CVE-2024-43661 (GCVE-0-2024-43661)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-01-09 07:56
Modified
2025-03-11 13:07
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-121 - Exploit Non-Production Interfaces
Summary
The <redacted>.so library, which is used by <redacted>, is
vulnerable to a buffer overflow in the code that handles the deletion
of certificates. This buffer overflow can be triggered by providing a
long file path to the <redacted> action of the <redacted>.exe CGI binary or
to the <redacted>.sh CGI script. This binary or script will write this
file path to <redacted>, which is then
read by <redacted>.so
This issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC models before version 24120701.
Likelihood: Moderate – An attacker will have to find this exploit by
either obtaining the binaries involved in this vulnerability, or by trial
and error. Furthermore, the attacker will need a (low privilege)
account to gain access to the <redacted>.exe CGI binary or <redacted>.sh
script to trigger the vulnerability, or convince a user with such access
send an HTTP request that triggers it.
Impact: High – The <redacted> process, which we assume is
responsible for OCPP communication, will keep crashing after
performing the exploit. This happens because the buffer overflow
causes the process to segfault before
<redacted> is removed. This means that,
even though <redacted> is automatically restarted, it will crash
again as soon as it tries to parse the text file.
CVSS clarification. The attack can be executed over any network connection the station is listening to and serves the web interface (AV:N), and there are no additional security measure sin place that need to be circumvented (AC:L), the attack does not rely on preconditions (AT:N). The attack does require authentication, but the level of authentication is irrelevant (PR:L), it does not require user interaction (UI:N). The attack leads to reducred availability of the device (VC:N/VI:N/VA:H). THere is not impact on subsequent systems. (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). Alltough this device is an EV charger handing significant amounts of power, we do not forsee a safety impact. The attack can be automated (AU:Y). Because the DoS condition is written to disk persistantly, it cannot be recovered by the user (R:I).
References
| ► | URL | Tags | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iocharger | Iocharger firmware for AC models |
Version: 0 < 24120701 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-43661",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-01-09T14:40:55.906992Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-09T14:41:21.642Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Iocharger firmware for AC models",
"vendor": "Iocharger",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "24120701",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Wilco van Beijnum"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "analyst",
"value": "Harm van den Brink (DIVD)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "analyst",
"value": "Frank Breedijk (DIVD)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-01-09T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "The \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt;.so library, which is used by \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt;, is\nvulnerable to a buffer overflow in the code that handles the deletion\nof certificates. This buffer overflow can be triggered by providing a\nlong file path to the \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt; action of the \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt;.exe CGI binary or\nto the \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt;.sh CGI script. This binary or script will write this\nfile path to \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt;, which is then\nread by \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt;.so\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC models before version 24120701.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eLikelihood: Moderate \u2013 An attacker will have to find this exploit by\neither obtaining the binaries involved in this vulnerability, or by trial\nand error. Furthermore, the attacker will need a (low privilege)\naccount to gain access to the \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt;.exe CGI binary or \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt;.sh\nscript to trigger the vulnerability, or convince a user with such access\nsend an HTTP request that triggers it.\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact: High \u2013 The \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt; process, which we assume is\nresponsible for OCPP communication, will keep crashing after\nperforming the exploit. This happens because the buffer overflow\ncauses the process to segfault before\n\u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt; is removed. This means that,\neven though \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt; is automatically restarted, it will crash\nagain as soon as it tries to parse the text file.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eCVSS clarification. The attack can be executed over any network connection the station is listening to and serves the web interface (AV:N), and there are no additional security measure sin place that need to be circumvented (AC:L), the attack does not rely on preconditions (AT:N). The attack does require authentication, but the level of authentication is irrelevant (PR:L), it does not require user interaction (UI:N). The attack leads to reducred availability of the device (VC:N/VI:N/VA:H). THere is not impact on subsequent systems. (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). Alltough this device is an EV charger handing significant amounts of power, we do not forsee a safety impact. The attack can be automated (AU:Y). Because the DoS condition is written to disk persistantly, it cannot be recovered by the user (R:I).\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The \u003credacted\u003e.so library, which is used by \u003credacted\u003e, is\nvulnerable to a buffer overflow in the code that handles the deletion\nof certificates. This buffer overflow can be triggered by providing a\nlong file path to the \u003credacted\u003e action of the \u003credacted\u003e.exe CGI binary or\nto the \u003credacted\u003e.sh CGI script. This binary or script will write this\nfile path to \u003credacted\u003e, which is then\nread by \u003credacted\u003e.so\n\n\nThis issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC models before version 24120701.\n\nLikelihood: Moderate \u2013 An attacker will have to find this exploit by\neither obtaining the binaries involved in this vulnerability, or by trial\nand error. Furthermore, the attacker will need a (low privilege)\naccount to gain access to the \u003credacted\u003e.exe CGI binary or \u003credacted\u003e.sh\nscript to trigger the vulnerability, or convince a user with such access\nsend an HTTP request that triggers it.\n\n\nImpact: High \u2013 The \u003credacted\u003e process, which we assume is\nresponsible for OCPP communication, will keep crashing after\nperforming the exploit. This happens because the buffer overflow\ncauses the process to segfault before\n\u003credacted\u003e is removed. This means that,\neven though \u003credacted\u003e is automatically restarted, it will crash\nagain as soon as it tries to parse the text file.\n\nCVSS clarification. The attack can be executed over any network connection the station is listening to and serves the web interface (AV:N), and there are no additional security measure sin place that need to be circumvented (AC:L), the attack does not rely on preconditions (AT:N). The attack does require authentication, but the level of authentication is irrelevant (PR:L), it does not require user interaction (UI:N). The attack leads to reducred availability of the device (VC:N/VI:N/VA:H). THere is not impact on subsequent systems. (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). Alltough this device is an EV charger handing significant amounts of power, we do not forsee a safety impact. The attack can be automated (AU:Y). Because the DoS condition is written to disk persistantly, it cannot be recovered by the user (R:I)."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-607",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-607 Obstruction"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "YES",
"Recovery": "IRRECOVERABLE",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/AU:Y/R:I",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-121",
"description": "CWE-121 Exploit Non-Production Interfaces",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-11T13:07:04.504Z",
"orgId": "b87402ff-ae37-4194-9dae-31abdbd6f217",
"shortName": "DIVD"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://csirt.divd.nl/DIVD-2024-00035/"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://csirt.divd.nl/CVE-2024-43661/"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://iocharger.com"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "DIVD-2024-00035",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Buffer overflow in \u003credacted\u003e.so leads to DoS of OCPP service",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b87402ff-ae37-4194-9dae-31abdbd6f217",
"assignerShortName": "DIVD",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-43661",
"datePublished": "2025-01-09T07:56:46.514Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-08-14T09:27:41.769Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-11T13:07:04.504Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 9.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-43661\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-01-09T14:40:55.906992Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-09T14:41:16.492Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Buffer overflow in \u003credacted\u003e.so leads to DoS of OCPP service\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"DIVD-2024-00035\", \"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Wilco van Beijnum\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"analyst\", \"value\": \"Harm van den Brink (DIVD)\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"analyst\", \"value\": \"Frank Breedijk (DIVD)\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-607\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-607 Obstruction\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"Recovery\": \"IRRECOVERABLE\", \"baseScore\": 7.1, \"Automatable\": \"YES\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/AU:Y/R:I\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Iocharger\", \"product\": \"Iocharger firmware for AC models\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"24120701\", \"versionType\": \"custom\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2025-01-09T00:00:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://csirt.divd.nl/DIVD-2024-00035/\", \"tags\": [\"third-party-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://csirt.divd.nl/CVE-2024-43661/\", \"tags\": [\"third-party-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://iocharger.com\", \"tags\": [\"product\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The \u003credacted\u003e.so library, which is used by \u003credacted\u003e, is\\nvulnerable to a buffer overflow in the code that handles the deletion\\nof certificates. This buffer overflow can be triggered by providing a\\nlong file path to the \u003credacted\u003e action of the \u003credacted\u003e.exe CGI binary or\\nto the \u003credacted\u003e.sh CGI script. This binary or script will write this\\nfile path to \u003credacted\u003e, which is then\\nread by \u003credacted\u003e.so\\n\\n\\nThis issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC models before version 24120701.\\n\\nLikelihood: Moderate \\u2013 An attacker will have to find this exploit by\\neither obtaining the binaries involved in this vulnerability, or by trial\\nand error. Furthermore, the attacker will need a (low privilege)\\naccount to gain access to the \u003credacted\u003e.exe CGI binary or \u003credacted\u003e.sh\\nscript to trigger the vulnerability, or convince a user with such access\\nsend an HTTP request that triggers it.\\n\\n\\nImpact: High \\u2013 The \u003credacted\u003e process, which we assume is\\nresponsible for OCPP communication, will keep crashing after\\nperforming the exploit. This happens because the buffer overflow\\ncauses the process to segfault before\\n\u003credacted\u003e is removed. This means that,\\neven though \u003credacted\u003e is automatically restarted, it will crash\\nagain as soon as it tries to parse the text file.\\n\\nCVSS clarification. The attack can be executed over any network connection the station is listening to and serves the web interface (AV:N), and there are no additional security measure sin place that need to be circumvented (AC:L), the attack does not rely on preconditions (AT:N). The attack does require authentication, but the level of authentication is irrelevant (PR:L), it does not require user interaction (UI:N). The attack leads to reducred availability of the device (VC:N/VI:N/VA:H). THere is not impact on subsequent systems. (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). Alltough this device is an EV charger handing significant amounts of power, we do not forsee a safety impact. The attack can be automated (AU:Y). Because the DoS condition is written to disk persistantly, it cannot be recovered by the user (R:I).\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"The \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt;.so library, which is used by \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt;, is\\nvulnerable to a buffer overflow in the code that handles the deletion\\nof certificates. This buffer overflow can be triggered by providing a\\nlong file path to the \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt; action of the \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt;.exe CGI binary or\\nto the \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt;.sh CGI script. This binary or script will write this\\nfile path to \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt;, which is then\\nread by \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt;.so\\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC models before version 24120701.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eLikelihood: Moderate \\u2013 An attacker will have to find this exploit by\\neither obtaining the binaries involved in this vulnerability, or by trial\\nand error. Furthermore, the attacker will need a (low privilege)\\naccount to gain access to the \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt;.exe CGI binary or \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt;.sh\\nscript to trigger the vulnerability, or convince a user with such access\\nsend an HTTP request that triggers it.\\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact: High \\u2013 The \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt; process, which we assume is\\nresponsible for OCPP communication, will keep crashing after\\nperforming the exploit. This happens because the buffer overflow\\ncauses the process to segfault before\\n\u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt; is removed. This means that,\\neven though \u0026lt;redacted\u0026gt; is automatically restarted, it will crash\\nagain as soon as it tries to parse the text file.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eCVSS clarification. The attack can be executed over any network connection the station is listening to and serves the web interface (AV:N), and there are no additional security measure sin place that need to be circumvented (AC:L), the attack does not rely on preconditions (AT:N). The attack does require authentication, but the level of authentication is irrelevant (PR:L), it does not require user interaction (UI:N). The attack leads to reducred availability of the device (VC:N/VI:N/VA:H). THere is not impact on subsequent systems. (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). Alltough this device is an EV charger handing significant amounts of power, we do not forsee a safety impact. The attack can be automated (AU:Y). Because the DoS condition is written to disk persistantly, it cannot be recovered by the user (R:I).\u003cbr\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-121\", \"description\": \"CWE-121 Exploit Non-Production Interfaces\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"b87402ff-ae37-4194-9dae-31abdbd6f217\", \"shortName\": \"DIVD\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-03-11T13:07:04.504Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-43661\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-03-11T13:07:04.504Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-08-14T09:27:41.769Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"b87402ff-ae37-4194-9dae-31abdbd6f217\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-01-09T07:56:46.514Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"DIVD\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…