CVE-2024-21491 (GCVE-0-2024-21491)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-02-13 05:00 – Updated: 2025-05-09 18:25
VLAI
Summary
Versions of the package svix before 1.17.0 are vulnerable to Authentication Bypass due to an issue in the verify function where signatures of different lengths are incorrectly compared. An attacker can bypass signature verification by providing a shorter signature that matches the beginning of the actual signature. **Note:** The attacker would need to know a victim uses the Rust library for verification,no easy way to automatically check that; and uses webhooks by a service that uses Svix, and then figure out a way to craft a malicious payload that will actually include all of the correct identifiers needed to trick the receivers to cause actual issues.
SSVC
Exploitation: poc Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2024-02-21 20:12 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-288 - Authentication Bypass
  • CWE-288 - Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel
Assigner
snyk CNA
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
n/a svix Affected: 0 , < 1.17.0 (semver)
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T22:20:40.878Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUST-SVIX-6230729"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/pull/1190"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/commit/958821bd3b956d1436af65f70a0964d4ffb7daf6"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2024-0010.html"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      },
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-21491",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-02-21T20:12:36.693619Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-288",
                "description": "CWE-288 Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-05-09T18:25:35.884Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "svix",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "1.17.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Fredrik Meringdal"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Versions of the package svix before 1.17.0 are vulnerable to Authentication Bypass due to an issue in the verify function where signatures of different lengths are incorrectly compared. An attacker can bypass signature verification by providing a shorter signature that matches the beginning of the actual signature.\r\r**Note:**\r\rThe attacker would need to know a victim uses the Rust library for verification,no easy way to automatically check that; and uses webhooks by a service that uses Svix, and then figure out a way to craft a malicious payload that will actually include all of the correct identifiers needed to trick the receivers to cause actual issues."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 5.9,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-288",
              "description": "Authentication Bypass",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-03-06T14:09:36.126Z",
        "orgId": "bae035ff-b466-4ff4-94d0-fc9efd9e1730",
        "shortName": "snyk"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUST-SVIX-6230729"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/pull/1190"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/commit/958821bd3b956d1436af65f70a0964d4ffb7daf6"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2024-0010.html"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "bae035ff-b466-4ff4-94d0-fc9efd9e1730",
    "assignerShortName": "snyk",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-21491",
    "datePublished": "2024-02-13T05:00:02.196Z",
    "dateReserved": "2023-12-22T12:33:20.118Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-05-09T18:25:35.884Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": {
        "adp": [
          {
            "providerMetadata": {
              "dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T22:20:40.878Z",
              "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
              "shortName": "CVE"
            },
            "references": [
              {
                "tags": [
                  "x_transferred"
                ],
                "url": "https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUST-SVIX-6230729"
              },
              {
                "tags": [
                  "x_transferred"
                ],
                "url": "https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/pull/1190"
              },
              {
                "tags": [
                  "x_transferred"
                ],
                "url": "https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/commit/958821bd3b956d1436af65f70a0964d4ffb7daf6"
              },
              {
                "tags": [
                  "x_transferred"
                ],
                "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2024-0010.html"
              }
            ],
            "title": "CVE Program Container"
          },
          {
            "metrics": [
              {
                "other": {
                  "content": {
                    "id": "CVE-2024-21491",
                    "options": [
                      {
                        "Exploitation": "poc"
                      },
                      {
                        "Automatable": "no"
                      },
                      {
                        "Technical Impact": "partial"
                      }
                    ],
                    "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                    "timestamp": "2024-02-21T20:12:36.693619Z",
                    "version": "2.0.3"
                  },
                  "type": "ssvc"
                }
              }
            ],
            "problemTypes": [
              {
                "descriptions": [
                  {
                    "cweId": "CWE-288",
                    "description": "CWE-288 Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel",
                    "lang": "en",
                    "type": "CWE"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "providerMetadata": {
              "dateUpdated": "2025-05-09T18:25:30.919Z",
              "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
            },
            "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
          }
        ],
        "cna": {
          "affected": [
            {
              "product": "svix",
              "vendor": "n/a",
              "versions": [
                {
                  "lessThan": "1.17.0",
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "0",
                  "versionType": "semver"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "credits": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Fredrik Meringdal"
            }
          ],
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Versions of the package svix before 1.17.0 are vulnerable to Authentication Bypass due to an issue in the verify function where signatures of different lengths are incorrectly compared. An attacker can bypass signature verification by providing a shorter signature that matches the beginning of the actual signature.\r\r**Note:**\r\rThe attacker would need to know a victim uses the Rust library for verification,no easy way to automatically check that; and uses webhooks by a service that uses Svix, and then figure out a way to craft a malicious payload that will actually include all of the correct identifiers needed to trick the receivers to cause actual issues."
            }
          ],
          "metrics": [
            {
              "cvssV3_1": {
                "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "baseScore": 5.9,
                "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
                "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
                "version": "3.1"
              }
            }
          ],
          "problemTypes": [
            {
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "cweId": "CWE-288",
                  "description": "Authentication Bypass",
                  "lang": "en"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "providerMetadata": {
            "dateUpdated": "2024-03-06T14:09:36.126Z",
            "orgId": "bae035ff-b466-4ff4-94d0-fc9efd9e1730",
            "shortName": "snyk"
          },
          "references": [
            {
              "url": "https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUST-SVIX-6230729"
            },
            {
              "url": "https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/pull/1190"
            },
            {
              "url": "https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/commit/958821bd3b956d1436af65f70a0964d4ffb7daf6"
            },
            {
              "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2024-0010.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "cveMetadata": {
        "assignerOrgId": "bae035ff-b466-4ff4-94d0-fc9efd9e1730",
        "assignerShortName": "snyk",
        "cveId": "CVE-2024-21491",
        "datePublished": "2024-02-13T05:00:02.196Z",
        "dateReserved": "2023-12-22T12:33:20.118Z",
        "dateUpdated": "2025-05-09T18:25:35.884Z",
        "state": "PUBLISHED"
      },
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.