CVE-2026-56416 (GCVE-0-2026-56416)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-07-22 13:10
Modified
2026-07-22 14:00
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Summary
In NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.1, when the validator builds the canonical RDATA form for an RRSIG-covered PX/RP/MINFO/SOA RRset, it computes the address of the second embedded domain name as 'datstart + dname_valid(datstart, ...)' and passes it straight to 'query_dname_tolower()' without checking that a second name is actually present in the RDATA. The wire-format parser accepts multi-dname RRs whose RDATA ends after the first name, so an attacker who runs a DNSSEC-signed authoritative server can deliver a record with an absent second domain name (e.g. SOA record) and cause 'query_dname_tolower()' to walk label-by-label through stale bytes in the per-worker 'env->scratch_buffer', past the end of that heap allocation if 'msg-buffer-size' has been lowered from the default. This leads to heap buffer overflow and on a release build the outcome relies heavily on the contents of the buffer tail and the adjacent heap chunk.
References
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLnet Labs | Unbound |
Version: 0 ≤ |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-56416",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-22T13:59:48.705600Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T14:00:45.744Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Unbound",
"vendor": "NLnet Labs",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.25.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Qifan Zhang (Palo Alto Networks)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.1, when the validator builds the canonical RDATA form for an RRSIG-covered PX/RP/MINFO/SOA RRset, it computes the address of the second embedded domain name as \u0027datstart + dname_valid(datstart, ...)\u0027 and passes it straight to \u0027query_dname_tolower()\u0027 without checking that a second name is actually present in the RDATA. The wire-format parser accepts multi-dname RRs whose RDATA ends after the first name, so an attacker who runs a DNSSEC-signed authoritative server can deliver a record with an absent second domain name (e.g. SOA record) and cause \u0027query_dname_tolower()\u0027 to walk label-by-label through stale bytes in the per-worker \u0027env-\u003escratch_buffer\u0027, past the end of that heap allocation if \u0027msg-buffer-size\u0027 has been lowered from the default. This leads to heap buffer overflow and on a release build the outcome relies heavily on the contents of the buffer tail and the adjacent heap chunk."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 4.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T13:10:24.023Z",
"orgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
"shortName": "NLnet Labs"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-56416.txt"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "This issue is fixed starting with version 1.25.2"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Issue reported by Qifan Zhang"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "NLnet Labs shares patch"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Qifan Zhang verifies patch"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Fixes released with version 1.25.2"
}
],
"title": "Possible heap buffer overflow when validator canonicalizes RDATA that contains domain name",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
"assignerShortName": "NLnet Labs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-56416",
"datePublished": "2026-07-22T13:10:24.023Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-22T12:27:22.810Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T14:00:45.744Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-56416\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-07-22T13:59:48.705600Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-22T14:00:41.776Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Possible heap buffer overflow when validator canonicalizes RDATA that contains domain name\", \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Qifan Zhang (Palo Alto Networks)\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 4.8, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"NLnet Labs\", \"product\": \"Unbound\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"1.25.2\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"timeline\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2026-05-05T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Issue reported by Qifan Zhang\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2026-05-29T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"NLnet Labs shares patch\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2026-06-03T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Qifan Zhang verifies patch\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Fixes released with version 1.25.2\"}], \"solutions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"This issue is fixed starting with version 1.25.2\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-56416.txt\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"cvelib 1.8.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"In NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.1, when the validator builds the canonical RDATA form for an RRSIG-covered PX/RP/MINFO/SOA RRset, it computes the address of the second embedded domain name as \u0027datstart + dname_valid(datstart, ...)\u0027 and passes it straight to \u0027query_dname_tolower()\u0027 without checking that a second name is actually present in the RDATA. The wire-format parser accepts multi-dname RRs whose RDATA ends after the first name, so an attacker who runs a DNSSEC-signed authoritative server can deliver a record with an absent second domain name (e.g. SOA record) and cause \u0027query_dname_tolower()\u0027 to walk label-by-label through stale bytes in the per-worker \u0027env-\u003escratch_buffer\u0027, past the end of that heap allocation if \u0027msg-buffer-size\u0027 has been lowered from the default. This leads to heap buffer overflow and on a release build the outcome relies heavily on the contents of the buffer tail and the adjacent heap chunk.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-354\", \"description\": \"CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6\", \"shortName\": \"NLnet Labs\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-22T13:10:24.023Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-56416\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-22T14:00:45.744Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-06-22T12:27:22.810Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-07-22T13:10:24.023Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"NLnet Labs\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…