CVE-2024-12802 (GCVE-0-2024-12802)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2025-01-09 09:08
Modified
2025-01-09 14:30
Severity ?
9.1 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CWE
  • CWE-305 - Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness
Summary
SSL-VPN MFA Bypass in SonicWALL SSL-VPN can arise in specific cases due to the separate handling of UPN (User Principal Name) and SAM (Security Account Manager) account names when integrated with Microsoft Active Directory, allowing MFA to be configured independently for each login method and potentially enabling attackers to bypass MFA by exploiting the alternative account name.
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
SonicWall SonicOS Version: 6.5.4.4-44v-21-2457 and older versions
Version: 6.5.4.15-117n and older versions
Version: 7.0.1-5161 and older versions
Version: 7.1.1-7058 and older versions
Version: 7.1.2-7019
Version: 8.0.0-8035
 Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 9.1,
              "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-12802",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-01-09T14:29:43.478423Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-01-09T14:30:34.676Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "platforms": [
            "Gen6 NSv",
            "Gen6 Hardware",
            "Gen7 Hardware",
            "Gen7 NSv",
            "TZ80"
          ],
          "product": "SonicOS",
          "vendor": "SonicWall",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.5.4.4-44v-21-2457 and older versions"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.5.4.15-117n and older versions"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.0.1-5161 and older versions"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.1.1-7058 and older versions"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.1.2-7019"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.0.0-8035"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2025-01-08T07:16:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eSSL-VPN MFA Bypass in SonicWALL SSL-VPN can arise in specific cases due to the separate handling of UPN (User Principal Name) and SAM (Security Account Manager) account names when integrated with Microsoft Active Directory, allowing MFA to be configured independently for each login method and potentially enabling attackers to bypass MFA by exploiting the alternative account name.\u003c/span\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "SSL-VPN MFA Bypass in SonicWALL SSL-VPN can arise in specific cases due to the separate handling of UPN (User Principal Name) and SAM (Security Account Manager) account names when integrated with Microsoft Active Directory, allowing MFA to be configured independently for each login method and potentially enabling attackers to bypass MFA by exploiting the alternative account name."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-305",
              "description": "CWE-305 Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-01-09T09:08:26.012Z",
        "orgId": "44b2ff79-1416-4492-88bb-ed0da00c7315",
        "shortName": "sonicwall"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2025-0001"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "SNWLID-2025-0001",
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "44b2ff79-1416-4492-88bb-ed0da00c7315",
    "assignerShortName": "sonicwall",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-12802",
    "datePublished": "2025-01-09T09:08:26.012Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-12-19T16:22:43.405Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-01-09T14:30:34.676Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 9.1, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-12802\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-01-09T14:29:43.478423Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-09T14:30:28.552Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"source\": {\"advisory\": \"SNWLID-2025-0001\", \"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"SonicWall\", \"product\": \"SonicOS\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"6.5.4.4-44v-21-2457 and older versions\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"6.5.4.15-117n and older versions\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"7.0.1-5161 and older versions\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"7.1.1-7058 and older versions\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"7.1.2-7019\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"8.0.0-8035\"}], \"platforms\": [\"Gen6 NSv\", \"Gen6 Hardware\", \"Gen7 Hardware\", \"Gen7 NSv\", \"TZ80\"], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2025-01-08T07:16:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2025-0001\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.2.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"SSL-VPN MFA Bypass in SonicWALL SSL-VPN can arise in specific cases due to the separate handling of UPN (User Principal Name) and SAM (Security Account Manager) account names when integrated with Microsoft Active Directory, allowing MFA to be configured independently for each login method and potentially enabling attackers to bypass MFA by exploiting the alternative account name.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cspan style=\\\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\\\"\u003eSSL-VPN MFA Bypass in SonicWALL SSL-VPN can arise in specific cases due to the separate handling of UPN (User Principal Name) and SAM (Security Account Manager) account names when integrated with Microsoft Active Directory, allowing MFA to be configured independently for each login method and potentially enabling attackers to bypass MFA by exploiting the alternative account name.\u003c/span\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-305\", \"description\": \"CWE-305 Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"44b2ff79-1416-4492-88bb-ed0da00c7315\", \"shortName\": \"sonicwall\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-09T09:08:26.012Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-12802\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-09T14:30:34.676Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-12-19T16:22:43.405Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"44b2ff79-1416-4492-88bb-ed0da00c7315\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-01-09T09:08:26.012Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"sonicwall\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.