CVE-2026-63182 (GCVE-0-2026-63182)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-10-30 21:46
Modified
2026-10-30 21:46
CWE
  • CWE-347 - Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Summary
LightSAML implements SAML 2.0 data model classes, XML serialization and deserialization, XML security, certificate support, and message bindings. Prior to 4.7.1 and 5.0.1, LightSAML and xmlseclibs disagree about which assertion an inbound SAML signature covers. `Response::deserialize` uses `manyElementsFromXml` to collect only direct-child `saml:Assertion` elements of `samlp:Response`, and `AssertionSignatureValidatorAction` validates their `ds:Signature` using an out-of-band trusted IdP credential resolved by Issuer, not a key from the document. `XMLSecurityDSig::validateReference()` removes the enveloped signature from the shared DOM, but `processRefNode()` resolves `Reference URI="#id"` document-wide through an XPath of the form `//*[@Id]` and takes `item(0)`, which need not be the assertion whose claims LightSAML consumes. An attacker who has captured one genuinely signed assertion, such as an earlier login response, can place its signature-stripped bytes earlier in `samlp:Extensions` and present a forged direct-child assertion with the same ID and copied genuine signature. Validation then covers the hidden genuine bytes while LightSAML surfaces unsigned attacker-controlled `Subject/NameID`, `Conditions`, and `Attributes`, enabling authentication bypass or privilege escalation even when signature validation is required. The behavior was confirmed in versions 5.0.0 and 4.6.1. This issue is fixed in versions 4.7.1 and 5.0.1.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
litesaml lightsaml Version: < 4.7.1
Version: >= 5.0.0, < 5.0.1
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "lightsaml",
          "vendor": "litesaml",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 4.7.1"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 5.0.0, \u003c 5.0.1"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "LightSAML implements SAML 2.0 data model classes, XML serialization and deserialization, XML security, certificate support, and message bindings. Prior to 4.7.1 and 5.0.1, LightSAML and xmlseclibs disagree about which assertion an inbound SAML signature covers. `Response::deserialize` uses `manyElementsFromXml` to collect only direct-child `saml:Assertion` elements of `samlp:Response`, and `AssertionSignatureValidatorAction` validates their `ds:Signature` using an out-of-band trusted IdP credential resolved by Issuer, not a key from the document. `XMLSecurityDSig::validateReference()` removes the enveloped signature from the shared DOM, but `processRefNode()` resolves `Reference URI=\"#id\"` document-wide through an XPath of the form `//*[@Id]` and takes `item(0)`, which need not be the assertion whose claims LightSAML consumes. An attacker who has captured one genuinely signed assertion, such as an earlier login response, can place its signature-stripped bytes earlier in `samlp:Extensions` and present a forged direct-child assertion with the same ID and copied genuine signature. Validation then covers the hidden genuine bytes while LightSAML surfaces unsigned attacker-controlled `Subject/NameID`, `Conditions`, and `Attributes`, enabling authentication bypass or privilege escalation even when signature validation is required. The behavior was confirmed in versions 5.0.0 and 4.6.1. This issue is fixed in versions 4.7.1 and 5.0.1."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 8.1,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-347",
              "description": "CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-10-30T21:46:38.551Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/litesaml/lightsaml/security/advisories/GHSA-w553-pwx6-3mg9",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/litesaml/lightsaml/security/advisories/GHSA-w553-pwx6-3mg9"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/litesaml/lightsaml/pull/113",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/litesaml/lightsaml/pull/113"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/litesaml/lightsaml/pull/122",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/litesaml/lightsaml/pull/122"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/litesaml/lightsaml/commit/230e62d1325f2cbcaac814b78409775f7a8806a2",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/litesaml/lightsaml/commit/230e62d1325f2cbcaac814b78409775f7a8806a2"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/litesaml/lightsaml/commit/3af82bf2f3865e6aafeeb1a97c97b383b8bb7b00",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/litesaml/lightsaml/commit/3af82bf2f3865e6aafeeb1a97c97b383b8bb7b00"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/litesaml/lightsaml/releases/tag/4.7.1",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/litesaml/lightsaml/releases/tag/4.7.1"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/litesaml/lightsaml/releases/tag/5.0.1",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/litesaml/lightsaml/releases/tag/5.0.1"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-w553-pwx6-3mg9",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "LightSAML: Signature reference wrapping permits unsigned assertion claims"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-63182",
    "datePublished": "2026-10-30T21:46:38.551Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-07-15T22:13:00.721Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-10-30T21:46:38.551Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…