CVE-2026-107245 (GCVE-0-2026-107245)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-10 00:32 – Updated: 2026-11-10 00:32
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
Versa has confirmed a buffer overflow vulnerability in the IPsec implementation on VOS, aka Versa FlexVNF.
Buffer Overflow Vulnerability Description
When a maliciously crafted IKE Auth packet is sent to VOS, the vsmd process crashes, thereby resulting in a Denial of Service. An attacker can create a Denial-of-Service attack on the VOS appliances by crafting a malicious IKE Auth packet and sending it to the WAN interfaces on the VOS.
During the IKE Authentication phase, if the IKE SA negotiation fails, and the size of the Remote ID is larger than the buffer size used to process the Remote ID, it will result in a crash of the vsmd process on the VOS appliance.
What is impacted?
VOS nodes configured with IPsec VPN profiles of type controller-staging-sdwan or remote-access-server using a WAN interface as the IPsec endpoint are vulnerable. (IPsec profiles configured with an overlay interface as the IPsec endpoint are not affected.) This configuration typically applies to all Controllers, Hub Controllers, and SSE Gateways. Additionally, site-to-site VPN profiles configured without a peer IP address, hostname, or FQDN are also vulnerable.
What is not impacted?
The VOS nodes listed above are not vulnerable if they are not accessible from the Internet.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-121 - Stack Overflow
Assigner
hackerone
CNA
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Versa | VOS |
Affected:
21.1.1 , ≤ 21.2.3
(semver)
Affected: 22.1.2 , < July 2, 2026 (semver) Affected: 22.1.3 , < July 2, 2026 (semver) Affected: 22.1.4 , < July 2, 2026 (semver) Affected: 23.1.2 , < 23.1.2 (semver) Unaffected: 22.1.2 July-2-2026-Hotfix , < 22.1.2 July-2-2026-Hotfix (semver) Unaffected: 22.1.3 July-2-2026-Hotfix , < 22.1.3 July-2-2026-Hotfix (semver) Unaffected: 22.1.4 July-2-2026-Hotfix , < 22.1.4 July-2-2026-Hotfix (semver) Unaffected: 23.1.2 Aug-3-2026-Hotfix , < 23.1.2 Aug-3-2026-Hotfix (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "VOS",
"vendor": "Versa",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "21.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "21.1.1",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "July 2, 2026",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.1.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "July 2, 2026",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.1.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "July 2, 2026",
"status": "affected",
"version": "22.1.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "23.1.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "23.1.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.1.2 July-2-2026-Hotfix",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "22.1.2 July-2-2026-Hotfix",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.1.3 July-2-2026-Hotfix",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "22.1.3 July-2-2026-Hotfix",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "22.1.4 July-2-2026-Hotfix",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "22.1.4 July-2-2026-Hotfix",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "23.1.2 Aug-3-2026-Hotfix",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "23.1.2 Aug-3-2026-Hotfix",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Versa has confirmed a\u202fbuffer overflow\u202fvulnerability\u202fin the\u202fIPsec implementation\u202fon VOS, aka Versa\u202fFlexVNF. \n \n\u202fBuffer Overflow Vulnerability Description \n \nWhen a maliciously crafted IKE\u202fAuth packet is sent to VOS, the\u202fvsmd\u202fprocess crashes, thereby\u202fresulting in\u202fa Denial of Service.\u202fAn\u202fattacker\u202fcan\u202fcreate\u202fa Denial-of-Service\u202fattack on\u202fthe VOS appliances by\u202fcrafting a\u202fmalicious IKE Auth\u202fpacket and sending it to the\u202fWAN\u202finterfaces on the VOS. \n \nDuring the\u202fIKE\u202fAuthentication\u202fphase, if the IKE SA negotiation fails, and the size of the Remote ID\u202fis\u202flarger than the buffer size used to process the Remote ID,\u202fit will result in a crash of the\u202fvsmd\u202fprocess on the VOS appliance. \n \nWhat is impacted? \n \nVOS nodes configured with IPsec VPN profiles of type\u202fcontroller-staging-sdwan\u202for remote-access-server\u202fusing a WAN interface as the IPsec endpoint are vulnerable. (IPsec profiles configured with an overlay interface as the IPsec endpoint are\u202fnot\u202faffected.)\u202fThis configuration typically applies to all\u202fControllers,\u202fHub Controllers, and\u202fSSE Gateways. Additionally,\u202fsite-to-site\u202fVPN profiles configured without a peer IP address, hostname, or FQDN are also vulnerable. \n \nWhat is not impacted? \n \nThe VOS nodes listed above are not vulnerable if they are not accessible from the Internet."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-121",
"description": "CWE-121 Stack Overflow",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-10T00:32:37.094Z",
"orgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1",
"shortName": "hackerone"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://security-portal.versa-networks.com/emailbulletins/6a663c9aabeebad826bc8d29"
}
],
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Disable the\u202fstaging VPN profile\u202fon Controllers and Hub Controllers when Zero-Touch Provisioning (ZTP) over the Internet is not actively\u202frequired. Enable the profile only for the duration of device bootstrapping. \n\nFor site-to-site IPsec VPN profiles without a configured remote peer, specify the remote peer IP address, hostname, or fully qualified domain name (FQDN). \n\nIf the source IP address associated with exploitation attempts is known, configure a discard or blackhole route for that IP address to block the malicious traffic."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1",
"assignerShortName": "hackerone",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-107245",
"datePublished": "2026-11-10T00:32:37.094Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-07T15:00:00.550Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-10T00:32:37.094Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.