CVE-2022-36008 (GCVE-0-2022-36008)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2022-08-19 20:25
Modified
2025-04-23 17:48
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- CWE-190 - Integer Overflow or Wraparound
Summary
Frontier is Substrate's Ethereum compatibility layer. A security issue was discovered affecting parsing of the RPC result of the exit reason in case of EVM reversion. In release build, this would cause the exit reason being incorrectly parsed and returned by RPC. In debug build, this would cause an overflow panic. No action is needed unless you have a bridge node that needs to distinguish different reversion exit reasons and you used RPC for this. There are currently no known workarounds.
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| paritytech | frontier |
Version: < commit fff8cc43b7756ce3979a38fc473f38e6e24ac451 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T09:51:59.842Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/security/advisories/GHSA-mjvm-mhgc-q4gp"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/pull/820"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/commit/fff8cc43b7756ce3979a38fc473f38e6e24ac451"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-36008",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T14:01:58.531083Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T17:48:19.789Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "frontier",
"vendor": "paritytech",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c commit fff8cc43b7756ce3979a38fc473f38e6e24ac451"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Frontier is Substrate\u0027s Ethereum compatibility layer. A security issue was discovered affecting parsing of the RPC result of the exit reason in case of EVM reversion. In release build, this would cause the exit reason being incorrectly parsed and returned by RPC. In debug build, this would cause an overflow panic. No action is needed unless you have a bridge node that needs to distinguish different reversion exit reasons and you used RPC for this. There are currently no known workarounds."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-190",
"description": "CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-08-19T20:25:10.000Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/security/advisories/GHSA-mjvm-mhgc-q4gp"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/pull/820"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/commit/fff8cc43b7756ce3979a38fc473f38e6e24ac451"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-mjvm-mhgc-q4gp",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Message length overflow in frontier",
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-36008",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Message length overflow in frontier"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "frontier",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "\u003c commit fff8cc43b7756ce3979a38fc473f38e6e24ac451"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "paritytech"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Frontier is Substrate\u0027s Ethereum compatibility layer. A security issue was discovered affecting parsing of the RPC result of the exit reason in case of EVM reversion. In release build, this would cause the exit reason being incorrectly parsed and returned by RPC. In debug build, this would cause an overflow panic. No action is needed unless you have a bridge node that needs to distinguish different reversion exit reasons and you used RPC for this. There are currently no known workarounds."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/security/advisories/GHSA-mjvm-mhgc-q4gp",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/security/advisories/GHSA-mjvm-mhgc-q4gp"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/pull/820",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/pull/820"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/commit/fff8cc43b7756ce3979a38fc473f38e6e24ac451",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/commit/fff8cc43b7756ce3979a38fc473f38e6e24ac451"
}
]
},
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-mjvm-mhgc-q4gp",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-36008",
"datePublished": "2022-08-19T20:25:10.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-07-15T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T17:48:19.789Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/security/advisories/GHSA-mjvm-mhgc-q4gp\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\", \"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/pull/820\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\", \"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/commit/fff8cc43b7756ce3979a38fc473f38e6e24ac451\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\", \"x_transferred\"]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-03T09:51:59.842Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2022-36008\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-04-23T14:01:58.531083Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-04-23T14:01:59.975Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Message length overflow in frontier\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-mjvm-mhgc-q4gp\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.1, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"paritytech\", \"product\": \"frontier\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c commit fff8cc43b7756ce3979a38fc473f38e6e24ac451\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/security/advisories/GHSA-mjvm-mhgc-q4gp\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/pull/820\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/commit/fff8cc43b7756ce3979a38fc473f38e6e24ac451\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Frontier is Substrate\u0027s Ethereum compatibility layer. A security issue was discovered affecting parsing of the RPC result of the exit reason in case of EVM reversion. In release build, this would cause the exit reason being incorrectly parsed and returned by RPC. In debug build, this would cause an overflow panic. No action is needed unless you have a bridge node that needs to distinguish different reversion exit reasons and you used RPC for this. There are currently no known workarounds.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-190\", \"description\": \"CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2022-08-19T20:25:10.000Z\"}, \"x_legacyV4Record\": {\"impact\": {\"cvss\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.1, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}, \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-mjvm-mhgc-q4gp\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"affects\": {\"vendor\": {\"vendor_data\": [{\"product\": {\"product_data\": [{\"version\": {\"version_data\": [{\"version_value\": \"\u003c commit fff8cc43b7756ce3979a38fc473f38e6e24ac451\"}]}, \"product_name\": \"frontier\"}]}, \"vendor_name\": \"paritytech\"}]}}, \"data_type\": \"CVE\", \"references\": {\"reference_data\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/security/advisories/GHSA-mjvm-mhgc-q4gp\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/security/advisories/GHSA-mjvm-mhgc-q4gp\", \"refsource\": \"CONFIRM\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/pull/820\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/pull/820\", \"refsource\": \"MISC\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/commit/fff8cc43b7756ce3979a38fc473f38e6e24ac451\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/commit/fff8cc43b7756ce3979a38fc473f38e6e24ac451\", \"refsource\": \"MISC\"}]}, \"data_format\": \"MITRE\", \"description\": {\"description_data\": [{\"lang\": \"eng\", \"value\": \"Frontier is Substrate\u0027s Ethereum compatibility layer. A security issue was discovered affecting parsing of the RPC result of the exit reason in case of EVM reversion. In release build, this would cause the exit reason being incorrectly parsed and returned by RPC. In debug build, this would cause an overflow panic. No action is needed unless you have a bridge node that needs to distinguish different reversion exit reasons and you used RPC for this. There are currently no known workarounds.\"}]}, \"problemtype\": {\"problemtype_data\": [{\"description\": [{\"lang\": \"eng\", \"value\": \"CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound\"}]}]}, \"data_version\": \"4.0\", \"CVE_data_meta\": {\"ID\": \"CVE-2022-36008\", \"STATE\": \"PUBLIC\", \"TITLE\": \"Message length overflow in frontier\", \"ASSIGNER\": \"security-advisories@github.com\"}}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2022-36008\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-04-23T17:48:19.789Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2022-07-15T00:00:00.000Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2022-08-19T20:25:10.000Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…