CVE-2025-1713 (GCVE-0-2025-1713)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-07-17 13:59
Modified
2025-07-17 14:21
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
When setting up interrupt remapping for legacy PCI(-X) devices,
including PCI(-X) bridges, a lookup of the upstream bridge is required.
This lookup, itself involving acquiring of a lock, is done in a context
where acquiring that lock is unsafe. This can lead to a deadlock.
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-17T14:04:25.770Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/1"
},
{
"url": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-467.html"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/27/3"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/28/1"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-1713",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-17T14:17:20.052947Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-833",
"description": "CWE-833 Deadlock",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-17T14:21:42.020Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Xen",
"vendor": "Xen",
"versions": [
{
"status": "unknown",
"version": "consult Xen advisory XSA-467"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Xen versions 4.0 and later are affected. Xen versions 3.4 and earlier\nare not directly affected, but had other issues.\n\nSystems with Intel IOMMU hardware (VT-d) are affected. Systems using\nAMD or non-x86 hardware are not affected.\n\nOnly systems where certain kinds of devices are passed through to an\nunprivileged guest are vulnerable."
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-02-27T12:52:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "When setting up interrupt remapping for legacy PCI(-X) devices,\nincluding PCI(-X) bridges, a lookup of the upstream bridge is required.\nThis lookup, itself involving acquiring of a lock, is done in a context\nwhere acquiring that lock is unsafe. This can lead to a deadlock."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The passing through of certain kinds of devices to an unprivileged guest\ncan result in a Denial of Service (DoS) affecting the entire host.\n\nNote: Normal usage of such devices by a privileged domain can also\n trigger the issue. In such a scenario, the deadlock is not\n considered a security issue, but just a plain bug."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-17T13:59:46.231Z",
"orgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
"shortName": "XEN"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-467.html"
}
],
"title": "deadlock potential with VT-d and legacy PCI device pass-through",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Avoiding the passing through of the affected device types will avoid\nthe vulnerability."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
"assignerShortName": "XEN",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-1713",
"datePublished": "2025-07-17T13:59:46.231Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-02-26T09:04:42.837Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-17T14:21:42.020Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…