CVE-2026-104627 (GCVE-0-2026-104627)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-10-18 18:51
Modified
2026-10-19 20:20
CWE
  • CWE-287 - Improper Authentication
  • CWE-352 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Summary
The Gitea OpenID association callback in the security settings accepted a positive OpenID 2.0 assertion without checking that the signed-in user had started the linking. Because OpenID 2.0 allows unsolicited assertions, an attacker-controlled OpenID provider could attach the attacker's identity to the account of a signed-in victim who opened a crafted link, and the attacker could then sign in as the victim through OpenID login, which does not apply the local TOTP or WebAuthn checks. The callback now requires a time-limited `state` value bound to the user.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Gitea Gitea Version: 0   ≤ 28.1.0
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 5.4,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
              "integrityImpact": "LOW",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-104627",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-10-19T20:20:04.646263Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-10-19T20:20:15.460Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "gitea.dev",
          "product": "Gitea",
          "vendor": "Gitea",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "28.1.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "https://github.com/cyberlanc3r"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "https://github.com/u2usvc"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "https://github.com/wxiaoguang"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The Gitea OpenID association callback in the security settings accepted a positive OpenID 2.0 assertion without checking that the signed-in user had started the linking. Because OpenID 2.0 allows unsolicited assertions, an attacker-controlled OpenID provider could attach the attacker\u0027s identity to the account of a signed-in victim who opened a crafted link, and the attacker could then sign in as the victim through OpenID login, which does not apply the local TOTP or WebAuthn checks. The callback now requires a time-limited `state` value bound to the user."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-287",
              "description": "CWE-287: Improper Authentication",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            },
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-352",
              "description": "CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-10-18T18:51:06.543Z",
        "orgId": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
        "shortName": "Gitea"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-mf69-7pqq-86vx",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-mf69-7pqq-86vx"
        },
        {
          "name": "Fix: go-gitea/gitea pull request #39642",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39642"
        },
        {
          "name": "Fix backport to release/v28: go-gitea/gitea pull request #39744",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39744"
        },
        {
          "name": "Gitea 28.2.0 release announcement",
          "tags": [
            "release-notes"
          ],
          "url": "https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-28.2.0/"
        },
        {
          "name": "go-gitea/gitea v28.2.0 release",
          "tags": [
            "release-notes"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v28.2.0"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Gitea OpenID account linking without session binding"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
    "assignerShortName": "Gitea",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-104627",
    "datePublished": "2026-10-18T18:51:06.543Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-10-14T20:08:45.852Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-10-19T20:20:15.460Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"cna\": {\"title\": \"Gitea OpenID account linking without session binding\", \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"reporter\", \"value\": \"https://github.com/cyberlanc3r\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"reporter\", \"value\": \"https://github.com/u2usvc\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation developer\", \"value\": \"https://github.com/wxiaoguang\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Gitea\", \"product\": \"Gitea\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"28.1.0\"}], \"packageName\": \"gitea.dev\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-mf69-7pqq-86vx\", \"name\": \"GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-mf69-7pqq-86vx\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39642\", \"name\": \"Fix: go-gitea/gitea pull request #39642\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39744\", \"name\": \"Fix backport to release/v28: go-gitea/gitea pull request #39744\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-28.2.0/\", \"name\": \"Gitea 28.2.0 release announcement\", \"tags\": [\"release-notes\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v28.2.0\", \"name\": \"go-gitea/gitea v28.2.0 release\", \"tags\": [\"release-notes\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The Gitea OpenID association callback in the security settings accepted a positive OpenID 2.0 assertion without checking that the signed-in user had started the linking. Because OpenID 2.0 allows unsolicited assertions, an attacker-controlled OpenID provider could attach the attacker\u0027s identity to the account of a signed-in victim who opened a crafted link, and the attacker could then sign in as the victim through OpenID login, which does not apply the local TOTP or WebAuthn checks. The callback now requires a time-limited `state` value bound to the user.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-287\", \"description\": \"CWE-287: Improper Authentication\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-352\", \"description\": \"CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2\", \"shortName\": \"Gitea\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-18T18:51:06.543Z\"}}, \"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 5.4, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"REQUIRED\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-104627\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-10-19T20:20:04.646263Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-19T20:19:46.272Z\"}}]}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-104627\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-18T18:51:06.543Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-10-14T20:08:45.852Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-10-18T18:51:06.543Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"Gitea\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…