CVE-2023-40303 (GCVE-0-2023-40303)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2023-08-14 00:00
Modified
2024-08-02 18:31
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- n/a
Summary
GNU inetutils before 2.5 may allow privilege escalation because of unchecked return values of set*id() family functions in ftpd, rcp, rlogin, rsh, rshd, and uucpd. This is, for example, relevant if the setuid system call fails when a process is trying to drop privileges before letting an ordinary user control the activities of the process.
References
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T18:31:53.432Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/inetutils.git/commit/?id=e4e65c03f4c11292a3e40ef72ca3f194c8bffdd6"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-inetutils/2023-07/msg00000.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/inetutils/"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20231008 [SECURITY] [DLA 3611-1] inetutils security update",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/10/msg00013.html"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20231230 Re: inetutils ftpd, rcp, rlogin, rsh, rshd, uucpd: Avoid potential privilege escalations by checking set*id() return values",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/30/4"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/10/msg00013.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GNU inetutils before 2.5 may allow privilege escalation because of unchecked return values of set*id() family functions in ftpd, rcp, rlogin, rsh, rshd, and uucpd. This is, for example, relevant if the setuid system call fails when a process is trying to drop privileges before letting an ordinary user control the activities of the process."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-01-02T00:16:47.588Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/inetutils.git/commit/?id=e4e65c03f4c11292a3e40ef72ca3f194c8bffdd6"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-inetutils/2023-07/msg00000.html"
},
{
"url": "https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/inetutils/"
},
{
"name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20231008 [SECURITY] [DLA 3611-1] inetutils security update",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/10/msg00013.html"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20231230 Re: inetutils ftpd, rcp, rlogin, rsh, rshd, uucpd: Avoid potential privilege escalations by checking set*id() return values",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/30/4"
},
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/10/msg00013.html"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-40303",
"datePublished": "2023-08-14T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-08-14T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T18:31:53.432Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…