CVE-2025-69222 (GCVE-0-2025-69222)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2026-01-07 21:17
Modified
2026-01-07 21:34
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Summary
LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. Version 0.8.1-rc2 is prone to a server-side request forgery (SSRF)
vulnerability due to missing restrictions of the Actions feature in the default configuration. LibreChat enables users to configure agents with predefined instructions and actions that can interact with remote services via OpenAPI specifications, supporting various HTTP methods, parameters, and authentication methods including custom headers. By default, there are no restrictions on accessible services, which means agents can also access internal components like the RAG API included in the default Docker Compose setup. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1-rc2.
References
| URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| danny-avila | LibreChat |
Version: >= 0.8.1-rc2, 0.8.2-rc2 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-69222",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-01-07T21:33:50.883724Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-07T21:34:00.607Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "LibreChat",
"vendor": "danny-avila",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.8.1-rc2, 0.8.2-rc2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. Version 0.8.1-rc2 is prone to a server-side request forgery (SSRF)\nvulnerability due to missing restrictions of the Actions feature in the default configuration. LibreChat enables users to configure agents with predefined instructions and actions that can interact with remote services via OpenAPI specifications, supporting various HTTP methods, parameters, and authentication methods including custom headers. By default, there are no restrictions on accessible services, which means agents can also access internal components like the RAG API included in the default Docker Compose setup. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1-rc2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-07T21:17:17.590Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/security/advisories/GHSA-rgjq-4q58-m3q8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/security/advisories/GHSA-rgjq-4q58-m3q8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/commit/3b41e392ba5c0d603c1737d8582875e04eaa6e02",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/commit/3b41e392ba5c0d603c1737d8582875e04eaa6e02"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/releases/tag/v0.8.2-rc2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/releases/tag/v0.8.2-rc2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-rgjq-4q58-m3q8",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "LibreChat is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery due to missing restrictions"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-69222",
"datePublished": "2026-01-07T21:17:17.590Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-12-29T19:03:19.357Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-07T21:34:00.607Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-69222\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-01-07T21:33:50.883724Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-07T21:33:55.980Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"LibreChat is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery due to missing restrictions\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-rgjq-4q58-m3q8\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"CHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 9.1, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"danny-avila\", \"product\": \"LibreChat\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 0.8.1-rc2, 0.8.2-rc2\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/security/advisories/GHSA-rgjq-4q58-m3q8\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/security/advisories/GHSA-rgjq-4q58-m3q8\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/commit/3b41e392ba5c0d603c1737d8582875e04eaa6e02\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/commit/3b41e392ba5c0d603c1737d8582875e04eaa6e02\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/releases/tag/v0.8.2-rc2\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/releases/tag/v0.8.2-rc2\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. Version 0.8.1-rc2 is prone to a server-side request forgery (SSRF)\\nvulnerability due to missing restrictions of the Actions feature in the default configuration. LibreChat enables users to configure agents with predefined instructions and actions that can interact with remote services via OpenAPI specifications, supporting various HTTP methods, parameters, and authentication methods including custom headers. By default, there are no restrictions on accessible services, which means agents can also access internal components like the RAG API included in the default Docker Compose setup. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1-rc2.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-918\", \"description\": \"CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-07T21:17:17.590Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-69222\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-01-07T21:34:00.607Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-12-29T19:03:19.357Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-01-07T21:17:17.590Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…