CVE-2026-24850 (GCVE-0-2026-24850)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-28 00:24 – Updated: 2026-01-28 14:54
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
ML-DSA Signature Verification Accepts Signatures with Repeated Hint Indices
Summary
The ML-DSA crate is a Rust implementation of the Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard (ML-DSA). Starting in version 0.0.4 and prior to version 0.1.0-rc.4, the ML-DSA signature verification implementation in the RustCrypto `ml-dsa` crate incorrectly accepts signatures with repeated (duplicate) hint indices. According to the ML-DSA specification (FIPS 204 / RFC 9881), hint indices within each polynomial must be **strictly increasing**. The current implementation uses a non-strict monotonic check (`<=` instead of `<`), allowing duplicate indices. This is a regression bug. The original implementation was correct, but a commit in version 0.0.4 inadvertently changed the strict `<` comparison to `<=`, introducing the vulnerability. Version 0.1.0-rc.4 fixes the issue.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-01-28 14:53 UTC
CWE
- CWE-347 - Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Assigner
GitHub_M
CNA
References
11 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/security… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/issues/894 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/pull/895 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/commit/4… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/commit/b… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/204/final | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9881 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof/blob/master/te… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof/blob/master/te… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof/blob/master/te… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RustCrypto | signatures |
Affected:
>= 0.0.4, < 0.1.0-rc.4
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-24850",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-28T14:53:25.394412Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-28T14:54:22.827Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "signatures",
"vendor": "RustCrypto",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.0.4, \u003c 0.1.0-rc.4"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The ML-DSA crate is a Rust implementation of the Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard (ML-DSA). Starting in version 0.0.4 and prior to version 0.1.0-rc.4, the ML-DSA signature verification implementation in the RustCrypto `ml-dsa` crate incorrectly accepts signatures with repeated (duplicate) hint indices. According to the ML-DSA specification (FIPS 204 / RFC 9881), hint indices within each polynomial must be **strictly increasing**. The current implementation uses a non-strict monotonic check (`\u003c=` instead of `\u003c`), allowing duplicate indices. This is a regression bug. The original implementation was correct, but a commit in version 0.0.4 inadvertently changed the strict `\u003c` comparison to `\u003c=`, introducing the vulnerability. Version 0.1.0-rc.4 fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-28T00:24:53.146Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/security/advisories/GHSA-5x2r-hc65-25f9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/security/advisories/GHSA-5x2r-hc65-25f9"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/issues/894",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/issues/894"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/pull/895",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/pull/895"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/commit/400961412be2e2ab787942cf30e0a9b66b37a54a",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/commit/400961412be2e2ab787942cf30e0a9b66b37a54a"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/commit/b01c3b73dd08d0094e089aa234f78b6089ec1f38",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/commit/b01c3b73dd08d0094e089aa234f78b6089ec1f38"
},
{
"name": "https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/204/final",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/204/final"
},
{
"name": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9881",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9881"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof/blob/master/testvectors_v1/mldsa_44_verify_test.json",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof/blob/master/testvectors_v1/mldsa_44_verify_test.json"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof/blob/master/testvectors_v1/mldsa_65_verify_test.json",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof/blob/master/testvectors_v1/mldsa_65_verify_test.json"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof/blob/master/testvectors_v1/mldsa_87_verify_test.json",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof/blob/master/testvectors_v1/mldsa_87_verify_test.json"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-5x2r-hc65-25f9",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "ML-DSA Signature Verification Accepts Signatures with Repeated Hint Indices"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-24850",
"datePublished": "2026-01-28T00:24:53.146Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-27T14:51:03.060Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-28T14:54:22.827Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-24850",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-28T14:53:25.394412Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-28T14:54:14.295Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "signatures",
"vendor": "RustCrypto",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.0.4, \u003c 0.1.0-rc.4"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The ML-DSA crate is a Rust implementation of the Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard (ML-DSA). Starting in version 0.0.4 and prior to version 0.1.0-rc.4, the ML-DSA signature verification implementation in the RustCrypto `ml-dsa` crate incorrectly accepts signatures with repeated (duplicate) hint indices. According to the ML-DSA specification (FIPS 204 / RFC 9881), hint indices within each polynomial must be **strictly increasing**. The current implementation uses a non-strict monotonic check (`\u003c=` instead of `\u003c`), allowing duplicate indices. This is a regression bug. The original implementation was correct, but a commit in version 0.0.4 inadvertently changed the strict `\u003c` comparison to `\u003c=`, introducing the vulnerability. Version 0.1.0-rc.4 fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-28T00:24:53.146Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/security/advisories/GHSA-5x2r-hc65-25f9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/security/advisories/GHSA-5x2r-hc65-25f9"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/issues/894",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/issues/894"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/pull/895",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/pull/895"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/commit/400961412be2e2ab787942cf30e0a9b66b37a54a",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/commit/400961412be2e2ab787942cf30e0a9b66b37a54a"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/commit/b01c3b73dd08d0094e089aa234f78b6089ec1f38",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RustCrypto/signatures/commit/b01c3b73dd08d0094e089aa234f78b6089ec1f38"
},
{
"name": "https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/204/final",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/204/final"
},
{
"name": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9881",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9881"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof/blob/master/testvectors_v1/mldsa_44_verify_test.json",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof/blob/master/testvectors_v1/mldsa_44_verify_test.json"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof/blob/master/testvectors_v1/mldsa_65_verify_test.json",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof/blob/master/testvectors_v1/mldsa_65_verify_test.json"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof/blob/master/testvectors_v1/mldsa_87_verify_test.json",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/C2SP/wycheproof/blob/master/testvectors_v1/mldsa_87_verify_test.json"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-5x2r-hc65-25f9",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "ML-DSA Signature Verification Accepts Signatures with Repeated Hint Indices"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-24850",
"datePublished": "2026-01-28T00:24:53.146Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-27T14:51:03.060Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-28T14:54:22.827Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.