CVE-2023-31421 (GCVE-0-2023-31421)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2023-10-26 03:10
Modified
2024-08-02 14:53
Severity ?
5.9 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CWE
  • CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Summary
It was discovered that when acting as TLS clients, Beats, Elastic Agent, APM Server, and Fleet Server did not verify whether the server certificate is valid for the target IP address; however, certificate signature validation is still performed. More specifically, when the client is configured to connect to an IP address (instead of a hostname) it does not validate the server certificate's IP SAN values against that IP address and certificate validation fails, and therefore the connection is not blocked as expected.
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Elastic Beats Version: 8.0.0, 8.9.2
 Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T14:53:30.714Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://discuss.elastic.co/t/beats-elastic-agent-apm-server-and-fleet-server-8-10-1-security-update-improper-certificate-validation-issue-esa-2023-16/343385"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.elastic.co/community/security"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Beats",
          "vendor": "Elastic",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.0.0, 8.9.2"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Elastic Agent",
          "vendor": "Elastic",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.0.0, 8.9.2"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "APM Server",
          "vendor": "Elastic",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.0.0, 8.9.2"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Fleet Server",
          "vendor": "Elastic",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.0.0, 8.9.2"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2023-09-19T15:32:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: var(--wht);\"\u003eIt was discovered that when acting as TLS clients, Beats, Elastic Agent, APM Server, and Fleet Server did not verify whether the server certificate is valid for the target IP address; however, certificate signature validation is still performed. More specifically, when the client is configured to connect to an IP address (instead of a hostname) it does not validate the server certificate\u0027s IP SAN values against that IP address and certificate validation fails, and therefore the connection is not blocked as expected.\u003c/span\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "It was discovered that when acting as TLS clients, Beats, Elastic Agent, APM Server, and Fleet Server did not verify whether the server certificate is valid for the target IP address; however, certificate signature validation is still performed. More specifically, when the client is configured to connect to an IP address (instead of a hostname) it does not validate the server certificate\u0027s IP SAN values against that IP address and certificate validation fails, and therefore the connection is not blocked as expected."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 5.9,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-295",
              "description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2023-10-26T03:10:52.684Z",
        "orgId": "271b6943-45a9-4f3a-ab4e-976f3fa05b5a",
        "shortName": "elastic"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://discuss.elastic.co/t/beats-elastic-agent-apm-server-and-fleet-server-8-10-1-security-update-improper-certificate-validation-issue-esa-2023-16/343385"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.elastic.co/community/security"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Beats, Elastic Agent, APM Server, and Fleet Server Improper Certificate Validation issue",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "271b6943-45a9-4f3a-ab4e-976f3fa05b5a",
    "assignerShortName": "elastic",
    "cveId": "CVE-2023-31421",
    "datePublished": "2023-10-26T03:10:52.684Z",
    "dateReserved": "2023-04-27T18:54:56.705Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T14:53:30.714Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.