CVE-2020-1694 (GCVE-0-2020-1694)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2020-09-16 18:03
Modified
2024-08-04 06:46
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
Summary
A flaw was found in all versions of Keycloak before 10.0.0, where the NodeJS adapter did not support the verify-token-audience. This flaw results in some users having access to sensitive information outside of their permissions.
References
| ► | URL | Tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T06:46:29.917Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790759"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "keycloak",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "all versions before 10.0.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in all versions of Keycloak before 10.0.0, where the NodeJS adapter did not support the verify-token-audience. This flaw results in some users having access to sensitive information outside of their permissions."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-183",
"description": "CWE-183",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2020-09-16T18:03:14",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790759"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2020-1694",
"datePublished": "2020-09-16T18:03:14",
"dateReserved": "2019-11-27T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T06:46:29.917Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…