CVE-2026-4370 (GCVE-0-2026-4370)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-04-01 08:09
Modified
2026-04-08 07:27
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
Summary
A vulnerability was identified in Juju from version 3.2.0 until 3.6.19 and from version 4.0 until 4.0.4, where the internal Dqlite database cluster fails to perform proper TLS client and server authentication. Specifically, the Juju controller's database endpoint does not validate client certificates when a new node attempts to join the cluster. An unauthenticated attacker with network reachability to the Juju controller's Dqlite port can exploit this flaw to join the database cluster. Once joined, the attacker gains full read and write access to the underlying database, allowing for total data compromise.
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-4370",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-01T13:00:31.628747Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-01T13:01:08.226Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com/juju/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "juju",
"platforms": [
"Linux"
],
"product": "Juju",
"repo": "https://github.com/juju/juju",
"vendor": "Canonical",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.6.20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.0.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Harry Pidcock"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "analyst",
"value": "Thomas Miller"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Joseph Phillips"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Ian Booth"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability was identified in Juju from version 3.2.0 until 3.6.19 and from version 4.0 until 4.0.4, where the internal Dqlite database cluster fails to perform proper TLS client and server authentication. Specifically, the Juju controller\u0027s database endpoint does not validate client certificates when a new node attempts to join the cluster. An unauthenticated attacker with network reachability to the Juju controller\u0027s Dqlite port can exploit this flaw to join the database cluster. Once joined, the attacker gains full read and write access to the underlying database, allowing for total data compromise."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-115",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-115 Authentication Bypass"
}
]
},
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-94",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-94 Adversary in the Middle (AiTM)"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295 Improper certificate validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-306",
"description": "CWE-306 Missing authentication for critical function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T07:27:16.821Z",
"orgId": "cc1ad9ee-3454-478d-9317-d3e869d708bc",
"shortName": "canonical"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/juju/juju/security/advisories/GHSA-gvrj-cjch-728p"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Improper TLS Client/Server authentication and certificate verification on Database Cluster"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "cc1ad9ee-3454-478d-9317-d3e869d708bc",
"assignerShortName": "canonical",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-4370",
"datePublished": "2026-04-01T08:09:17.570Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-18T08:46:09.947Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T07:27:16.821Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-4370\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-04-01T13:00:31.628747Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-01T13:00:43.615Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Improper TLS Client/Server authentication and certificate verification on Database Cluster\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"INTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Harry Pidcock\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"analyst\", \"value\": \"Thomas Miller\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation developer\", \"value\": \"Joseph Phillips\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"coordinator\", \"value\": \"Ian Booth\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-115\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-115 Authentication Bypass\"}]}, {\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-94\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-94 Adversary in the Middle (AiTM)\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"CHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 10, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"repo\": \"https://github.com/juju/juju\", \"vendor\": \"Canonical\", \"product\": \"Juju\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.2.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.6.20\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"lessThan\": \"4.0.4\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"platforms\": [\"Linux\"], \"packageName\": \"juju\", \"collectionURL\": \"https://github.com/juju/\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/juju/juju/security/advisories/GHSA-gvrj-cjch-728p\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"A vulnerability was identified in Juju from version 3.2.0 until 3.6.19 and from version 4.0 until 4.0.4, where the internal Dqlite database cluster fails to perform proper TLS client and server authentication. Specifically, the Juju controller\u0027s database endpoint does not validate client certificates when a new node attempts to join the cluster. An unauthenticated attacker with network reachability to the Juju controller\u0027s Dqlite port can exploit this flaw to join the database cluster. Once joined, the attacker gains full read and write access to the underlying database, allowing for total data compromise.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-295\", \"description\": \"CWE-295 Improper certificate validation\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-306\", \"description\": \"CWE-306 Missing authentication for critical function\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"cc1ad9ee-3454-478d-9317-d3e869d708bc\", \"shortName\": \"canonical\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-08T07:27:16.821Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-4370\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-08T07:27:16.821Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-03-18T08:46:09.947Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"cc1ad9ee-3454-478d-9317-d3e869d708bc\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-04-01T08:09:17.570Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"canonical\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…