CVE-2026-26275 (GCVE-0-2026-26275)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-19 21:25 – Updated: 2026-02-20 15:42
VLAI
Title
httpsig-hyper has Improper Digest Verification that May Allow Message Integrity Bypass
Summary
httpsig-hyper is a hyper extension for http message signatures. An issue was discovered in `httpsig-hyper` prior to version 0.0.23 where Digest header verification could incorrectly succeed due to misuse of Rust's `matches!` macro. Specifically, the comparison `if matches!(digest, _expected_digest)` treated `_expected_digest` as a pattern binding rather than a value comparison, resulting in unconditional success of the match expression. As a consequence, digest verification could incorrectly return success even when the computed digest did not match the expected value. Applications relying on Digest verification as part of HTTP message signature validation may therefore fail to detect message body modification. The severity depends on how the library is integrated and whether additional signature validation layers are enforced. This issue has been fixed in `httpsig-hyper` 0.0.23. The fix replaces the incorrect `matches!` usage with proper value comparison and additionally introduces constant-time comparison for digest verification as defense-in-depth. Regression tests have also been added to prevent reintroduction of this issue. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to the patched version. There is no reliable workaround without upgrading. Users who cannot immediately upgrade should avoid relying solely on Digest verification for message integrity and ensure that full HTTP message signature verification is enforced at the application layer.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-02-20 15:32 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
  • CWE-697 - Incorrect Comparison
Assigner
GitHub_M CNA
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
junkurihara httpsig-rs Affected: < 0.0.23
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-26275",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-02-20T15:32:12.586184Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-02-20T15:42:05.498Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "httpsig-rs",
          "vendor": "junkurihara",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 0.0.23"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "httpsig-hyper is a hyper extension for http message signatures. An issue was discovered in `httpsig-hyper` prior to version 0.0.23 where Digest header verification could incorrectly succeed due to misuse of Rust\u0027s `matches!` macro. Specifically, the comparison `if matches!(digest, _expected_digest)` treated `_expected_digest` as a pattern binding rather than a value comparison, resulting in unconditional success of the match expression. As a consequence, digest verification could incorrectly return success even when the computed digest did not match the expected value. Applications relying on Digest verification as part of HTTP message signature validation may therefore fail to detect message body modification. The severity depends on how the library is integrated and whether additional signature validation layers are enforced. This issue has been fixed in `httpsig-hyper` 0.0.23. The fix replaces the incorrect `matches!` usage with proper value comparison and additionally introduces constant-time comparison for digest verification as defense-in-depth. Regression tests have also been added to prevent reintroduction of this issue. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to the patched version. There is no reliable workaround without upgrading. Users who cannot immediately upgrade should avoid relying solely on Digest verification for message integrity and ensure that full HTTP message signature verification is enforced at the application layer."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-354",
              "description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-697",
              "description": "CWE-697: Incorrect Comparison",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-02-19T21:25:37.335Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/security/advisories/GHSA-7v42-g35v-xrch",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/security/advisories/GHSA-7v42-g35v-xrch"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/pull/14",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/pull/14"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/pull/15",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/pull/15"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/commit/5533f596c650377e02f4aa9e3eb8dba591b87370",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/commit/5533f596c650377e02f4aa9e3eb8dba591b87370"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/commit/65cbd19b395180a4bba09a89746c4b14ccb8d297",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/commit/65cbd19b395180a4bba09a89746c4b14ccb8d297"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-7v42-g35v-xrch",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "httpsig-hyper has Improper Digest Verification that May Allow Message Integrity Bypass"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-26275",
    "datePublished": "2026-02-19T21:25:37.335Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-02-12T17:10:53.413Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-02-20T15:42:05.498Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": {
        "adp": [
          {
            "metrics": [
              {
                "other": {
                  "content": {
                    "id": "CVE-2026-26275",
                    "options": [
                      {
                        "Exploitation": "none"
                      },
                      {
                        "Automatable": "yes"
                      },
                      {
                        "Technical Impact": "partial"
                      }
                    ],
                    "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                    "timestamp": "2026-02-20T15:32:12.586184Z",
                    "version": "2.0.3"
                  },
                  "type": "ssvc"
                }
              }
            ],
            "providerMetadata": {
              "dateUpdated": "2026-02-20T15:32:14.371Z",
              "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
            },
            "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
          }
        ],
        "cna": {
          "affected": [
            {
              "product": "httpsig-rs",
              "vendor": "junkurihara",
              "versions": [
                {
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "\u003c 0.0.23"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "httpsig-hyper is a hyper extension for http message signatures. An issue was discovered in `httpsig-hyper` prior to version 0.0.23 where Digest header verification could incorrectly succeed due to misuse of Rust\u0027s `matches!` macro. Specifically, the comparison `if matches!(digest, _expected_digest)` treated `_expected_digest` as a pattern binding rather than a value comparison, resulting in unconditional success of the match expression. As a consequence, digest verification could incorrectly return success even when the computed digest did not match the expected value. Applications relying on Digest verification as part of HTTP message signature validation may therefore fail to detect message body modification. The severity depends on how the library is integrated and whether additional signature validation layers are enforced. This issue has been fixed in `httpsig-hyper` 0.0.23. The fix replaces the incorrect `matches!` usage with proper value comparison and additionally introduces constant-time comparison for digest verification as defense-in-depth. Regression tests have also been added to prevent reintroduction of this issue. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to the patched version. There is no reliable workaround without upgrading. Users who cannot immediately upgrade should avoid relying solely on Digest verification for message integrity and ensure that full HTTP message signature verification is enforced at the application layer."
            }
          ],
          "metrics": [
            {
              "cvssV3_1": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "baseScore": 7.5,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
                "version": "3.1"
              }
            }
          ],
          "problemTypes": [
            {
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "cweId": "CWE-354",
                  "description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
                  "lang": "en",
                  "type": "CWE"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "cweId": "CWE-697",
                  "description": "CWE-697: Incorrect Comparison",
                  "lang": "en",
                  "type": "CWE"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "providerMetadata": {
            "dateUpdated": "2026-02-19T21:25:37.335Z",
            "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
            "shortName": "GitHub_M"
          },
          "references": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/security/advisories/GHSA-7v42-g35v-xrch",
              "tags": [
                "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/security/advisories/GHSA-7v42-g35v-xrch"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/pull/14",
              "tags": [
                "x_refsource_MISC"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/pull/14"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/pull/15",
              "tags": [
                "x_refsource_MISC"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/pull/15"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/commit/5533f596c650377e02f4aa9e3eb8dba591b87370",
              "tags": [
                "x_refsource_MISC"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/commit/5533f596c650377e02f4aa9e3eb8dba591b87370"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/commit/65cbd19b395180a4bba09a89746c4b14ccb8d297",
              "tags": [
                "x_refsource_MISC"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/commit/65cbd19b395180a4bba09a89746c4b14ccb8d297"
            }
          ],
          "source": {
            "advisory": "GHSA-7v42-g35v-xrch",
            "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
          },
          "title": "httpsig-hyper has Improper Digest Verification that May Allow Message Integrity Bypass"
        }
      },
      "cveMetadata": {
        "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
        "cveId": "CVE-2026-26275",
        "datePublished": "2026-02-19T21:25:37.335Z",
        "dateReserved": "2026-02-12T17:10:53.413Z",
        "dateUpdated": "2026-02-20T15:42:05.498Z",
        "state": "PUBLISHED"
      },
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.