CVE-2023-4263 (GCVE-0-2023-4263)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2023-10-13 20:42
Modified
2025-02-13 17:09
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-120 - Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
- CWE-121 - Stack-based Buffer Overflow A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Summary
Potential buffer overflow vulnerability in the Zephyr IEEE 802.15.4 nRF 15.4 driver
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| zephyrproject-rtos | Zephyr |
Version: 0 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T07:24:03.692Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-rf6q-rhhp-pqhf"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/11/07/1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Nov/1"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/175657/Zephyr-RTOS-3.x.0-Buffer-Overflows.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Zephyr",
"repo": "https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr",
"vendor": "zephyrproject-rtos",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "3.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Potential buffer overflow vulnerability in the Zephyr IEEE 802.15.4 nRF 15.4 driver"
}
],
"value": "Potential buffer overflow vulnerability in the Zephyr IEEE 802.15.4 nRF 15.4 driver"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-100",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-100 Overflow Buffers"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-120",
"description": "CWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-121",
"description": "CWE-121 Stack-based Buffer Overflow A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2023-11-14T03:06:28.258Z",
"orgId": "e2e69745-5e70-4e92-8431-deb5529a81ad",
"shortName": "zephyr"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-rf6q-rhhp-pqhf"
},
{
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/11/07/1"
},
{
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Nov/1"
},
{
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/175657/Zephyr-RTOS-3.x.0-Buffer-Overflows.html"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Potential buffer overflow vulnerability in the Zephyr IEEE 802.15.4 nRF 15.4 driver",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "e2e69745-5e70-4e92-8431-deb5529a81ad",
"assignerShortName": "zephyr",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-4263",
"datePublished": "2023-10-13T20:42:11.942Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-08-08T21:11:51.946Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-13T17:09:29.359Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…