CVE-2026-116672 (GCVE-0-2026-116672)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-10-27 16:31
Modified
2026-10-27 16:31
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
Summary
Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. From 0.15 until 1.9.1, the documented ClientConfigurationEndpoint.authenticate_client and ClientConfigurationEndpoint.check_permission reference implementations look up a target client from request-controlled client_id data and check only whether that target is editable, without verifying that request.credential belongs to the target client. Deployments following both examples can allow a client holding any valid registration access token to read, modify, or delete another client's registration. Changing redirect_uris can enable authorization code or token interception, while deleting registrations can deny service to affected clients. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "authlib",
"vendor": "authlib",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.15, \u003c 1.9.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. From 0.15 until 1.9.1, the documented ClientConfigurationEndpoint.authenticate_client and ClientConfigurationEndpoint.check_permission reference implementations look up a target client from request-controlled client_id data and check only whether that target is editable, without verifying that request.credential belongs to the target client. Deployments following both examples can allow a client holding any valid registration access token to read, modify, or delete another client\u0027s registration. Changing redirect_uris can enable authorization code or token interception, while deleting registrations can deny service to affected clients. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1188",
"description": "CWE-1188: Insecure Default Initialization of Resource",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-27T16:31:48.429Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/security/advisories/GHSA-c73q-w75p-j82v",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/security/advisories/GHSA-c73q-w75p-j82v"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/commit/1bd2a313492ce0a4d0571c150730907aa3fc91ff",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/commit/1bd2a313492ce0a4d0571c150730907aa3fc91ff"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/releases/tag/v1.9.1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/releases/tag/v1.9.1"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-c73q-w75p-j82v",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Authlib RFC 7592 examples omit registration-access-token client binding"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-116672",
"datePublished": "2026-10-27T16:31:48.429Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-26T20:00:59.828Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-27T16:31:48.429Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…