CVE-2024-53846 (GCVE-0-2024-53846)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-12-05 17:02
Modified
2024-12-06 16:26
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Summary
OTP is a set of Erlang libraries, which consists of the Erlang runtime system, a number of ready-to-use components mainly written in Erlang, and a set of design principles for Erlang programs. A regression was introduced into the ssl application of OTP starting at OTP-25.3.2.8, OTP-26.2, and OTP-27.0, resulting in a server or client verifying the peer when incorrect extended key usage is presented (i.e., a server will verify a client if they have server auth ext key usage and vice versa).
References
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:erlang:otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "otp",
"vendor": "erlang",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "25.3.2.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-53846",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-12-06T16:04:29.566469Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-06T16:26:57.528Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "otp",
"vendor": "erlang",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 25.3.2.8, \u003c= 25.3.2.16"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 26.2, \u003c= 26.2.5.6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 27.0, \u003c= 27.1.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OTP is a set of Erlang libraries, which consists of the Erlang runtime system, a number of ready-to-use components mainly written in Erlang, and a set of design principles for Erlang programs. A regression was introduced into the ssl application of OTP starting at OTP-25.3.2.8, OTP-26.2, and OTP-27.0, resulting in a server or client verifying the peer when incorrect extended key usage is presented (i.e., a server will verify a client if they have server auth ext key usage and vice versa)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-05T17:02:59.370Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-qw6r-qh9v-638v",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-qw6r-qh9v-638v"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-qw6r-qh9v-638v",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "ssl fails to validate incorrect extened key usage"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-53846",
"datePublished": "2024-12-05T17:02:59.370Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-11-22T17:30:02.140Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-06T16:26:57.528Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…