CVE-2026-62433 (GCVE-0-2026-62433)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-07-28 12:32
Modified
2026-07-28 16:33
Severity ?
7.3 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Summary
Parts of the DM_OP handling code assumes the caller has provided the required number of buffers for the given operation without any checking being done. As a result, certain operations might access stack rubble as structures are possibly uninitialized.
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Xen Xen Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-07-28T16:33:33.573Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "url": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-506.html"
          },
          {
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/07/28/22"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      },
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
              "baseScore": 7.3,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
              "integrityImpact": "LOW",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-62433",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-28T15:03:57.527525Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-665",
                "description": "CWE-665 Improper Initialization",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-07-28T15:06:29.391Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "Xen",
          "vendor": "Xen",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unknown",
              "version": "consult Xen advisory XSA-506"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "configurations": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "All Xen versions from 4.10 onwards are vulnerable.  Xen versions 4.9 and\nearlier are not vulnerable.\n\nOnly entities controlling HVM guests can leverage the vulnerability.\nThese are device models running in either a stub domain or de-privileged\nin Dom0."
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-07-28T12:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Parts of the DM_OP handling code assumes the caller has provided the\nrequired number of buffers for the given operation without any checking\nbeing done.  As a result, certain operations might access stack\nrubble as structures are possibly uninitialized."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "A device model of a HVM guest can gain insight on the contents of the\nXen stack, thus possibly leaking data from other guests contexts."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-28T12:32:59.802Z",
        "orgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
        "shortName": "XEN"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-506.html"
        }
      ],
      "title": "correct buffer checks for DM_OP hypercalls",
      "workarounds": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Running only PV or PVH guests will avoid the vulnerability.\n\n(Switching from a device model stub domain or a de-privileged device\nmodel to a fully privileged Dom0 device model does NOT mitigate this\nvulnerability.  Rather, it simply recategorises the vulnerability to\nhostile management code, regarding it \"as designed\"; thus it merely\nreclassifies these issues as \"not a bug\".  The security of a Xen system\nusing stub domains is still better than with a qemu-dm running as a Dom0\nprocess.  Users and vendors of stub qemu dm systems should not change\ntheir configuration to use a Dom0 QEMU process.)"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
    "assignerShortName": "XEN",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-62433",
    "datePublished": "2026-07-28T12:32:59.802Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-07-14T10:28:12.655Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-07-28T16:33:33.573Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-506.html\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/07/28/22\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-28T16:33:33.573Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.3, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-62433\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-07-28T15:03:57.527525Z\"}}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-665\", \"description\": \"CWE-665 Improper Initialization\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-28T15:03:18.873Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"correct buffer checks for DM_OP hypercalls\", \"impacts\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"A device model of a HVM guest can gain insight on the contents of the\\nXen stack, thus possibly leaking data from other guests contexts.\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Xen\", \"product\": \"Xen\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"unknown\", \"version\": \"consult Xen advisory XSA-506\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2026-07-28T12:00:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-506.html\"}], \"workarounds\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Running only PV or PVH guests will avoid the vulnerability.\\n\\n(Switching from a device model stub domain or a de-privileged device\\nmodel to a fully privileged Dom0 device model does NOT mitigate this\\nvulnerability.  Rather, it simply recategorises the vulnerability to\\nhostile management code, regarding it \\\"as designed\\\"; thus it merely\\nreclassifies these issues as \\\"not a bug\\\".  The security of a Xen system\\nusing stub domains is still better than with a qemu-dm running as a Dom0\\nprocess.  Users and vendors of stub qemu dm systems should not change\\ntheir configuration to use a Dom0 QEMU process.)\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Parts of the DM_OP handling code assumes the caller has provided the\\nrequired number of buffers for the given operation without any checking\\nbeing done.  As a result, certain operations might access stack\\nrubble as structures are possibly uninitialized.\"}], \"configurations\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"All Xen versions from 4.10 onwards are vulnerable.  Xen versions 4.9 and\\nearlier are not vulnerable.\\n\\nOnly entities controlling HVM guests can leverage the vulnerability.\\nThese are device models running in either a stub domain or de-privileged\\nin Dom0.\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f\", \"shortName\": \"XEN\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-28T12:32:59.802Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-62433\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-28T16:33:33.573Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-07-14T10:28:12.655Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-07-28T12:32:59.802Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"XEN\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.