:28.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-23T23:25:28.897Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T13:50:30.528Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"cna\": {\"title\": \"RabbitMQ: ReDoS via management API ?name= filter\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-rg5q-vcgf-rfh7\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 6, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"PRESENT\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"rabbitmq\", \"product\": \"rabbitmq-server\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 3.13.0, \u003c 3.13.15\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 4.0.0, \u003c 4.0.20\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 4.1.0, \u003c 4.1.11\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 4.2.0, \u003c 4.2.6\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-rg5q-vcgf-rfh7\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-rg5q-vcgf-rfh7\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.6\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.6\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.0\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.0\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0, match_value/3 passes the user-supplied ?name= regular expression to re:run with no match_limit option, and executes it once per resource in the result set. OTP\u0027s default 10M match_limit caps each call at roughly 100-200ms, but the regex runs once per resource in the result set. With a large set, for example 5000 queues at 150ms each, a single request consumes 12 or more minutes of CPU. Parallel requests saturate the schedulers. The use_regex=true option is a supported feature on list endpoints, so this path is reachable through normal API use. Preconditions include Any user with the management tag can exploit this.. This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-1333\", \"description\": \"CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-23T20:45:28.000Z\"}}, \"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-66074\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-09-24T13:50:12.470782Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-24T13:50:26.624Z\"}}]}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-66074\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-23T20:45:28.000Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-07-23T23:25:28.897Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-09-23T20:45:28.000Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…