CVE-2025-69420 (GCVE-0-2025-69420)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-01-27 16:01
Modified
2026-01-28 19:33
Severity ?
CWE
  • CWE-754 - Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
Summary
Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response verification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when processing a malformed TimeStamp Response file. Impact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a malformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service. The functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2() access the signing cert attribute value without validating its type. When the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory through the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash. Exploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed TimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The TimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the exploit is just a Denial of Service. For these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the TimeStamp Response implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
OpenSSL OpenSSL Version: 3.6.0   ≤
Version: 3.5.0   ≤
Version: 3.4.0   ≤
Version: 3.3.0   ≤
Version: 3.0.0   ≤
Version: 1.1.1   < 1.1.1ze
 Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 7.5,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
              "integrityImpact": "NONE",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-69420",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-01-28T19:33:06.662569Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-01-28T19:33:41.253Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "OpenSSL",
          "vendor": "OpenSSL",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "3.6.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.6.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.5.5",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.5.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.4.4",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.4.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.3.6",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.3.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.0.19",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "1.1.1ze",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.1.1",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "Luigino Camastra (Aisle Research)"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Bob Beck"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-01-27T14:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response\u003cbr\u003everification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first\u003cbr\u003evalidating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when\u003cbr\u003eprocessing a malformed TimeStamp Response file.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a\u003cbr\u003emalformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or\u003cbr\u003eNULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2()\u003cbr\u003eaccess the signing cert attribute value without validating its type.\u003cbr\u003eWhen the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory\u003cbr\u003ethrough the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eExploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed\u003cbr\u003eTimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The\u003cbr\u003eTimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the\u003cbr\u003eexploit is just a Denial of Service. For these reasons the issue was\u003cbr\u003eassessed as Low severity.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue,\u003cbr\u003eas the TimeStamp Response implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module\u003cbr\u003eboundary.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue."
            }
          ],
          "value": "Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response\nverification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first\nvalidating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when\nprocessing a malformed TimeStamp Response file.\n\nImpact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a\nmalformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or\nNULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service.\n\nThe functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2()\naccess the signing cert attribute value without validating its type.\nWhen the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory\nthrough the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash.\n\nExploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed\nTimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The\nTimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the\nexploit is just a Denial of Service. For these reasons the issue was\nassessed as Low severity.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue,\nas the TimeStamp Response implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module\nboundary.\n\nOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.\n\nOpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "format": "other",
          "other": {
            "content": {
              "text": "Low"
            },
            "type": "https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-754",
              "description": "CWE-754 Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-01-27T16:01:25.643Z",
        "orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
        "shortName": "openssl"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txt"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.6.1 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a99349ebfc519999edc50620abe24d599b9eb085"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.5.5 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/564fd9c73787f25693bf9e75faf7bf6bb1305d4e"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.4.4 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/27c7012c91cc986a598d7540f3079dfde2416eb9"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.3.6 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5eb0770ffcf11b785cf374ff3c19196245e54f1b"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.0.19 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4e254b48ad93cc092be3dd62d97015f33f73133a"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Missing ASN1_TYPE validation in TS_RESP_verify_response() function",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
    "assignerShortName": "openssl",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-69420",
    "datePublished": "2026-01-27T16:01:25.643Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-06T12:44:09.945Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-01-28T19:33:41.253Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-69420\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-01-28T19:33:06.662569Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-28T19:33:23.915Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Missing ASN1_TYPE validation in TS_RESP_verify_response() function\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"reporter\", \"value\": \"Luigino Camastra (Aisle Research)\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation developer\", \"value\": \"Bob Beck\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/\", \"content\": {\"text\": \"Low\"}}, \"format\": \"other\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"OpenSSL\", \"product\": \"OpenSSL\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.6.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.6.1\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.5.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.5.5\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.4.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.4.4\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.3.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.3.6\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.0.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.0.19\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"1.1.1\", \"lessThan\": \"1.1.1ze\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2026-01-27T14:00:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txt\", \"name\": \"OpenSSL Advisory\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a99349ebfc519999edc50620abe24d599b9eb085\", \"name\": \"3.6.1 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/564fd9c73787f25693bf9e75faf7bf6bb1305d4e\", \"name\": \"3.5.5 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/27c7012c91cc986a598d7540f3079dfde2416eb9\", \"name\": \"3.4.4 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5eb0770ffcf11b785cf374ff3c19196245e54f1b\", \"name\": \"3.3.6 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4e254b48ad93cc092be3dd62d97015f33f73133a\", \"name\": \"3.0.19 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response\\nverification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first\\nvalidating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when\\nprocessing a malformed TimeStamp Response file.\\n\\nImpact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a\\nmalformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or\\nNULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service.\\n\\nThe functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2()\\naccess the signing cert attribute value without validating its type.\\nWhen the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory\\nthrough the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash.\\n\\nExploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed\\nTimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The\\nTimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the\\nexploit is just a Denial of Service. For these reasons the issue was\\nassessed as Low severity.\\n\\nThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue,\\nas the TimeStamp Response implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module\\nboundary.\\n\\nOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.\\n\\nOpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response\u003cbr\u003everification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first\u003cbr\u003evalidating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when\u003cbr\u003eprocessing a malformed TimeStamp Response file.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a\u003cbr\u003emalformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or\u003cbr\u003eNULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2()\u003cbr\u003eaccess the signing cert attribute value without validating its type.\u003cbr\u003eWhen the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory\u003cbr\u003ethrough the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eExploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed\u003cbr\u003eTimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The\u003cbr\u003eTimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the\u003cbr\u003eexploit is just a Denial of Service. For these reasons the issue was\u003cbr\u003eassessed as Low severity.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue,\u003cbr\u003eas the TimeStamp Response implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module\u003cbr\u003eboundary.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-754\", \"description\": \"CWE-754 Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5\", \"shortName\": \"openssl\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-27T16:01:25.643Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-69420\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-28T19:33:41.253Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-01-06T12:44:09.945Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-01-27T16:01:25.643Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"openssl\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.