CVE-2026-103009 (GCVE-0-2026-103009)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-10-06 19:31
Modified
2026-10-06 19:52
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-639 - Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Summary
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Elasticsearch can lead to Information Disclosure via a specially crafted cross-cluster search request that references an unauthorized shard identifier. Elasticsearch contains an authorization bypass weakness in its handling of cross-cluster search requests made through the Remote Cluster Security (RCS) 2.0 model. An authorization check validates a request against one identifying attribute of the target shard, while a separate, independently-supplied identifying attribute in the same request determines which shard is actually accessed. A holder of a cross-cluster API key authorized for one index can craft a request whose two identifying attributes refer to different indices, causing the request to be authorized against an index they can access while actually operating against a different, unauthorized index. This can expose that index's document contents, field mappings, and other metadata, and in limited cases allows modification of retention-lease state on the unauthorized index.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elastic | Elasticsearch |
Version: 8.13.0 ≤ 8.19.22 Version: 9.0.0 ≤ 9.4.7 Version: 9.5.0 ≤ 9.5.4 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-103009",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-06T19:52:05.345727Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T19:52:13.370Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Elasticsearch",
"vendor": "Elastic",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "8.19.22",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.13.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "9.4.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "9.5.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9.5.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAuthorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Elasticsearch can lead to Information Disclosure via a specially crafted cross-cluster search request that references an unauthorized shard identifier. Elasticsearch contains an authorization bypass weakness in its handling of cross-cluster search requests made through the Remote Cluster Security (RCS) 2.0 model. An authorization check validates a request against one identifying attribute of the target shard, while a separate, independently-supplied identifying attribute in the same request determines which shard is actually accessed. A holder of a cross-cluster API key authorized for one index can craft a request whose two identifying attributes refer to different indices, causing the request to be authorized against an index they can access while actually operating against a different, unauthorized index. This can expose that index\u0027s document contents, field mappings, and other metadata, and in limited cases allows modification of retention-lease state on the unauthorized index.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Elasticsearch can lead to Information Disclosure via a specially crafted cross-cluster search request that references an unauthorized shard identifier. Elasticsearch contains an authorization bypass weakness in its handling of cross-cluster search requests made through the Remote Cluster Security (RCS) 2.0 model. An authorization check validates a request against one identifying attribute of the target shard, while a separate, independently-supplied identifying attribute in the same request determines which shard is actually accessed. A holder of a cross-cluster API key authorized for one index can craft a request whose two identifying attributes refer to different indices, causing the request to be authorized against an index they can access while actually operating against a different, unauthorized index. This can expose that index\u0027s document contents, field mappings, and other metadata, and in limited cases allows modification of retention-lease state on the unauthorized index."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-639",
"description": "CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T19:31:53.261Z",
"orgId": "271b6943-45a9-4f3a-ab4e-976f3fa05b5a",
"shortName": "elastic"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elasticsearch-8-19-23-9-4-8-9-5-5-security-update-esa-2026-199/390874"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "Elastic"
},
"title": "Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in Elasticsearch Leading to Information Disclosure",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Elastic CVE Publisher 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "271b6943-45a9-4f3a-ab4e-976f3fa05b5a",
"assignerShortName": "elastic",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-103009",
"datePublished": "2026-10-06T19:31:53.261Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-29T20:57:38.467Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T19:52:13.370Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"cna\": {\"affected\": [{\"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\", \"product\": \"Elasticsearch\", \"vendor\": \"Elastic\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"version\": \"8.13.0\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"8.19.22\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"version\": \"9.0.0\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"9.4.7\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"version\": \"9.5.0\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"9.5.4\"}]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Elasticsearch can lead to Information Disclosure via a specially crafted cross-cluster search request that references an unauthorized shard identifier. Elasticsearch contains an authorization bypass weakness in its handling of cross-cluster search requests made through the Remote Cluster Security (RCS) 2.0 model. An authorization check validates a request against one identifying attribute of the target shard, while a separate, independently-supplied identifying attribute in the same request determines which shard is actually accessed. A holder of a cross-cluster API key authorized for one index can craft a request whose two identifying attributes refer to different indices, causing the request to be authorized against an index they can access while actually operating against a different, unauthorized index. This can expose that index\u0027s document contents, field mappings, and other metadata, and in limited cases allows modification of retention-lease state on the unauthorized index.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"base64\": false, \"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eAuthorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Elasticsearch can lead to Information Disclosure via a specially crafted cross-cluster search request that references an unauthorized shard identifier. Elasticsearch contains an authorization bypass weakness in its handling of cross-cluster search requests made through the Remote Cluster Security (RCS) 2.0 model. An authorization check validates a request against one identifying attribute of the target shard, while a separate, independently-supplied identifying attribute in the same request determines which shard is actually accessed. A holder of a cross-cluster API key authorized for one index can craft a request whose two identifying attributes refer to different indices, causing the request to be authorized against an index they can access while actually operating against a different, unauthorized index. This can expose that index\u0027s document contents, field mappings, and other metadata, and in limited cases allows modification of retention-lease state on the unauthorized index.\u003c/p\u003e\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}], \"cvssV3_1\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 7.1, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"cweId\": \"CWE-639\", \"description\": \"CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key\", \"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"271b6943-45a9-4f3a-ab4e-976f3fa05b5a\", \"shortName\": \"elastic\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-06T19:31:53.261Z\"}, \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elasticsearch-8-19-23-9-4-8-9-5-5-security-update-esa-2026-199/390874\"}], \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"Elastic\"}, \"title\": \"Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in Elasticsearch Leading to Information Disclosure\", \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Elastic CVE Publisher 1.0.0\"}}, \"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-103009\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-10-06T19:52:05.345727Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-06T19:52:10.160Z\"}}]}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-103009\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"271b6943-45a9-4f3a-ab4e-976f3fa05b5a\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"elastic\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-09-29T20:57:38.467Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-10-06T19:31:53.261Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-10-06T19:52:13.370Z\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…