CVE-2026-106036 (GCVE-0-2026-106036)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-10-29 15:08
Modified
2026-10-29 15:08
CWE
  • CWE-295 - Improper certificate validation
Summary
Szafir accepts any client or server certificate without performing certificate and hostname validation, allowing HTTPS connections without authenticating the remote server. An attacker can provide an arbitrary SSL/TLS certificate and cause the application to download an update file from their server. This issue was fixed in version 2.0 build 708.
Impacted products
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Szafir",
          "vendor": "Krajowa Izba Rozliczeniowa",
          "versions": [
            {
              "changes": [
                {
                  "at": "build 708",
                  "status": "unaffected"
                }
              ],
              "lessThanOrEqual": "2.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "cpeApplicability": [
        {
          "nodes": [
            {
              "cpeMatch": [
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:krajowa_izba_rozliczeniowa:szafir:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "versionEndIncluding": "2.0",
                  "versionStartIncluding": "0",
                  "vulnerable": true
                }
              ],
              "negate": false,
              "operator": "OR"
            }
          ],
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Mikus Teivens, Critical Security"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Szafir accepts any client or server certificate without performing certificate and hostname validation, allowing HTTPS connections without authenticating the remote server. An attacker can provide an arbitrary SSL/TLS certificate and cause the application to download an update file from their server.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eThis issue was fixed in version\u0026nbsp;2.0 build 708.\u003c/div\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Szafir accepts any client or server certificate without performing certificate and hostname validation, allowing HTTPS connections without authenticating the remote server. An attacker can provide an arbitrary SSL/TLS certificate and cause the application to download an update file from their server.\n\n\n\nThis issue was fixed in version\u00a02.0 build 708."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 6.9,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-295",
              "description": "CWE-295 Improper certificate validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-10-29T15:08:02.788Z",
        "orgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
        "shortName": "CERT-PL"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://cert.pl/posts/2026/10/CVE-2026-93570"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "product"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.elektronicznypodpis.pl/"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Improper certificate validation in Szafir",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.3"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
    "assignerShortName": "CERT-PL",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-106036",
    "datePublished": "2026-10-29T15:08:02.788Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-10-06T13:51:18.839Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-10-29T15:08:02.788Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…