CVE-2025-52884 (GCVE-0-2025-52884)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-06-24 20:20
Modified
2025-06-24 20:49
CWE
  • CWE-159 - Improper Handling of Invalid Use of Special Elements
Summary
RISC Zero is a zero-knowledge verifiable general computing platform, with Ethereum integration. The risc0-ethereum repository contains Solidity verifier contracts, Steel EVM view call library, and supporting code. Prior to versions 2.1.1 and 2.2.0, the `Steel.validateCommitment` Solidity library function will return `true` for a crafted commitment with a digest value of zero. This violates the semantics of `validateCommitment`, as this does not commitment to a block that is in the current chain. Because the digest is zero, it does not correspond to any block and there exist no known openings. As a result, this commitment will never be produced by a correct zkVM guest using Steel and leveraging this bug to compromise the soundness of a program using Steel would require a separate bug or misuse of the Steel library, which is expected to be used to validate the root of state opening proofs. A fix has been released as part of `risc0-ethereum` 2.1.1 and 2.2.0. Users for the `Steel` Solidity library versions 2.1.0 or earlier should ensure they are using `Steel.validateCommitment` in tandem with zkVM proof verification of a Steel program, as shown in the ERC-20 counter example, and documentation. This is the correct usage of Steel, and users following this pattern are not at risk, and do not need to take action. Users not verifying a zkVM proof of a Steel program should update their application to do so, as this is incorrect usage of Steel.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
risc0 risc0-ethereum Version: < 2.1.1
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-52884",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-06-24T20:49:01.025065Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-06-24T20:49:13.684Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "risc0-ethereum",
          "vendor": "risc0",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 2.1.1"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "RISC Zero is a zero-knowledge verifiable general computing platform, with Ethereum integration. The risc0-ethereum repository contains Solidity verifier contracts, Steel EVM view call library, and supporting code. Prior to versions 2.1.1 and 2.2.0, the `Steel.validateCommitment` Solidity library function will return `true` for a crafted commitment with a digest value of zero. This violates the semantics of `validateCommitment`, as this does not commitment to a block that is in the current chain. Because the digest is zero, it does not correspond to any block and there exist no known openings. As a result, this commitment will never be produced by a correct zkVM guest using Steel and leveraging this bug to compromise the soundness of a program using Steel would require a separate bug or misuse of the Steel library, which is expected to be used to validate the root of state opening proofs. A fix has been released as part of `risc0-ethereum` 2.1.1 and 2.2.0. Users for the `Steel` Solidity library versions 2.1.0 or earlier should ensure they are using `Steel.validateCommitment` in tandem with zkVM proof verification of a Steel program, as shown in the ERC-20 counter example, and documentation. This is the correct usage of Steel, and users following this pattern are not at risk, and do not need to take action. Users not verifying a zkVM proof of a Steel program should update their application to do so, as this is incorrect usage of Steel."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 1.7,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-159",
              "description": "CWE-159: Improper Handling of Invalid Use of Special Elements",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-06-24T20:20:17.287Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/security/advisories/GHSA-gjv3-89hh-9xq2",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/security/advisories/GHSA-gjv3-89hh-9xq2"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/pull/605",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/pull/605"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/commit/3bbac859c7132b21ba5fdf2d47f1dd52e7e73d98",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/commit/3bbac859c7132b21ba5fdf2d47f1dd52e7e73d98"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://docs.beboundless.xyz/developers/steel/how-it-works#verifying-the-proof-onchain",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://docs.beboundless.xyz/developers/steel/how-it-works#verifying-the-proof-onchain"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/blob/ff0cb9253a87945b653b825711b8b5075f8b7545/examples/erc20-counter/contracts/src/Counter.sol#L56-L63",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/blob/ff0cb9253a87945b653b825711b8b5075f8b7545/examples/erc20-counter/contracts/src/Counter.sol#L56-L63"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/releases/tag/v2.1.1",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/releases/tag/v2.1.1"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/releases/tag/v2.2.0",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/releases/tag/v2.2.0"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-gjv3-89hh-9xq2",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "risc0-ethereum-contracts allows invalid commitment with digest value of zero to be accepted by Steel.validateCommitment"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-52884",
    "datePublished": "2025-06-24T20:20:17.287Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-06-20T17:42:25.708Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-06-24T20:49:13.684Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-52884\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-06-24T20:49:01.025065Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-06-24T20:49:08.398Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"risc0-ethereum-contracts allows invalid commitment with digest value of zero to be accepted by Steel.validateCommitment\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-gjv3-89hh-9xq2\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 1.7, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"LOW\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackRequirements\": \"PRESENT\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"risc0\", \"product\": \"risc0-ethereum\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 2.1.1\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/security/advisories/GHSA-gjv3-89hh-9xq2\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/security/advisories/GHSA-gjv3-89hh-9xq2\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/pull/605\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/pull/605\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/commit/3bbac859c7132b21ba5fdf2d47f1dd52e7e73d98\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/commit/3bbac859c7132b21ba5fdf2d47f1dd52e7e73d98\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://docs.beboundless.xyz/developers/steel/how-it-works#verifying-the-proof-onchain\", \"name\": \"https://docs.beboundless.xyz/developers/steel/how-it-works#verifying-the-proof-onchain\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/blob/ff0cb9253a87945b653b825711b8b5075f8b7545/examples/erc20-counter/contracts/src/Counter.sol#L56-L63\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/blob/ff0cb9253a87945b653b825711b8b5075f8b7545/examples/erc20-counter/contracts/src/Counter.sol#L56-L63\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/releases/tag/v2.1.1\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/releases/tag/v2.1.1\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/releases/tag/v2.2.0\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/releases/tag/v2.2.0\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"RISC Zero is a zero-knowledge verifiable general computing platform, with Ethereum integration. The risc0-ethereum repository contains Solidity verifier contracts, Steel EVM view call library, and supporting code. Prior to versions 2.1.1 and 2.2.0, the `Steel.validateCommitment` Solidity library function will return `true` for a crafted commitment with a digest value of zero. This violates the semantics of `validateCommitment`, as this does not commitment to a block that is in the current chain. Because the digest is zero, it does not correspond to any block and there exist no known openings. As a result, this commitment will never be produced by a correct zkVM guest using Steel and leveraging this bug to compromise the soundness of a program using Steel would require a separate bug or misuse of the Steel library, which is expected to be used to validate the root of state opening proofs. A fix has been released as part of `risc0-ethereum` 2.1.1 and 2.2.0. Users for the `Steel` Solidity library versions 2.1.0 or earlier should ensure they are using `Steel.validateCommitment` in tandem with zkVM proof verification of a Steel program, as shown in the ERC-20 counter example, and documentation. This is the correct usage of Steel, and users following this pattern are not at risk, and do not need to take action. Users not verifying a zkVM proof of a Steel program should update their application to do so, as this is incorrect usage of Steel.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-159\", \"description\": \"CWE-159: Improper Handling of Invalid Use of Special Elements\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-06-24T20:20:17.287Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-52884\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-06-24T20:49:13.684Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-06-20T17:42:25.708Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-06-24T20:20:17.287Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…