CVE-2019-10201 (GCVE-0-2019-10201)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2019-08-14 16:09
Modified
2024-08-04 22:17
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
Summary
It was found that Keycloak's SAML broker, versions up to 6.0.1, did not verify missing message signatures. If an attacker modifies the SAML Response and removes the <Signature> sections, the message is still accepted, and the message can be modified. An attacker could use this flaw to impersonate other users and gain access to sensitive information.
References
| ► | URL | Tags | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T22:17:19.324Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10201"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "keycloak",
"vendor": "Red Hat ",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "up to keycloak 6.0.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "It was found that Keycloak\u0027s SAML broker, versions up to 6.0.1, did not verify missing message signatures. If an attacker modifies the SAML Response and removes the \u003cSignature\u003e sections, the message is still accepted, and the message can be modified. An attacker could use this flaw to impersonate other users and gain access to sensitive information."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-592",
"description": "CWE-592",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2019-08-14T16:09:38",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10201"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2019-10201",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "keycloak",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "up to keycloak 6.0.1"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Red Hat "
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "It was found that Keycloak\u0027s SAML broker, versions up to 6.0.1, did not verify missing message signatures. If an attacker modifies the SAML Response and removes the \u003cSignature\u003e sections, the message is still accepted, and the message can be modified. An attacker could use this flaw to impersonate other users and gain access to sensitive information."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": [
[
{
"vectorString": "8.1/CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
}
]
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-592"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10201",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10201"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2019-10201",
"datePublished": "2019-08-14T16:09:39",
"dateReserved": "2019-03-27T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T22:17:19.324Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…