CVE-2022-39354 (GCVE-0-2022-39354)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2022-10-25 00:00
Modified
2025-04-23 16:43
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-670 - Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
Summary
SputnikVM, also called evm, is a Rust implementation of Ethereum Virtual Machine. A custom stateful precompile can use the `is_static` parameter to determine if the call is executed in a static context (via `STATICCALL`), and thus decide if stateful operations should be done. Prior to version 0.36.0, the passed `is_static` parameter was incorrect -- it was only set to `true` if the call came from a direct `STATICCALL` opcode. However, once a static call context is entered, it should stay static. The issue only impacts custom precompiles that actually uses `is_static`. For those affected, the issue can lead to possible incorrect state transitions. Version 0.36.0 contains a patch. There are no known workarounds.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rust-blockchain | evm |
Version: < 0.36.0 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T12:00:44.050Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rust-blockchain/evm/security/advisories/GHSA-hhc4-47rh-cr34"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rust-blockchain/evm/pull/133"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-39354",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T13:55:44.553418Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T16:43:37.219Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "evm",
"vendor": "rust-blockchain",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.36.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "SputnikVM, also called evm, is a Rust implementation of Ethereum Virtual Machine. A custom stateful precompile can use the `is_static` parameter to determine if the call is executed in a static context (via `STATICCALL`), and thus decide if stateful operations should be done. Prior to version 0.36.0, the passed `is_static` parameter was incorrect -- it was only set to `true` if the call came from a direct `STATICCALL` opcode. However, once a static call context is entered, it should stay static. The issue only impacts custom precompiles that actually uses `is_static`. For those affected, the issue can lead to possible incorrect state transitions. Version 0.36.0 contains a patch. There are no known workarounds."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-670",
"description": "CWE-670: Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-10-25T00:00:00.000Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/rust-blockchain/evm/security/advisories/GHSA-hhc4-47rh-cr34"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/rust-blockchain/evm/pull/133"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-hhc4-47rh-cr34",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "evm has incorrect is_static parameter for custom stateful precompiles"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-39354",
"datePublished": "2022-10-25T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-09-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T16:43:37.219Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"cna\": {\"title\": \"evm has incorrect is_static parameter for custom stateful precompiles\", \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2022-10-25T00:00:00.000Z\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"SputnikVM, also called evm, is a Rust implementation of Ethereum Virtual Machine. A custom stateful precompile can use the `is_static` parameter to determine if the call is executed in a static context (via `STATICCALL`), and thus decide if stateful operations should be done. Prior to version 0.36.0, the passed `is_static` parameter was incorrect -- it was only set to `true` if the call came from a direct `STATICCALL` opcode. However, once a static call context is entered, it should stay static. The issue only impacts custom precompiles that actually uses `is_static`. For those affected, the issue can lead to possible incorrect state transitions. Version 0.36.0 contains a patch. There are no known workarounds.\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"rust-blockchain\", \"product\": \"evm\", \"versions\": [{\"version\": \"\u003c 0.36.0\", \"status\": \"affected\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/rust-blockchain/evm/security/advisories/GHSA-hhc4-47rh-cr34\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/rust-blockchain/evm/pull/133\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"baseScore\": 5.9, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\"}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"type\": \"CWE\", \"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"CWE-670: Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-670\"}]}], \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-hhc4-47rh-cr34\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}}, \"adp\": [{\"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-03T12:00:44.050Z\"}, \"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/rust-blockchain/evm/security/advisories/GHSA-hhc4-47rh-cr34\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/rust-blockchain/evm/pull/133\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}]}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2022-39354\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-04-23T13:55:44.553418Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-04-23T13:55:50.915Z\"}}]}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"cveId\": \"CVE-2022-39354\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-04-23T16:43:37.219Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2022-09-02T00:00:00.000Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2022-10-25T00:00:00.000Z\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…