CVE-2026-46560 (GCVE-0-2026-46560)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-10-30 18:36
Modified
2026-11-05 02:27
CWE
  • CWE-347 - Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Summary
Open Access Management (OpenAM) is an access management solution. Prior to 16.1.1, the `RADIUS` authentication module opens an unconnected datagram socket and trusts the first UDP datagram received on the client source port. The receive path does not verify the source IP and port, match the response identifier to the outstanding request, or verify the RFC 2865 `Response Authenticator`; the RFC 2869 `Message-Authenticator` is neither sent nor required. Any non-Reject/non-Challenge packet is treated as success. On a deployment with a `RADIUS` module instance enabled on a login chain, an unauthenticated network attacker can race the real server on-path or spray forged `Access-Accept` packets off-path and obtain a session for any `RADIUS`-mapped username without knowing the shared secret. Unlike CVE-2024-3596, exploitation requires no MD5 chosen-prefix forgery because no response authenticator is checked. The resulting session carries the impersonated principal's privileges. This issue is fixed in version 16.1.1.
Impacted products
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-46560",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-11-05T02:27:47.324486Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T02:27:55.602Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "OpenAM",
          "vendor": "OpenIdentityPlatform",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 16.1.1"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Open Access Management (OpenAM) is an access management solution. Prior to 16.1.1, the `RADIUS` authentication module opens an unconnected datagram socket and trusts the first UDP datagram received on the client source port. The receive path does not verify the source IP and port, match the response identifier to the outstanding request, or verify the RFC 2865 `Response Authenticator`; the RFC 2869 `Message-Authenticator` is neither sent nor required. Any non-Reject/non-Challenge packet is treated as success. On a deployment with a `RADIUS` module instance enabled on a login chain, an unauthenticated network attacker can race the real server on-path or spray forged `Access-Accept` packets off-path and obtain a session for any `RADIUS`-mapped username without knowing the shared secret. Unlike CVE-2024-3596, exploitation requires no MD5 chosen-prefix forgery because no response authenticator is checked. The resulting session carries the impersonated principal\u0027s privileges. This issue is fixed in version 16.1.1."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-347",
              "description": "CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-10-30T18:36:24.763Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM/security/advisories/GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM/security/advisories/GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM/commit/5a0c10eccd1d45aaeb5575bbe7f7b1d01964a775",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM/commit/5a0c10eccd1d45aaeb5575bbe7f7b1d01964a775"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM/releases/tag/16.1.1",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM/releases/tag/16.1.1"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "OpenAM Authentication Bypass via RADIUS Spoofing"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-46560",
    "datePublished": "2026-10-30T18:36:24.763Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-14T20:42:31.370Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-11-05T02:27:55.602Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-46560\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-11-05T02:27:47.324486Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-11-05T02:27:51.738Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"OpenAM Authentication Bypass via RADIUS Spoofing\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"attackVector\": \"ADJACENT_NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"OpenIdentityPlatform\", \"product\": \"OpenAM\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 16.1.1\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM/security/advisories/GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM/security/advisories/GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM/commit/5a0c10eccd1d45aaeb5575bbe7f7b1d01964a775\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM/commit/5a0c10eccd1d45aaeb5575bbe7f7b1d01964a775\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM/releases/tag/16.1.1\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM/releases/tag/16.1.1\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Open Access Management (OpenAM) is an access management solution. Prior to 16.1.1, the `RADIUS` authentication module opens an unconnected datagram socket and trusts the first UDP datagram received on the client source port. The receive path does not verify the source IP and port, match the response identifier to the outstanding request, or verify the RFC 2865 `Response Authenticator`; the RFC 2869 `Message-Authenticator` is neither sent nor required. Any non-Reject/non-Challenge packet is treated as success. On a deployment with a `RADIUS` module instance enabled on a login chain, an unauthenticated network attacker can race the real server on-path or spray forged `Access-Accept` packets off-path and obtain a session for any `RADIUS`-mapped username without knowing the shared secret. Unlike CVE-2024-3596, exploitation requires no MD5 chosen-prefix forgery because no response authenticator is checked. The resulting session carries the impersonated principal\u0027s privileges. This issue is fixed in version 16.1.1.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-347\", \"description\": \"CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-30T18:36:24.763Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-46560\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-11-05T02:27:55.602Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-05-14T20:42:31.370Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-10-30T18:36:24.763Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…