CVE-2026-108362 (GCVE-0-2026-108362)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-10-12 19:06
Modified
2026-10-13 15:00
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-346 - Origin Validation Error
Summary
Privasys Remote Attestation TLS Clients provides multi-language utilities for verifying attested TLS connections. Prior to 0.11.0, TEE attestation evidence in Privasys attested TLS is accepted without requiring an explicitly authorized platform identity. When a network attacker can forge evidence or extract attestation secrets from a compromised unrevoked platform, the verifier accepts valid measurements from a different unrevoked TEE platform as though they came from the intended Attester. The attacker can impersonate the attested TLS endpoint. This issue is fixed in version 0.11.0.
References
| URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Privasys | ra-tls-clients |
Version: < 0.11.0 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-108362",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-13T15:00:07.980029Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-13T15:00:30.012Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "ra-tls-clients",
"vendor": "Privasys",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.11.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Privasys Remote Attestation TLS Clients provides multi-language utilities for verifying attested TLS connections. Prior to 0.11.0, TEE attestation evidence in Privasys attested TLS is accepted without requiring an explicitly authorized platform identity. When a network attacker can forge evidence or extract attestation secrets from a compromised unrevoked platform, the verifier accepts valid measurements from a different unrevoked TEE platform as though they came from the intended Attester. The attacker can impersonate the attested TLS endpoint. This issue is fixed in version 0.11.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-346",
"description": "CWE-346: Origin Validation Error",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-12T19:06:11.348Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/Privasys/ra-tls-clients/security/advisories/GHSA-pj2x-5wqv-fh57",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Privasys/ra-tls-clients/security/advisories/GHSA-pj2x-5wqv-fh57"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/Privasys/ra-tls-clients/commit/1179ed097fdcb8519a85973a8a6c6ccbd0f50b03",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Privasys/ra-tls-clients/commit/1179ed097fdcb8519a85973a8a6c6ccbd0f50b03"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/Privasys/ra-tls-clients/releases/tag/v0.11.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Privasys/ra-tls-clients/releases/tag/v0.11.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-pj2x-5wqv-fh57",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Privasys attested TLS accepted evidence from any unrevoked TEE platform (diversion attack)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-108362",
"datePublished": "2026-10-12T19:06:11.348Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-09T20:32:44.301Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-13T15:00:30.012Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-108362\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-10-13T15:00:07.980029Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-13T15:00:14.468Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Privasys attested TLS accepted evidence from any unrevoked TEE platform (diversion attack)\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-pj2x-5wqv-fh57\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 9.1, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackRequirements\": \"PRESENT\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Privasys\", \"product\": \"ra-tls-clients\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 0.11.0\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/Privasys/ra-tls-clients/security/advisories/GHSA-pj2x-5wqv-fh57\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/Privasys/ra-tls-clients/security/advisories/GHSA-pj2x-5wqv-fh57\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/Privasys/ra-tls-clients/commit/1179ed097fdcb8519a85973a8a6c6ccbd0f50b03\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/Privasys/ra-tls-clients/commit/1179ed097fdcb8519a85973a8a6c6ccbd0f50b03\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/Privasys/ra-tls-clients/releases/tag/v0.11.0\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/Privasys/ra-tls-clients/releases/tag/v0.11.0\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Privasys Remote Attestation TLS Clients provides multi-language utilities for verifying attested TLS connections. Prior to 0.11.0, TEE attestation evidence in Privasys attested TLS is accepted without requiring an explicitly authorized platform identity. When a network attacker can forge evidence or extract attestation secrets from a compromised unrevoked platform, the verifier accepts valid measurements from a different unrevoked TEE platform as though they came from the intended Attester. The attacker can impersonate the attested TLS endpoint. This issue is fixed in version 0.11.0.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-346\", \"description\": \"CWE-346: Origin Validation Error\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-12T19:06:11.348Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-108362\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-13T15:00:30.012Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-10-09T20:32:44.301Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-10-12T19:06:11.348Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…