CVE-2026-59251 (GCVE-0-2026-59251)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-07-27 15:30
Modified
2026-07-28 09:54
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Summary
Allocation of resources without limits in Erlang/OTP public_key certificate path validation allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause denial of service by sending a crafted X.509 certificate chain during the TLS handshake.
During RFC 5280 policy processing in public_key:pkix_path_validation/3, the certificate policy tree maintained by pubkey_policy_tree grows without an upper bound. When a certificate chain contains M policies per certificate and K certificates, the tree grows on the order of M^K nodes because pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaves/2 and pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaf_siblings/2 extend the tree per policy per certificate. A modest chain with many policies per certificate is enough to pin BEAM schedulers and exhaust the node's memory, taking down the entire VM. The attacker only needs to be able to present a certificate chain to the victim, which is the normal precondition for a TLS handshake, so exploitation succeeds against any incoming or outgoing TLS connection that validates the peer's chain (the default for SSL/TLS clients and mutual-TLS servers).
This is the same vulnerability class as OpenSSL's X509_verify_cert policy tree DoS.
This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/public_key/src/pubkey_policy_tree.erl and program routines pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaves/2 and pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaf_siblings/2.
This issue affects OTP from OTP 26.2 before OTP 29.0.4, OTP 28.5.0.4 and OTP 27.3.4.15, corresponding to public_key from 1.15 before 1.21.4, 1.20.3.4 and 1.17.1.5.
References
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-59251",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-27T18:31:50.981990Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-27T18:32:09.923Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"pubkey_policy_tree"
],
"packageName": "public_key",
"packageURL": "pkg:otp/public_key?repository_url=https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ferlang%2Fotp\u0026vcs_url=git%20https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ferlang%2Fotp.git",
"product": "OTP",
"programFiles": [
"src/pubkey_policy_tree.erl"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaves/2"
},
{
"name": "pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaf_siblings/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/erlang/otp",
"vendor": "Erlang",
"versions": [
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "1.21.4",
"status": "unaffected"
},
{
"at": "1.20.3.4",
"status": "unaffected"
},
{
"at": "1.17.1.5",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.15",
"versionType": "otp"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"pubkey_policy_tree"
],
"packageName": "erlang/otp",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/erlang/otp",
"product": "OTP",
"programFiles": [
"lib/public_key/src/pubkey_policy_tree.erl"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaves/2"
},
{
"name": "pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaf_siblings/2"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/erlang/otp",
"vendor": "Erlang",
"versions": [
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "29.0.4",
"status": "unaffected"
},
{
"at": "28.5.0.4",
"status": "unaffected"
},
{
"at": "27.3.4.15",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "26.2",
"versionType": "otp"
},
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "f8580fc117098c08165f46c26fd0750c5cfb2a90",
"status": "unaffected"
},
{
"at": "f04c6bba38de1cf1b1836a7d9a9fbe239bd939e8",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9d1dda7bad5a64b58c10a1554751689e94131a73",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "27.3.4.15",
"versionStartIncluding": "26.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "28.5.0.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "28.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "29.0.4",
"versionStartIncluding": "29.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Lukas Backstr\u00f6m"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Jakub Witczak"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "Micha\u0142 W\u0105sowski"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAllocation of resources without limits in Erlang/OTP public_key certificate path validation allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause denial of service by sending a crafted X.509 certificate chain during the TLS handshake.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDuring RFC 5280 policy processing in \u003ctt\u003epublic_key:pkix_path_validation/3\u003c/tt\u003e, the certificate policy tree maintained by \u003ctt\u003epubkey_policy_tree\u003c/tt\u003e grows without an upper bound. When a certificate chain contains M policies per certificate and K certificates, the tree grows on the order of M^K nodes because \u003ctt\u003epubkey_policy_tree:add_leaves/2\u003c/tt\u003e and \u003ctt\u003epubkey_policy_tree:add_leaf_siblings/2\u003c/tt\u003e extend the tree per policy per certificate. A modest chain with many policies per certificate is enough to pin BEAM schedulers and exhaust the node\u0027s memory, taking down the entire VM. The attacker only needs to be able to present a certificate chain to the victim, which is the normal precondition for a TLS handshake, so exploitation succeeds against any incoming or outgoing TLS connection that validates the peer\u0027s chain (the default for SSL/TLS clients and mutual-TLS servers).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis is the same vulnerability class as OpenSSL\u0027s \u003ctt\u003eX509_verify_cert\u003c/tt\u003e policy tree DoS.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis vulnerability is associated with program files \u003ctt\u003elib/public_key/src/pubkey_policy_tree.erl\u003c/tt\u003e and program routines \u003ctt\u003epubkey_policy_tree:add_leaves/2\u003c/tt\u003e and \u003ctt\u003epubkey_policy_tree:add_leaf_siblings/2\u003c/tt\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects OTP from OTP 26.2 before OTP\u0026nbsp;29.0.4, OTP\u0026nbsp;28.5.0.4 and OTP\u0026nbsp;27.3.4.15, corresponding to public_key from 1.15 before 1.21.4, 1.20.3.4 and 1.17.1.5.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Allocation of resources without limits in Erlang/OTP public_key certificate path validation allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause denial of service by sending a crafted X.509 certificate chain during the TLS handshake.\n\nDuring RFC 5280 policy processing in public_key:pkix_path_validation/3, the certificate policy tree maintained by pubkey_policy_tree grows without an upper bound. When a certificate chain contains M policies per certificate and K certificates, the tree grows on the order of M^K nodes because pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaves/2 and pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaf_siblings/2 extend the tree per policy per certificate. A modest chain with many policies per certificate is enough to pin BEAM schedulers and exhaust the node\u0027s memory, taking down the entire VM. The attacker only needs to be able to present a certificate chain to the victim, which is the normal precondition for a TLS handshake, so exploitation succeeds against any incoming or outgoing TLS connection that validates the peer\u0027s chain (the default for SSL/TLS clients and mutual-TLS servers).\n\nThis is the same vulnerability class as OpenSSL\u0027s X509_verify_cert policy tree DoS.\n\nThis vulnerability is associated with program files lib/public_key/src/pubkey_policy_tree.erl and program routines pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaves/2 and pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaf_siblings/2.\n\nThis issue affects OTP from OTP 26.2 before OTP\u00a029.0.4, OTP\u00a028.5.0.4 and OTP\u00a027.3.4.15, corresponding to public_key from 1.15 before 1.21.4, 1.20.3.4 and 1.17.1.5."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-130",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-130 Excessive Allocation"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-28T09:54:59.169Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-622p-qfh6-c352"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-59251.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-59251"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_version-scheme"
],
"url": "https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versions"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/f8580fc117098c08165f46c26fd0750c5cfb2a90"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/f04c6bba38de1cf1b1836a7d9a9fbe239bd939e8"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Denial of service via exponential certificate policy tree growth in path validation",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-59251",
"datePublished": "2026-07-27T15:30:47.097Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-04T04:24:03.653Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-28T09:54:59.169Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-59251\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-07-27T18:31:50.981990Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-27T18:32:04.356Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Denial of service via exponential certificate policy tree growth in path validation\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"INTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Lukas Backstr\\u00f6m\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation developer\", \"value\": \"Jakub Witczak\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation reviewer\", \"value\": \"Micha\\u0142 W\\u0105sowski\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-130\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-130 Excessive Allocation\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 8.7, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"cpes\": [\"cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\\\\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"], \"repo\": \"https://github.com/erlang/otp\", \"vendor\": \"Erlang\", \"modules\": [\"pubkey_policy_tree\"], \"product\": \"OTP\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"changes\": [{\"at\": \"1.21.4\", \"status\": \"unaffected\"}, {\"at\": \"1.20.3.4\", \"status\": \"unaffected\"}, {\"at\": \"1.17.1.5\", \"status\": \"unaffected\"}], \"version\": \"1.15\", \"lessThan\": \"*\", \"versionType\": \"otp\"}], \"packageURL\": \"pkg:otp/public_key?repository_url=https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ferlang%2Fotp\u0026vcs_url=git%20https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ferlang%2Fotp.git\", \"packageName\": \"public_key\", \"programFiles\": [\"src/pubkey_policy_tree.erl\"], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\", \"programRoutines\": [{\"name\": \"pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaves/2\"}, {\"name\": \"pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaf_siblings/2\"}]}, {\"cpes\": [\"cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\\\\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"], \"repo\": \"https://github.com/erlang/otp\", \"vendor\": \"Erlang\", \"modules\": [\"pubkey_policy_tree\"], \"product\": \"OTP\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"changes\": [{\"at\": \"29.0.4\", \"status\": \"unaffected\"}, {\"at\": \"28.5.0.4\", \"status\": \"unaffected\"}, {\"at\": \"27.3.4.15\", \"status\": \"unaffected\"}], \"version\": \"26.2\", \"lessThan\": \"*\", \"versionType\": \"otp\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"changes\": [{\"at\": \"f8580fc117098c08165f46c26fd0750c5cfb2a90\", \"status\": \"unaffected\"}, {\"at\": \"f04c6bba38de1cf1b1836a7d9a9fbe239bd939e8\", \"status\": \"unaffected\"}], \"version\": \"9d1dda7bad5a64b58c10a1554751689e94131a73\", \"lessThan\": \"*\", \"versionType\": \"git\"}], \"packageURL\": \"pkg:github/erlang/otp\", \"packageName\": \"erlang/otp\", \"programFiles\": [\"lib/public_key/src/pubkey_policy_tree.erl\"], \"collectionURL\": \"https://github.com\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\", \"programRoutines\": [{\"name\": \"pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaves/2\"}, {\"name\": \"pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaf_siblings/2\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-622p-qfh6-c352\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\", \"related\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-59251.html\", \"tags\": [\"related\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-59251\", \"tags\": [\"related\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versions\", \"tags\": [\"x_version-scheme\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/f8580fc117098c08165f46c26fd0750c5cfb2a90\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/f04c6bba38de1cf1b1836a7d9a9fbe239bd939e8\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"cvelib 1.8.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Allocation of resources without limits in Erlang/OTP public_key certificate path validation allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause denial of service by sending a crafted X.509 certificate chain during the TLS handshake.\\n\\nDuring RFC 5280 policy processing in public_key:pkix_path_validation/3, the certificate policy tree maintained by pubkey_policy_tree grows without an upper bound. When a certificate chain contains M policies per certificate and K certificates, the tree grows on the order of M^K nodes because pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaves/2 and pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaf_siblings/2 extend the tree per policy per certificate. A modest chain with many policies per certificate is enough to pin BEAM schedulers and exhaust the node\u0027s memory, taking down the entire VM. The attacker only needs to be able to present a certificate chain to the victim, which is the normal precondition for a TLS handshake, so exploitation succeeds against any incoming or outgoing TLS connection that validates the peer\u0027s chain (the default for SSL/TLS clients and mutual-TLS servers).\\n\\nThis is the same vulnerability class as OpenSSL\u0027s X509_verify_cert policy tree DoS.\\n\\nThis vulnerability is associated with program files lib/public_key/src/pubkey_policy_tree.erl and program routines pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaves/2 and pubkey_policy_tree:add_leaf_siblings/2.\\n\\nThis issue affects OTP from OTP 26.2 before OTP\\u00a029.0.4, OTP\\u00a028.5.0.4 and OTP\\u00a027.3.4.15, corresponding to public_key from 1.15 before 1.21.4, 1.20.3.4 and 1.17.1.5.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eAllocation of resources without limits in Erlang/OTP public_key certificate path validation allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause denial of service by sending a crafted X.509 certificate chain during the TLS handshake.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDuring RFC 5280 policy processing in \u003ctt\u003epublic_key:pkix_path_validation/3\u003c/tt\u003e, the certificate policy tree maintained by \u003ctt\u003epubkey_policy_tree\u003c/tt\u003e grows without an upper bound. When a certificate chain contains M policies per certificate and K certificates, the tree grows on the order of M^K nodes because \u003ctt\u003epubkey_policy_tree:add_leaves/2\u003c/tt\u003e and \u003ctt\u003epubkey_policy_tree:add_leaf_siblings/2\u003c/tt\u003e extend the tree per policy per certificate. A modest chain with many policies per certificate is enough to pin BEAM schedulers and exhaust the node\u0027s memory, taking down the entire VM. The attacker only needs to be able to present a certificate chain to the victim, which is the normal precondition for a TLS handshake, so exploitation succeeds against any incoming or outgoing TLS connection that validates the peer\u0027s chain (the default for SSL/TLS clients and mutual-TLS servers).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis is the same vulnerability class as OpenSSL\u0027s \u003ctt\u003eX509_verify_cert\u003c/tt\u003e policy tree DoS.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis vulnerability is associated with program files \u003ctt\u003elib/public_key/src/pubkey_policy_tree.erl\u003c/tt\u003e and program routines \u003ctt\u003epubkey_policy_tree:add_leaves/2\u003c/tt\u003e and \u003ctt\u003epubkey_policy_tree:add_leaf_siblings/2\u003c/tt\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects OTP from OTP 26.2 before OTP\u0026nbsp;29.0.4, OTP\u0026nbsp;28.5.0.4 and OTP\u0026nbsp;27.3.4.15, corresponding to public_key from 1.15 before 1.21.4, 1.20.3.4 and 1.17.1.5.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-770\", \"description\": \"CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling\"}]}], \"cpeApplicability\": [{\"nodes\": [{\"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\\\\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"27.3.4.15\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"26.2\"}, {\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\\\\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"28.5.0.4\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"28.0\"}, {\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang\\\\/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"29.0.4\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"29.0\"}], \"operator\": \"OR\"}], \"operator\": \"AND\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\", \"shortName\": \"EEF\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-28T09:54:59.169Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-59251\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-28T09:54:59.169Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-07-04T04:24:03.653Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-07-27T15:30:47.097Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"EEF\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…