CVE-2025-5922 (GCVE-0-2025-5922)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-07-29 16:54
Modified
2025-07-29 18:27
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Access to TSplus Remote Access Admin Tool is restricted to administrators (unless "Disable UAC" option is enabled) and requires a PIN code. In versions below v18.40.6.17 the PIN's hash is stored in a system registry accessible to regular users, making it possible to perform a brute-force attack using rainbow tables, since the hash is not salted.
LTS (Long-Term Support) versions also received patches in v17.2025.6.27 and v16.2025.6.27 releases.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSplus | TSplus Remote Access |
Version: 0 < v18.40.6.17 Version: 0 < v17.2025.6.27 Version: 0 < v16.2025.6.27 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-5922",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-29T18:09:49.942871Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-29T18:27:35.763Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"AdminTool"
],
"platforms": [
"Windows"
],
"product": "TSplus Remote Access",
"vendor": "TSplus",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "v18.40.6.17",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "v17.2025.6.27",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "v16.2025.6.27",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Micha\u0142 Walkowski, PhD"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-07-29T16:54:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Access to TSplus Remote Access Admin Tool\u0026nbsp;is restricted to administrators (unless \"Disable UAC\" option is enabled) and requires a PIN code. In versions\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003ebelow\u0026nbsp;v18.40.6.17\u0026nbsp;t\u003c/span\u003ehe PIN\u0027s hash is stored in a system registry accessible to regular users, making it possible to perform a brute-force attack using rainbow tables, since the hash is not salted.\u003cbr\u003eLTS (Long-Term Support) versions also received patches in\u0026nbsp;v17.2025.6.27 and\u0026nbsp;v16.2025.6.27 releases."
}
],
"value": "Access to TSplus Remote Access Admin Tool\u00a0is restricted to administrators (unless \"Disable UAC\" option is enabled) and requires a PIN code. In versions\u00a0below\u00a0v18.40.6.17\u00a0the PIN\u0027s hash is stored in a system registry accessible to regular users, making it possible to perform a brute-force attack using rainbow tables, since the hash is not salted.\nLTS (Long-Term Support) versions also received patches in\u00a0v17.2025.6.27 and\u00a0v16.2025.6.27 releases."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-49",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-49 Password Brute Forcing"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 4.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-522",
"description": "CWE-522 Insufficiently Protected Credentials",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-759",
"description": "CWE-759 Use of a One-Way Hash without a Salt",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-29T16:54:43.730Z",
"orgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"shortName": "CERT-PL"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert.pl/en/posts/2025/07/CVE-2025-5922"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Retrievable password hash protecting TSplus admin console",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"assignerShortName": "CERT-PL",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-5922",
"datePublished": "2025-07-29T16:54:43.730Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-06-09T14:00:25.264Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-29T18:27:35.763Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-5922\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-07-29T18:09:49.942871Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-29T18:27:29.861Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Retrievable password hash protecting TSplus admin console\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Micha\\u0142 Walkowski, PhD\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-49\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-49 Password Brute Forcing\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"Recovery\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"baseScore\": 4.8, \"Automatable\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"attackVector\": \"LOCAL\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"TSplus\", \"modules\": [\"AdminTool\"], \"product\": \"TSplus Remote Access\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"v18.40.6.17\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"v17.2025.6.27\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"v16.2025.6.27\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"platforms\": [\"Windows\"], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2025-07-29T16:54:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://cert.pl/en/posts/2025/07/CVE-2025-5922\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Access to TSplus Remote Access Admin Tool\\u00a0is restricted to administrators (unless \\\"Disable UAC\\\" option is enabled) and requires a PIN code. In versions\\u00a0below\\u00a0v18.40.6.17\\u00a0the PIN\u0027s hash is stored in a system registry accessible to regular users, making it possible to perform a brute-force attack using rainbow tables, since the hash is not salted.\\nLTS (Long-Term Support) versions also received patches in\\u00a0v17.2025.6.27 and\\u00a0v16.2025.6.27 releases.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"Access to TSplus Remote Access Admin Tool\u0026nbsp;is restricted to administrators (unless \\\"Disable UAC\\\" option is enabled) and requires a PIN code. In versions\u003cspan style=\\\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\\\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\\\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\\\"\u003ebelow\u0026nbsp;v18.40.6.17\u0026nbsp;t\u003c/span\u003ehe PIN\u0027s hash is stored in a system registry accessible to regular users, making it possible to perform a brute-force attack using rainbow tables, since the hash is not salted.\u003cbr\u003eLTS (Long-Term Support) versions also received patches in\u0026nbsp;v17.2025.6.27 and\u0026nbsp;v16.2025.6.27 releases.\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-522\", \"description\": \"CWE-522 Insufficiently Protected Credentials\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-759\", \"description\": \"CWE-759 Use of a One-Way Hash without a Salt\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6\", \"shortName\": \"CERT-PL\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-29T16:54:43.730Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-5922\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-29T18:27:35.763Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-06-09T14:00:25.264Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-07-29T16:54:43.730Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"CERT-PL\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…