CVE-2026-109811 (GCVE-0-2026-109811)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-10 00:41 – Updated: 2026-11-10 00:41
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform (Application Server ABAP)
Summary
An internal ABAP HTTP component in SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform (Application Server ABAP) has SSRF vulnerability due to insecure default settings. An authenticated attacker with low privileges could trick the victim to interact with a malicious server which allows the attacker to access sensitive information belonging to the victim and modify limited non-sensitive information. This results in a high impact on confidentiality and low impact on integrity. Availability is not impacted.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery
Assigner
sap
CNA
References
2 references
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAP_SE | SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform (Application Server ABAP) |
Affected:
SAP_BASIS 700
Affected: SAP_BASIS 701 Affected: SAP_BASIS 702 Affected: SAP_BASIS 731 Affected: SAP_BASIS 740 Affected: SAP_BASIS 750 Affected: SAP_BASIS 751 Affected: SAP_BASIS 752 Affected: SAP_BASIS 753 Affected: SAP_BASIS 754 Affected: SAP_BASIS 755 Affected: SAP_BASIS 756 Affected: SAP_BASIS 757 Affected: SAP_BASIS 758 Affected: SAP_BASIS 816 Affected: SAP_BASIS 920 Affected: SAP_BASIS 921 |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform (Application Server ABAP)",
"vendor": "SAP_SE",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BASIS 700"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BASIS 701"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BASIS 702"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BASIS 731"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BASIS 740"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BASIS 750"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BASIS 751"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BASIS 752"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BASIS 753"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BASIS 754"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BASIS 755"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BASIS 756"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BASIS 757"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BASIS 758"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BASIS 816"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BASIS 920"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "SAP_BASIS 921"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAn internal ABAP HTTP component in SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform (Application Server ABAP) has SSRF vulnerability due to insecure default settings. An authenticated attacker with low privileges could trick the victim to interact with a malicious server which allows the attacker to access sensitive information belonging to the victim and modify limited non-sensitive information. This results in a high impact on confidentiality and low impact on integrity. Availability is not impacted.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An internal ABAP HTTP component in SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform (Application Server ABAP) has SSRF vulnerability due to insecure default settings. An authenticated attacker with low privileges could trick the victim to interact with a malicious server which allows the attacker to access sensitive information belonging to the victim and modify limited non-sensitive information. This results in a high impact on confidentiality and low impact on integrity. Availability is not impacted."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery",
"lang": "eng",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-10T00:41:08.379Z",
"orgId": "e4686d1a-f260-4930-ac4c-2f5c992778dd",
"shortName": "sap"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://me.sap.com/notes/3805959"
},
{
"url": "https://url.sap/sapsecuritypatchday"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver and ABAP Platform (Application Server ABAP)",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "e4686d1a-f260-4930-ac4c-2f5c992778dd",
"assignerShortName": "sap",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-109811",
"datePublished": "2026-11-10T00:41:08.379Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-13T03:49:31.800Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-10T00:41:08.379Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.