CVE-2020-10283 (GCVE-0-2020-10283)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2020-08-20 08:15
Modified
2024-09-16 17:08
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
Summary
The Micro Air Vehicle Link (MAVLink) protocol presents authentication mechanisms on its version 2.0 however according to its documentation, in order to maintain backwards compatibility, GCS and autopilot negotiate the version via the AUTOPILOT_VERSION message. Since this negotiation depends on the answer, an attacker may craft packages in a way that hints the autopilot to adopt version 1.0 of MAVLink for the communication. Given the lack of authentication capabilities in such version of MAVLink (refer to CVE-2020-10282), attackers may use this method to bypass authentication capabilities and interact with the autopilot directly.
References
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T10:58:40.387Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/aliasrobotics/RVD/issues/3316"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "MAVLink",
"vendor": "PX4",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Victor Mayoral Vilches (Alias Robotics)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2020-08-20T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Micro Air Vehicle Link (MAVLink) protocol presents authentication mechanisms on its version 2.0 however according to its documentation, in order to maintain backwards compatibility, GCS and autopilot negotiate the version via the AUTOPILOT_VERSION message. Since this negotiation depends on the answer, an attacker may craft packages in a way that hints the autopilot to adopt version 1.0 of MAVLink for the communication. Given the lack of authentication capabilities in such version of MAVLink (refer to CVE-2020-10282), attackers may use this method to bypass authentication capabilities and interact with the autopilot directly."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-288",
"description": "CWE-288",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2020-08-20T08:15:12.000Z",
"orgId": "dc524f69-879d-41dc-ab8f-724e78658a1a",
"shortName": "Alias"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/aliasrobotics/RVD/issues/3316"
}
],
"source": {
"defect": [
"RVD#3317"
],
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "RVD#3317: MAVLink version handshaking allows for an attacker to bypass authentication",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Robot Vulnerability Database (RVD)"
},
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@aliasrobotics.com",
"DATE_PUBLIC": "2020-08-20T08:07:15 +00:00",
"ID": "CVE-2020-10283",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "RVD#3317: MAVLink version handshaking allows for an attacker to bypass authentication"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "MAVLink",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "2.0"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "PX4"
}
]
}
},
"credit": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Victor Mayoral Vilches (Alias Robotics)"
}
],
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The Micro Air Vehicle Link (MAVLink) protocol presents authentication mechanisms on its version 2.0 however according to its documentation, in order to maintain backwards compatibility, GCS and autopilot negotiate the version via the AUTOPILOT_VERSION message. Since this negotiation depends on the answer, an attacker may craft packages in a way that hints the autopilot to adopt version 1.0 of MAVLink for the communication. Given the lack of authentication capabilities in such version of MAVLink (refer to CVE-2020-10282), attackers may use this method to bypass authentication capabilities and interact with the autopilot directly."
}
]
},
"generator": {
"engine": "Robot Vulnerability Database (RVD)"
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "high",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-288"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/aliasrobotics/RVD/issues/3316",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/aliasrobotics/RVD/issues/3316"
}
]
},
"source": {
"defect": [
"RVD#3317"
],
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "dc524f69-879d-41dc-ab8f-724e78658a1a",
"assignerShortName": "Alias",
"cveId": "CVE-2020-10283",
"datePublished": "2020-08-20T08:15:13.054Z",
"dateReserved": "2020-03-10T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T17:08:41.099Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…