CVE-2026-123877 (GCVE-0-2026-123877)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-11 18:28 – Updated: 2026-11-11 18:28
VLAI
Title
Node.js is vulnerable to a certificate validation bypass in https.Agent via cross-policy TLS session reuse
Summary
A certificate validation bypass in Node.js https.Agent lets a cached TLS session authenticated under one CA policy be reused by a later request with a stricter policy. https.Agent.prototype.getName() assigns the same Agent and session-cache key to a request that omits ca and one that explicitly supplies ca: [], because an omitted value appends nothing to the key while an empty array stringifies to an empty string. The two policies differ: omitting ca uses the default trust store, while supplying ca replaces it. Since they share a key, a TLS session authenticated under the broader default policy is handed to a new connection made under the later ca: [] policy, and TLS 1.3 session resumption carries the earlier authentication forward, so the second request reports authorized === true and transmits confidential data to a server its own CA policy would reject on a fresh connection. This vulnerability affects Node.js 26.x, 24.x, and 22.x.
CWE
  • CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
openjs CNA
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
nodejs node Affected: 0.0.0 , < 22.23.5 (semver)
Affected: 23.0.0 , < 24.22.3 (semver)
Affected: 25.0.0 , < 26.13.1 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "node",
          "vendor": "nodejs",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "22.23.5",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "24.22.3",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "23.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "26.13.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "25.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "aegis1337 and mickeyjoe"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "mcollina"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "coordinator",
          "value": "aduh95"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/markdown",
              "value": "A certificate validation bypass in Node.js `https.Agent` lets a cached TLS session authenticated under one CA policy be reused by a later request with a stricter policy. `https.Agent.prototype.getName()` assigns the same Agent and session-cache key to a request that omits `ca` and one that explicitly supplies `ca: []`, because an omitted value appends nothing to the key while an empty array stringifies to an empty string. The two policies differ: omitting `ca` uses the default trust store, while supplying `ca` replaces it. Since they share a key, a TLS session authenticated under the broader default policy is handed to a new connection made under the later `ca: []` policy, and TLS 1.3 session resumption carries the earlier authentication forward, so the second request reports `authorized === true` and transmits confidential data to a server its own CA policy would reject on a fresh connection. This vulnerability affects Node.js 26.x, 24.x, and 22.x."
            }
          ],
          "value": "A certificate validation bypass in Node.js https.Agent lets a cached TLS session authenticated under one CA policy be reused by a later request with a stricter policy. https.Agent.prototype.getName() assigns the same Agent and session-cache key to a request that omits ca and one that explicitly supplies ca: [], because an omitted value appends nothing to the key while an empty array stringifies to an empty string. The two policies differ: omitting ca uses the default trust store, while supplying ca replaces it. Since they share a key, a TLS session authenticated under the broader default policy is handed to a new connection made under the later ca: [] policy, and TLS 1.3 session resumption carries the earlier authentication forward, so the second request reports authorized === true and transmits confidential data to a server its own CA policy would reject on a fresh connection. This vulnerability affects Node.js 26.x, 24.x, and 22.x."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_0": {
            "baseScore": 6.8,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.0"
          },
          "format": "CVSS"
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-295",
              "description": "Improper Certificate Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-11-11T18:28:38.494Z",
        "orgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
        "shortName": "openjs"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/november-2026-security-releases"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Node.js is vulnerable to a certificate validation bypass in https.Agent via cross-policy TLS session reuse",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "nodejs-private/security-release publish-cves"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
    "assignerShortName": "openjs",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-123877",
    "datePublished": "2026-11-11T18:28:38.494Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-11-06T16:32:30.304Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-11-11T18:28:38.494Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.