CVE-2026-34604 (GCVE-0-2026-34604)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-04-01 16:05
Modified
2026-04-01 17:59
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
Summary
Tina is a headless content management system. Prior to version 2.2.2, @tinacms/graphql uses string-based path containment checks in FilesystemBridge. That blocks plain ../ traversal, but it does not resolve symlink or junction targets. If a symlink/junction already exists under the allowed content root, a path like content/posts/pivot/owned.md is still considered "inside" the base even though the real filesystem target can be outside it. As a result, FilesystemBridge.get(), put(), delete(), and glob() can operate on files outside the intended root. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.2.
References
| URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-34604",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-01T17:59:42.739451Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-01T17:59:46.120Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/tinacms/tinacms/security/advisories/GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "tinacms",
"vendor": "tinacms",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.2.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Tina is a headless content management system. Prior to version 2.2.2, @tinacms/graphql uses string-based path containment checks in FilesystemBridge. That blocks plain ../ traversal, but it does not resolve symlink or junction targets. If a symlink/junction already exists under the allowed content root, a path like content/posts/pivot/owned.md is still considered \"inside\" the base even though the real filesystem target can be outside it. As a result, FilesystemBridge.get(), put(), delete(), and glob() can operate on files outside the intended root. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-22",
"description": "CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-59",
"description": "CWE-59: Improper Link Resolution Before File Access (\u0027Link Following\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-01T16:05:15.196Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/tinacms/tinacms/security/advisories/GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/tinacms/tinacms/security/advisories/GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/tinacms/tinacms/commit/f124eabaca10dac9a4d765c9e4135813c4830955",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/tinacms/tinacms/commit/f124eabaca10dac9a4d765c9e4135813c4830955"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "@tinacms/graphql\u0027s `FilesystemBridge` Path Validation Can Be Bypassed via Symlinks or Junctions"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-34604",
"datePublished": "2026-04-01T16:05:15.196Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-30T17:15:52.500Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-01T17:59:46.120Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-34604\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-04-01T17:59:42.739451Z\"}}}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/tinacms/tinacms/security/advisories/GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67\", \"tags\": [\"exploit\"]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-01T17:59:37.575Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"@tinacms/graphql\u0027s `FilesystemBridge` Path Validation Can Be Bypassed via Symlinks or Junctions\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.1, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"tinacms\", \"product\": \"tinacms\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 2.2.2\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/tinacms/tinacms/security/advisories/GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/tinacms/tinacms/security/advisories/GHSA-g9c2-gf25-3x67\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/tinacms/tinacms/commit/f124eabaca10dac9a4d765c9e4135813c4830955\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/tinacms/tinacms/commit/f124eabaca10dac9a4d765c9e4135813c4830955\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Tina is a headless content management system. Prior to version 2.2.2, @tinacms/graphql uses string-based path containment checks in FilesystemBridge. That blocks plain ../ traversal, but it does not resolve symlink or junction targets. If a symlink/junction already exists under the allowed content root, a path like content/posts/pivot/owned.md is still considered \\\"inside\\\" the base even though the real filesystem target can be outside it. As a result, FilesystemBridge.get(), put(), delete(), and glob() can operate on files outside the intended root. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.2.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-22\", \"description\": \"CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-59\", \"description\": \"CWE-59: Improper Link Resolution Before File Access (\u0027Link Following\u0027)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-01T16:05:15.196Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-34604\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-04-01T17:59:46.120Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-03-30T17:15:52.500Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-04-01T16:05:15.196Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…