CVE-2026-42960 (GCVE-0-2026-42960)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-20 09:21 – Updated: 2026-05-20 13:04
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Possible cache poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section
Summary
NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.0 is vulnerable to poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section. Promiscuous RRSets that complement DNS replies in the authority section can be used to trick Unbound to cache such records. If an adversary is able to attach such records in a reply (i.e., spoofed packet, fragmentation attack) he would be able to poison Unbound's cache. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by injecting RRSets other than NS that are also accompanied by address records in a reply, for example MX. This could be achieved by trying to spoof a reply packet or fragmentation attacks. Unbound would then accept the relative address records in the additional section and cache them if the authority RRSet has enough trust at this point, i.e., in-zone data for the delegation point. Unbound 1.25.1 contains a patch with a fix that disregards address records from the additional section if they are not explicitly relevant only to authority NS records, mitigating the possible poison effect. This is a complement fix to CVE-2025-11411.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-05-20 13:04 UTC
CWE
- CWE-349 - Acceptance of Extraneous Untrusted Data With Trusted Data
Assigner
NLnet Labs
CNA
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-20… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NLnet Labs | Unbound |
Affected:
0 , < 1.25.1
(semver)
|
Date Public
2026-05-20 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42960",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-20T13:04:22.642063Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-20T13:04:34.933Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Unbound",
"vendor": "NLnet Labs",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.25.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "TaoFei Guo (Peking University)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Yang Luo (Tsinghua University)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "JianJun Chen (Tsinghua University)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-20T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.0 is vulnerable to poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section. Promiscuous RRSets that complement DNS replies in the authority section can be used to trick Unbound to cache such records. If an adversary is able to attach such records in a reply (i.e., spoofed packet, fragmentation attack) he would be able to poison Unbound\u0027s cache. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by injecting RRSets other than NS that are also accompanied by address records in a reply, for example MX. This could be achieved by trying to spoof a reply packet or fragmentation attacks. Unbound would then accept the relative address records in the additional section and cache them if the authority RRSet has enough trust at this point, i.e., in-zone data for the delegation point. Unbound 1.25.1 contains a patch with a fix that disregards address records from the additional section if they are not explicitly relevant only to authority NS records, mitigating the possible poison effect. This is a complement fix to CVE-2025-11411."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/U:Amber",
"version": "4.0"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-349",
"description": "CWE-349: Acceptance of Extraneous Untrusted Data With Trusted Data",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-20T09:21:02.070Z",
"orgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
"shortName": "NLnet Labs"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-42960.txt"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "This issue is fixed starting with version 1.25.1"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-11-28T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Issue reported by TaoFei Guo"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-11-28T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "NLnet Labs acknowledges the report"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-12-22T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "NLnet Labs shares a patch"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "TaoFei Guo verifies patch"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-20T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Fixes released with version 1.25.1"
}
],
"title": "Possible cache poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
"assignerShortName": "NLnet Labs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42960",
"datePublished": "2026-05-20T09:21:02.070Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-07T10:13:43.999Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-20T13:04:34.933Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42960",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-20T13:04:22.642063Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-20T13:04:27.808Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Unbound",
"vendor": "NLnet Labs",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.25.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "TaoFei Guo (Peking University)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Yang Luo (Tsinghua University)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "JianJun Chen (Tsinghua University)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-20T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.0 is vulnerable to poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section. Promiscuous RRSets that complement DNS replies in the authority section can be used to trick Unbound to cache such records. If an adversary is able to attach such records in a reply (i.e., spoofed packet, fragmentation attack) he would be able to poison Unbound\u0027s cache. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by injecting RRSets other than NS that are also accompanied by address records in a reply, for example MX. This could be achieved by trying to spoof a reply packet or fragmentation attacks. Unbound would then accept the relative address records in the additional section and cache them if the authority RRSet has enough trust at this point, i.e., in-zone data for the delegation point. Unbound 1.25.1 contains a patch with a fix that disregards address records from the additional section if they are not explicitly relevant only to authority NS records, mitigating the possible poison effect. This is a complement fix to CVE-2025-11411."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/U:Amber",
"version": "4.0"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-349",
"description": "CWE-349: Acceptance of Extraneous Untrusted Data With Trusted Data",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-20T09:21:02.070Z",
"orgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
"shortName": "NLnet Labs"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-42960.txt"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "This issue is fixed starting with version 1.25.1"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-11-28T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Issue reported by TaoFei Guo"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-11-28T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "NLnet Labs acknowledges the report"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-12-22T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "NLnet Labs shares a patch"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "TaoFei Guo verifies patch"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-20T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Fixes released with version 1.25.1"
}
],
"title": "Possible cache poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
"assignerShortName": "NLnet Labs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42960",
"datePublished": "2026-05-20T09:21:02.070Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-07T10:13:43.999Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-20T13:04:34.933Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.